1 / 3

On-Site Low Levels TPH Screening Device in Water and Soil

On-Site Low Levels TPH Screening Device in Water and Soil. Tsan -Liang Su, Ph. D. Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, New Jersey, USA Questor Research Proposal Presentations November 16, 2010. On-Site Low Levels TPH Screening Device in Water and Soil. CHALLENGE. APPROACH.

sasha
Download Presentation

On-Site Low Levels TPH Screening Device in Water and Soil

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. On-Site Low Levels TPH Screening Device in Water and Soil • Tsan-Liang Su, Ph. D. • Stevens Institute of Technology • Hoboken, New Jersey, USA • Questor Research Proposal Presentations • November 16, 2010

  2. On-Site Low Levels TPH Screening Device in Water and Soil CHALLENGE APPROACH Sensor Probe/ Device Development Raman Spectrometry probe associated with a potable Raman Spectrometer Data Analysis Model Development Analytical methods and procedures development TPH identification and concentration calibration in soil and water • Eliminated or reduced laboratory-based TPH analysis • Turn around time • Cost too high • Current technology • Field Analytical Methods (FAMs) • Ultraviolet fluorescence spectroscopy • Infrared analysis

  3. Business Benefits Costs Saving $2 per sample analysis vs. $30 per IR Analysis & $50 per GC Analysis On-site and Real-time Analysis Reusable sensor probes for integration with optical sensor network Better detection limit: 0.1 mg/L vs. 1 mg/L Multiple contaminated compounds identification capability

More Related