html5-img
1 / 54

Developing Fluency: Theory, Research and Practice

Developing Fluency: Theory, Research and Practice. Sharon Walpole University of Delaware. Anticipation Guide. Game Plan. What is fluency? Why is it important? How does it fit within models of reading and reading development? How can we measure it?

sasha
Download Presentation

Developing Fluency: Theory, Research and Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing Fluency: Theory, Research and Practice Sharon Walpole University of Delaware

  2. Anticipation Guide

  3. Game Plan • What is fluency? Why is it important? How does it fit within models of reading and reading development? • How can we measure it? • How can we address it during whole-class and needs-based instruction?

  4. Questions and Answers: Fluency • What is it? & Why is it important? Definitions, theoretical models and developmental models we have already explored and those described in recent fluency studies

  5. Fluency is “reading with expression.” Fluency is “making written language sound like oral language.” Fluency is evidence of comprehension? Fluency is a prerequisite to comprehension? What can you actually do with those ideas?

  6. Wolf and Katzir-Cohen’s Developmental Definition (p. 219) In its beginnings, reading fluency is the product of the initial development of accuracy and the subsequent development of automaticity in underlying sublexical processes, lexical processes, and their integration in single word reading and connected text.

  7. These include Perceptual [letter recognition?] Phonological [segmentation and blending?] Orthographic [graphemes and spelling patterns?] Morphological [grammatical morphemes? Prefixes and suffixes?] processes at the letter, letter-pattern, and word levels, as well as semantic and syntactic processes at the word level and connected-text level.

  8. After it is fully developed, reading fluency refers to a level of accuracy and rate where decoding is relatively effortless; where oral reading is smooth and accurate with correct prosody; and where attention can be allocated to comprehension. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-239.

  9. Fluency requires the child to use phonics and spelling knowledge automatically (DIBELS LNF, ISF, PSF, NWF)

  10. Fluency requires the child to automatically integrate phonics and spelling knowledge to recognize entire words (DIBELS ORF)

  11. Fluency requires the child to link recognized words into natural phrases, with appropriate enunciation and emphasis (DIBELS ORF)

  12. Fluency in Connected Text (textual) Fluency at the Word Level (lexical) Fluency within Words (sublexical)

  13. What are the implications of the developmental definition for curriculum and instruction?

  14. How is the developmental definition of fluency connected to theoretical models of skilled reading and of reading acquisition? Rayner, K., Foorman, B. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Pesetsky, D., Seidenberg, M.S., (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111%2F1529-1006.00004

  15. The short answer . . . all models of skilled reading AND stage models of reading acquisition either target or require fluency.

  16. Automaticity Theory • Two requirements of reading – automatic word recognition AND constructing meaning • The more energy spent with decoding, the less remaining for meaning construction Laberge & Samuels (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

  17. Stage 4 Highschool Stage 3 Grades 4 to 8 Stage 2 Grades 2 and 3 Stage 1 Grades 1 and 2 Stage 0 Birth to K Ages and Stages: Chall’s Model 4. Comprehension of multiple perspectives 3. Comprehension of a single perspective 2. Fluency 1. Phonological recoding 0. Alphabet knowledge . Chall, J.S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: MacGraw-Hill.

  18. Development of Automaticity in Word Recognition Does it happen at the level of the individual word? Does it happen at the level of the orthographic feature? Either way, it happens through repeated, successful exposures to words Share’s Self Teaching Hypothesis: Decoding Process Development of Orthographic Representation

  19. How well do the teachers, coaches, and administrators with whom you work understand fluency? Which concepts are new? What do you think we need to do to increase their understanding?

  20. How should we measure fluency? Fuchs, L. S. Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256. Good, R. H., Simmons, D.C. & Kame’enui, E.J. (2001). The importance of decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-239.

  21. Reading Rates (WPM) Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to increase reading ability (9th Ed.). New York: Longman.

  22. Fluency Norms: WCPM Rasinski, T. R. (2003). The fluent reader. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.

  23. NAEP Oral Reading Fluency Scale

  24. In GARF, how is fluency measured?

  25. How do teachers react to this notion of automaticity with basic processes and oral reading fluency taken as indicators of overall reading competence? Why don’t we just continually measure comprehension, since it is reading? Why don’t we measure silent reading rate? Why don’t we measure prosody?

  26. How might these automaticity and fluency assessments work together as a system for monitoring student achievement? Phonological Awareness Alphabetic Principle High Stakes Test Accuracy and Fluency

  27. One thing is certain . . . readers develop reading fluency through reading practice. Let’s try some.

  28. How can we support fluency development? Stahl, S. A. (2004). What do we know about fluency? Findings of the National Reading Panel. In P. McCardle & V. Chabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 187-211). Baltimore, MD: Brookes. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.

  29. Some Generalizations • ORF programs and strategies work within a specific developmental window – late first grade through early third grade • Increasing the volume of children’s reading is what all approaches have in common • Different forms of assistance and modeling may make more difficult (even grade-level) texts accessible • Fluency work develops fluency and comprehension, but not word recognition in isolation

  30. Guided Oral Reading But why can’t we just do what we’ve always done Round Robin Oral Reading Each child reads too little; Engagement is low Instructional time is wasted Teacher-provided feedback is of low quality

  31. Four Simple Alternatives

  32. What can teachers do with the whole class? • Distributed Practice • Fluency Development Lesson • Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) • Fluency-Oriented Reading Instruction (FORI) (For reviews of supplemental fluency curricula, consult http://fcrr.org and http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/SIprograms.php)

  33. Distributed Practice Children developing phonemic awareness and the alphabetic principle need short, frequent, targeted practice sessions. How can teachers facilitate this?

  34. Fluency Development Lesson 15 minutes 4xs per week • Teacher selects short text (100-200 words) and prepares two copies for each child • Teacher reads the text aloud several times • Class reads the text chorally several times with the teacher • Students work in pairs to reread the text 3 times each • Teacher sends text home for work with parents • Several pairs perform for the class Rasinski, Padak, Linek, & Sturtevant (1994). The effects of fluency development on urban second grade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158-164.

  35. PALS 3 xs 35 minutes each week, high-low pairs Text is appropriate for weaker reader 5 minutes: strong reader reads aloud 5 minutes: weaker reader rereads 2 minutes: weaker reader retells 5 minutes: strong reader reads paragraph by paragraph, stopping at each to tell the main idea 5 minutes: weak reader uses same summarization procedure 5 minutes: strong reader predicts content of next half page, reads it aloud, and revisits prediction 5 minutes: weak reader uses same summarization procedure This procedure has been used with students in grades 2-6 Fuchs, Fuchs, Mathes, & Simmons (1996). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: A manual. (Box 328 Peabody, Vanderbilt Univ. Nashville, TN 37203)

  36. FORI Redesigned whole-group basal lesson, grade 2 • Teacher reads story to children; they discuss • Echo and partner readings over the course of the week • Rereadings at home (15 minutes) • Free reading (SSR) 15-30 minutes This procedure has been effective for second graders especially for those who began second grade at least at the primer level. Stahl, S., Heubach, K., & Cramond, B. (1997). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Washington, DC: NRRC.

  37. What do these classroom programs have in common? There is some form of modeling and assistance, either by the teacher or a peer Repetition is planned and organized There are varied “performances” over time

  38. Current Practice Whole-class fluency work What are the strategies? Are they assisted or unassisted? How consistently are they used? What evidence do you have of their effectiveness? Where are teachers struggling?

  39. What about in needs-based groups? • Repeated Readings • Assisted Readings • Tutoring

  40. Repeated Readings • Teacher selects a passage that is challenging for the child. • The child reads it aloud while the teacher times and notes word recognition errors. • The teacher charts time and errors. • The teacher reviews the challenging words. • The child rereads (with continued charting) to a criterion of rate or repetition.

  41. 2:00 1:50 1:40 1:30 1:20 1:10 1:00 0:50 0:40 Reading Time in Minutes : Seconds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Times I Read the Same Passage

  42. 2:00 1:50 1:40 1:30 1:20 1:10 1:00 0:50 0:40 Week 1, Passage A Reading Time in Minutes : Seconds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Times I Read the Same Passage

  43. 2:00 1:50 1:40 1:30 1:20 1:10 1:00 0:50 0:40 Week 1, Passage A Week 2, Passage B Reading Time in Minutes : Seconds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Times I Read the Same Passage

  44. Assisted Reading

  45. Paired Reading with a Tutor • Child chooses a book • Child and tutor begin to read chorally • Child signals desire to read alone • Tutor provides words that child miscalls • Child and tutor reread sentence chorally • Child continues reading alone

  46. Current Practice Needs-Based Fluency Work What are the strategies? Are they assisted or unassisted? How consistently are they used? What evidence do you have of their effectiveness?

  47. What about fluency intervention? Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-239.

  48. Connectionist Models Reading Writing Speech Context Processor Meaning Processor Orthographic Processor Phonological Processor

More Related