1 / 10

Results Questionnaire 2

Results Questionnaire 2. Cordula Wagner, PhD Emmy Sluijs, PhD Mirjan Geurts, MSc Remco Coppen, MSc. Czech Republic - CZ Denmark - DK Finland - FIN Germany - D Hungary - HUN. Lithuania - LT Poland - PL Spain - E The Netherlands - NL United Kingdom - UK.

sarila
Download Presentation

Results Questionnaire 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Results Questionnaire 2 Cordula Wagner, PhD Emmy Sluijs, PhD Mirjan Geurts, MSc Remco Coppen, MSc

  2. Czech Republic - CZ Denmark - DK Finland - FIN Germany - D Hungary - HUN Lithuania - LT Poland - PL Spain - E The Netherlands - NL United Kingdom - UK Abbreviations of participating countries

  3. Explanations of terms Quality Management System (QM-system): a management system to direct, control and improve the quality of care. Quality Framework: the framework describes what to do (not how) and contains an interrelated set of rules and criteria required for implementing a QM-system. Response categories in the questionnaire: • Obliged by law, decree or contract: the obligation to apply QM-systems by third parties with controlling or sanctioning power (not voluntary). These obligations may be issued by law (legislation), by decrees (for example from inspectorates) or by contract with paying parties (insurers, funding). • Recommended by authoritative bodies: Recommendations may stem from national or regional authorities, professional bodies or umbrella organizations, consumer organizations or authoritative (national) institutes without controlling or sanctioning consequences (voluntary). • Private initiative: the application of QM-systems on own initiative or individual choice. There is no legislation and no recommendations by authoritative bodies.

  4. QM-systems in hospitals (a)

  5. QM-systems in hospitals (b)

  6. Degree of implementation of QM-systems in hospitalsAn indication of how many (minority / majority) hospitals have implemented QM-systems

  7. Addition to the Implementation Sheet

  8. Quality Frameworks in hospitals (1)

  9. Quality Frameworks in hospitals (2)

More Related