1 / 23

Silviculture in the Face of Global Change: Overview of UMN Silviculture Program

Silviculture in the Face of Global Change: Overview of UMN Silviculture Program. Tony D’Amato Dept. of Forest Resources University of Minnesota. Overview. Context for research Core focus of research program Silviculture in the face of uncertainty Summary. Current Context. Global change

saraho
Download Presentation

Silviculture in the Face of Global Change: Overview of UMN Silviculture Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Silviculture in the Face of Global Change: Overview of UMN Silviculture Program Tony D’Amato Dept. of Forest Resources University of Minnesota

  2. Overview • Context for research • Core focus of research program • Silviculture in the face of uncertainty • Summary

  3. Current Context • Global change • Increased climatic variation • Shifts in disturbance regimes • Invasive species • Increasing herbivore populations • Concerns over decreasing biodiversity

  4. Current Context • Changing ownership patterns • Implications to silvicultural practices • Changing land use and markets • Biofuels, carbon, etc.

  5. Main Focus Areas Main Focus Areas • Retrospective studies of forest stand dynamics using dendroecological approaches and long-term data collections from natural and managed stands, including long-term silvicultural experiments • Large-scale manipulative studies examining the response of forest systems to emerging issues including bioenergy production and invasive species

  6. Silviculture in uncertain times

  7. Carbon and climate change • View of forests and forest management within the context of global change largely focuses on two approaches: • Mitigation strategies: enhance forests ability to reduce human effects on climate by sequestering CO2 and reducing greenhouse gas emissions • Adaptation strategies:improve forest resilience/resistance to changes

  8. Age-class diversity Species/functional diversity Photo: J. Bradford, USGS

  9. Looking back to inform the future • Have different management regimes and stand types been more resilient to past climactic and biotic perturbations? • Experimental Forest Monitoring Project • Cooperators: J. Bradford, J. Brissette, S. Fraver, L. Kenefic, B. Palik (USFS) Examine inter-annual variability in growth across 5 long-term silviculture experiments

  10. Looking back to inform the future Trade-offs in achieving emerging objectives

  11. Looking back to inform the future

  12. Looking back to inform the future What factors have led to compositionally complex aspen systems in MN? • Aspen mixedwood productivity and dynamics Collaborators: M. Reinikainen (UMN), J. Almendinger (MN DNR), S. Fraver (USFS)

  13. Looking back to inform the future

  14. Looking back to inform the future FTC/SBW • Suggest opportunity for early stand entries to foster increases in compositional complexity • Later gap-phase dynamics suggest alternative to purely even-aged approaches FTC

  15. Looking back to inform the future Productivity implications

  16. Heading forward…..

  17. Black ash project • Anticipating and mitigating EAB impacts on lowland black ash systems in northern MN • How will loss of black ash affect vegetation communities and site hydrology? • Can we mitigate these impacts?

  18. Black ash project • Large-scale study on Chippewa NF • 4 treatments: • 1)EAB mortality (girdle ash), 2) Pre-emptive harvest (clearcutting), 3) Group selection, 4) Unharvested control • Each treatment is 4 acres and is replicated 4 times • Project team: B. Palik,G. Swanson, R. Venette (USFS); K. Brooks, A. Ek, C. Lenhart, P. Reich (UMN); R. Slesak, (MFRC)

  19. Black ash project • Evaluating strategies to mitigate impacts • Planting non-host species within each treatment: • 11 species, including northern white cedar, American elm, yellow birch, tamarack, Manchurian ash, and swamp white oak • Can sites remain in forested wetland condition following ash mortality?

  20. Biomass harvesting impacts • Assessing the environmental sustainability of biomass harvesting within the northern Lake States Project team: J. Bradford, S. Fraver, D. Linder, R. Kolka, M. Ostry, B. Palik (USFS); C.Blinn (UMN), R. Slesak (MFRC), J. Forrester and D. Mladenoff (UW), F. Aguilar (UMO)

  21. Biomass harvesting impacts • Examine impacts of varying levels of biomass removal on: • Biodiversity (vascular plants, wood-inhabiting fungi, amphibians) • Long-term productivity • Nutrient and carbon cycling, forest regeneration

  22. Summary • Goal is to develop applied solutions to emerging and core objectives related to forest management and conservation • Reliance on retrospective approaches provides long-term insight into questions that may not be answered with short-term studies • Use of large-scale experiments can address emerging issues within an operational context

  23. Thanks! Conclusions http://silviculture.forestry.umn.edu

More Related