E N D
1. SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross
2. PROBLEMS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM JUDICIAL SENTENCES LOSING MEANING
FELONS SERVING ONLY A FRACTION OF SENTENCE
4. PROBLEMS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM JUDICIAL SENTENCES LOSING MEANING
FELONS SERVING ONLY A FRACTION OF SENTENCE
MISDEMEANORS SPINNING THROUGH SYSTEM
PROBATION VIOLATIONS ESCALATING
OFFENDERS REFUSING ALTERNATIVES TO PRISON
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE ERODING
5. THE FIRST STEP CREATION OF SENTENCING COMMISSION
23 INITIAL MEMBERS
LEGISLATIVE DIRECTIVES
6. LEGISLATIVE DIRECTIVES CONSTRUCT CORRECTIONAL SIMULATION MODEL
CLASSIFY CRIMINAL OFFENSES
RECOMMEND STRUCTURE FOR SENTENCING
DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY CORRECTION STRATEGY
CONSIDER OTHER POLICY ISSUES
7. GOALS OF REFORM SET PRIORITIES FOR PRISON SPACE
RESTORE TRUTH IN SENTENCING
PROVIDE UNDERLYING RATIONALE FOR SENTENCING
ENHANCE CONSISTENCY IN SENTENCING
ENHANCE CERTAINTY IN SENTENCING
MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES
BALANCE SENTENCING POLICIES WITH RESOURCES
8. PROCESS FOLLOWED COMPONENTS OF SENTENCING DECISION
10. PROCESS FOLLOWED COMPONENTS OF SENTENCING DECISION
SUBCOMMITTEES DEVELOPED PROPOSALS
11. FELONY CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA*
12. FELONY CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA*
31. NC CRIME TRENDS INDEX CRIME RATES
32. NC CRIME TRENDSVIOLENT CRIME RATES
33. TRUTH IN SENTENCING RESTORED
ANNUAL PROJECTIONS TO HELP PLAN PRISON CAPACITY
NO PAROLE FOR OFFENDERS SENTENCED UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING
PRISON CAP REPEALED
VIOLENT OFFENDERS SERVING LONGER SENTENCES
TOUGHER COMMUNITY PUNISHMENTS
PUNISHMENT MORE CERTAIN AND CONSISTENT
SENTENCING POLICY FORMULATED IN CONSIDERATION OF CORRECTIONAL RESOURCES THE N.C. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TODAY
36. DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECTED PRISON POPULATION BY OFFENSE CLASSFELONIES ONLY
39. THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TOMORROW PRISONS WILL BECOME OVERCROWDED
LAWSUITS WILL RETURN
INCREASED RISKS TO CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
PROPOSALS FOR PAROLE WILL RETURN
TRUTH IN SENTENCING WILL BE COMPROMISED
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WILL BE SPENT ON PRISONS AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR OTHER NEEDS
40. ROLE OF THE SENTENCING COMMISSION MONITORING
IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS OF NEW LEGISLATION
RECOMMENDING MODIFICATIONS
41. ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURED SENTENCING PROMOTES TRUTH IN SENTENCING
SETS PRIORITIES
ALLOWS EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES
ENHANCES CONSISTENCY AND CERTAINTY IN SENTENCING
PROVIDES UNDERLYING RATIONALE FOR SENTENCING
BALANCES POLICY WITH RESOURCES
44. DISTRIBUTION OF FY 2007/08 CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCES WITHIN THE FELONY PUNISHMENT CHART (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS SLIDE)