1 / 29

SURFACE PROCESSING OF AN IRIDIUM ALLOY FOR CONTROL OF EMISSIVITY

SURFACE PROCESSING OF AN IRIDIUM ALLOY FOR CONTROL OF EMISSIVITY. E.K. Ohriner, W. Zhang, G.B. Ulrich, and R. G. Miller Materials Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory TMS Annual Meeting Refractory Metals 2011 San Diego, CA February 28, 2011. Outline.

samson
Download Presentation

SURFACE PROCESSING OF AN IRIDIUM ALLOY FOR CONTROL OF EMISSIVITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SURFACE PROCESSING OF AN IRIDIUM ALLOY FOR CONTROL OF EMISSIVITY E.K. Ohriner, W. Zhang, G.B. Ulrich, and R. G. Miller Materials Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory TMS Annual Meeting Refractory Metals 2011 San Diego, CA February 28, 2011

  2. Outline • Surface geometry effects on emissivity of iridium • Grit Blasting • process parameters • effects on surface geometry • Modeling of grit blast • surface geometry • plastic strain • Effect of grit blasting on grain growth during subsequent heating • Conclusions

  3. Elevated Temperature Total Hemispherical Emissivity of Iridium Clean iridium Oxidized in air 1 hr at 1363°C 4 hrs at 882°C 8 hrs at 882°C 34 hrs at 882°C From Report GESP-7071 (June 1971)

  4. Effect of Surface Preparation on Emissivity of Iridium Test temperature 423 K From Wladimir Sabuga and Reinhard Todtenhaupt, High Temperatures-High Pressures, Vol. 33, (2001) p. 265

  5. Emissivity of Pure Iridium Depends on Surface Slope Not Roughness Test temperature 423 K From W. Sabuga et al.

  6. Effect of Grit Blasting on Emissivity of Iridium DOP-26 Alloy (Ir-0.3%W-0.006% Th-0.005% Al)

  7. Effect of Surface Topography on Emissivity of Iridium

  8. Grit Blast of Iridium Alloy Stand Off Distance Grit Blast Cabinet

  9. Grit Blast of Iridium Alloy • Recrystallized at 1650 K • Grit blast with WC media • Mesh size 100 to 200 µm • 50 ± 5 psig air pressure • 425 grams average sprayed in 25 s • Spray area about 15 cm2 • 8-mm (5/16”) diameter nozzle • Nominal 10 cm (4”) standoff distance WC grit

  10. Schematic of Shotmeter for Measurement of Grit Velocity

  11. Effect of Air Pressure and Standoff Distance on Particle Velocity Minimum Measured Particle Velocity Maximum Measured Particle Velocity

  12. Simplified Finite Element Modeling of Grit Blasting of an Iridium Alloy • A single tungsten carbide (WC) particle impact on an iridium disc is simulated. • The WC particle is assumed to be rigid. • Impact velocities are 20, 30, 40 and 60 m/s. • The WC particle is approximated using three different geometries but with the same mass: • A sphere with a radius of 79.5 µm • A cone with a tip angle of 60 degree • A cone with a tip angle of 100 degree

  13. Axisymmetric Model And Mesh Spherical WC particle Iridium material

  14. Evolution Of Deformation During Impact

  15. Distribution Of Plastic Strain After A Single Impact on With Spherical Particle * Red color represents plastic strain more than 2.5% 50 µm 50 µm Impact velocity = 30 m/s Impact velocity = 20 m/s Impact velocity = 40 m/s Impact velocity = 60 m/s

  16. Distribution Of Plastic Strain After A Single Impact With Conical Particle Having 100° Tip Angle * Red color represents plastic strain more than 2.5% 50 µm 50 µm Impact velocity = 20 m/s Impact velocity = 30 m/s Impact velocity = 40 m/s Impact velocity = 60 m/s

  17. Distribution Of Plastic Strain After A Single Impact With Conical Particle Having 60° Tip Angle * Red color represents plastic strain more than 2.5% 50 µm 50 µm Impact velocity = 20 m/s Impact velocity = 30 m/s Impact velocity = 40 m/s Impact velocity = 60 m/s

  18. Model Results Show Increased Depth of Penetration with Angularity

  19. Model of Surface Using Square Array of Adjacent Impacts • Calculation of surface roughness arithmetic average (AA) and root mean square (RMS) slope or angle • Solid geometry formulas A Cross section – spherical indenter A A top view Cross section – conical indenter A

  20. Model Results and Measured Values for Roughness and Angle

  21. Surface Slope Depends on Grit Shape and Not Surface Roughness

  22. Comparison of Model and Experimental Results for Grit Blasting • Average roughness of grit blast surface is somewhat lower than model prediction • attributed to absence of overlapping impacts in the model • At equivalent particle velocity the measured average surface slope is midway between that predicted for spherical particle and oblique faceted particle (100° cone) • qualitatively consistent with the range of grit shapes, including large faceted particles, multiple small facets, and spherical • At equivalent surface roughness the measured average surface slope is midway between that predicted for spherical particle and oblique faceted particle (100° cone)

  23. Grit Blast Produces Region of Subsurface Plastic Strain • Observed by metallography to extend to about 20 µm • Can produce local recrystallization (1523 K/ 1hour)

  24. Subsurface Grain Growth With Limited Bulk Grain Growth at Higher Temperatures 1648 K for 1 hour 1773 K for 1 hour

  25. Effect of Grit Blasting on Grain Size in Subsurface Region Following 1 Hour Recrystallization

  26. No Abnormal Grain Growth in Region of Grit Blasted Surface for Exposure At Very High Temperature 2173 K for 1 minute 2173 K for 2 hours

  27. Conditions For Abnormal Grain Growth Not Produced By Grit Blasting • Large local strains at surface • Prior plastic strain in critical range 2% to 10% does not exist over large area as is the case for bending • Free surface limits grain enlargement 5% prior bend strain no prior strain 1550 K / 1 hr + 1225 K /1 month +1600 K / 3months + 1850 K /3 min (From McKamey et al. 2002)

  28. Conclusions • Simplified model results correlate with measured surface slope and roughness • Emissivity determined primarily by average slope of surface rather than average roughness • Surface roughness increases nearly linearly with grit velocity • Average surface slope varies little with grit velocity • Average surface slope is controlled primarily by particle shape • Strains from grit blasting can lead to localized recrystallization but do not cause abnormal grain growth

  29. Acknowledgments • Support of Office of Space and Defense Power Systems, U. S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC. • Larry Walker, Hu Longmire, Brian Walls of ORNL for microscopy and surface measurement. • Bill Barker of Progressive Technologies for particle velocity measurements

More Related