1 / 9

Bacterial Effects of Body Piercing

Bacterial Effects of Body Piercing. Robert S. Bruneel Undergraduate Student Department of Education Secondary Education Biology Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN 38501. Project Summary.

Download Presentation

Bacterial Effects of Body Piercing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bacterial Effects of Body Piercing Robert S. Bruneel Undergraduate Student Department of Education Secondary Education Biology Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN 38501

  2. Project Summary • PROBLEM/QUESTION-Are body piercings more prone to bacterial formation, depending on the place of the piercing? • OBJECTIVE- To prove that depending on the place of piercing, more bacteria formation is likely to occur around piercing site. • HYPOTHESIS- A person is more susceptible to bacteria formation around piercing site. • NULL HYPOTHESIS- A person is not more susceptible to bacteria formation around piercing site.

  3. Project Summary • GOAL: • To prove that people that have body piercings are more prone to bacterial growth around the pierce site than someone without the piercing at the same site. • HOW DO I ACCOMPLISH GOAL: • Data: Swabs of people with different piercings. • Treatments: • 1. People with no piercing. • 2. People that have an ear piercing. • 3. People with tongue piercing. • Control: People with no piercings. • Replicates: Two groups of people, both with ear piercings and two groups of people with tongue piercings and two groups of people with no piercings at all.

  4. Intoduction • PROBLEM = body piercing can cause serious bacterial infections. • HYPOTHESIS- A person is more susceptible to bacteria formation around piercing site. • NULL HYPOTHESIS- A person is not more susceptible to bacteria formation around piercing site.

  5. Articles Being Referenced • The risks of ear piercing in children • Schleroderma and body piercing • Monitoring and educational feedback to improve the compliance of tattooists and body piercers with infection control standards: A randomized controlled trial • Infection control practices among tattooists and body piercers in Sydney, Australia • Body piercing as a risk factor for viral hepatitis: An integrative research review • Antibiotic prophylaxis, body piercing and infective endocarditis • Body piercing: medical consequences and psychological motivations • Mastitis Due to Mycobacterium abscessus after Body Piercing

  6. Materials and Methods • Material/Supplies: • Swabs • Petri dishes • Incubator • People • Step-by-Step: • 1. Obtain people. • 2. Swab ear piercings. • 3. Swab tongue piercings. • 4. Swab similar area of people with no piercings. • 5. Streak Petri dishes and then incubate. • 6. Check for growth. • 7. Record data and analyze.

  7. Expected Results and Benefits • Data Summarization: Data will be summarized by a chart of data including colony counts. • Assumptions: The people that I do the experiment on will have good hygiene and no colds. • Expected Results: The people that I take swabs from will have more bacteria around pierce site, as others with no piercing will have less bacteria. • Advantages/Disadvantages = A lot of people have piercings, so it is easy to find subjects to experiment on, but not everyone has the same hygiene so the experiment has some error.

More Related