1 / 32

All - Cellulose Hierarchical Composites: Using Bacterial Cellulose To Modify Sisal Fibres

All - Cellulose Hierarchical Composites: Using Bacterial Cellulose To Modify Sisal Fibres. A. Abbott , J. Juntaro & A. Bismarck. Polymer & Composite Engineering (PaCE) Group Department of Chemical Engineering. Outline. Need for renewable materials Composite philosophy

sally
Download Presentation

All - Cellulose Hierarchical Composites: Using Bacterial Cellulose To Modify Sisal Fibres

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. All-Cellulose Hierarchical Composites: Using Bacterial Cellulose To Modify Sisal Fibres A. Abbott, J. Juntaro & A. Bismarck Polymer & Composite Engineering (PaCE) Group Department of Chemical Engineering

  2. Outline • Need for renewable materials • Composite philosophy • Innovative modification of natural fibres • Cellulose matrix processing • Route towards green composites • Truly green hierarchical composites • Possible applications

  3. Driving Forces To Green... • Growing environmental awareness • Stringent EOL legislation in the EU • Limitation of landfill capacity • Landfills count over 40% of plastic wastes • Endangering of wild life • Most plastics are not Biodegradable !

  4. Legislation & Materials • EU agreed on a sustainable politic • End-of-life Vehicle directive 2000/53/EC • Legislation to encourage re-use, recycling and other forms of recovery of ELVs • Landfill directive 1999/31/EC • Legislation to prevent or reduce negative effects on the environment from land filling of waste • WEEE directive 2002/96/EC • Legislation to tackle rapidly increasing waste stream of EEE by recycling of EEE and limitation of wastes.

  5. The Green Future • Strong need for new and reliable materials • Requirements: • Be recyclable, re-usable and biodegradable • Obtained from sustainable resources • Yield properties comparable to common plastics • Be produced at low cost • Be resistant to weathering A possible solution would be the use of cellulose based composite materials!

  6. Composite Architecture (1) • Composite have at least 2 constituents • Fillers • Different purposes: reinforcement, fire-retardant, colour, cost reduction, additives, etc... • Different sizes: from mesoscale to nanoscale • Polymer matrix • Aim: transfer load to fillers, hold and protect fillers • Type: thermosets, thermoplastics • Interface • Impact on composite properties

  7. Polymeric matrix Composite Architecture (2) Natural fibre Interface • Cross-section of randomly reinforced biodegradable composite

  8. Composite Philosophy

  9. Hierarchical Composites N-N Dimethylacetamide (DMAc), Lithium Chloride (LiCl), Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) Bacterial cellulose (BC)

  10. Green Fibre Modification (1) • Gluconobacter fermentation for 1 week • Strain BRP 2001(suitable for dynamic culture) • Modification during cellulose production Bioflow culture conditions: temp 37°C ; pH 5.5 ; agitation 700 rpm ; aeration 5 l/min ; carbon source fructose

  11. Green Fibre Modification (2)

  12. Green Fibre Modification (3) Fibre extraction from organic mass in 0.1 M NaOH 80°C 20 min

  13. Modification & Fibre Properties • No significant mechanical properties loss after grafting procedure Fibre conditioned @ 20°C and 50% RH; test performed @ 1mm/min, gauge length 20mm

  14. Modification & Fibre Crystallinity • Overall crystallinity increase after BC grafting • Surface fibre modified by green grafting process Crystallinity evaluated with Segal’s equation

  15. Cellulose Matrix Processing • Matrix system obtained from MCC • Properties tailoring f(processing time) • Brittle to ductile type behaviour • Short fibres incorporation after suitable dissolution time Dissolution mechanism presented by MacCormick (1979) N-N Dimethylacetamide (DMAc), Lithium Chloride (LiCl)

  16. Matrix Crystallinity vs. Processing

  17. Matrix Toughness vs. Processing

  18. All-Cellulose Composites Prop.(1) Testing Standards ISO 527-2 @ 1mm/min

  19. All-Cellulose Composites Prop.(2) Testing Standards ISO 527-2 @ 1mm/min

  20. All-Cellulose Composites Prop.(3) Test configuration: single cantilever beam Heating rate 5OC/min @ 1Hz in nitrogen atmosphere

  21. SEM All-Cellulose Composite SEM micrograph post cryo-fracture

  22. SEM Hierarchical Composite SEM micrograph post cryo-fracture

  23. SEM Hierarchical Composite SEM micrograph post cryo-fracture

  24. Conclusion • Effective fibre surface modification with BC • Grafted fibre bulk properties unchanged • Improved interfacial adhesion & stress transfer • 100% cellulose composite • Hierarchical composite structure • Principle transferable to other systems • Fibre functionalization by cellulose chemistry

  25. Potential Applications Adapted from book: Natural fibers, Biopolymer and Biocomposites; Mohanty (2006)

  26. Acknowledgements • Dr Sakis Mantalaris (Head of Biological Systems Engineering Laboratory)

  27. Thanks For Listening! Any Questions ?

  28. Matrix & Thermal Degradation Heating rate 5oC/min under nitrogen atmosphere

  29. Bacterial Synthesised Products(1) • Reinforcement: Bacterial Cellulose (BC) • Highly crystalline, pure cellulose compound • Tayloring BC properties during fermentation Czaja, et. al, Biomaterials 2006

  30. Bacterial Synthesised Products(2) • BC produced by Gluconobacter and others • Ribbon-shape fibrils 8-50 nm diameter • Chemically identical to plant cellulose Jonas & farah 1998

  31. BC Production (2) BC network & Bacteria Young’s modulus of single nanofibril: 78 GPa (similar to glass fibres) (Guhasos et al.,2005) 89% Crystallinity (Czaja et al.,2004)

More Related