Progress on the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Special Study: The Unique Role of a Surgeon Organization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Slide1 l.jpg
Download
1 / 34

Progress on the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Special Study: The Unique Role of a Surgeon Organization and Quality Surgical Solutions Hiram C. Polk, Jr. MD, FACS John N. Lewis, MD, MPH Jan P. Van Vlack, RN February 2005

Related searches for Progress on the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Special Study: The Unique Role of a Surgeon Organization

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Progress on the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Special Study: The Unique Role of a Surgeon Organization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Progress on the Surgical Care Improvement Project(SCIP) Special Study:The Unique Role of aSurgeon Organization

and

Quality Surgical Solutions

Hiram C. Polk, Jr. MD, FACS

John N. Lewis, MD, MPH

Jan P. Van Vlack, RN

February 2005


Scip special study from surgical infection prevention sip to scip l.jpg

SCIP Special Study…From Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) to SCIP

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) contract awarded to:

  • Kentucky Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO)

  • Ohio Medicare QIO


Scip special study continued l.jpg

SCIP Special Study continued

Subcontracts:

  • Kentucky Medicare QIO with Quality Surgical Solutions

  • Ohio Medicare QIO with Oklahoma Medicare QIO


Quality surgical solutions qss l.jpg

Quality Surgical Solutions (QSS)

A surgeon organization whose mission

is to improve quality and decrease costs of surgical care


Qss added value to scip l.jpg

QSS–Added Value to SCIP

  • Surgical quality expertise

  • Surgical research and practice expertise

  • Practiced, accomplished leadership

  • Surgeon network

  • Hospital recruitment and commitment

  • Access to surgeon data on hospital case abstracted data


Building physician consensus l.jpg

Building Physician Consensus

  • Growing awareness of quality movement

  • Quality is more than the avoidance of error

  • Surgeons curiously excluded and/or non-participants in much work to date


Scene setting l.jpg

Scene Setting

  • To Err is Human*and

    Crossing the Quality

    Chasm**

  • Fundamental conflict with

    extreme risks and/or anxiety about

    professional liability issues

  • Relative success with SIP

  • Promise of reassertion of physician

    leadership

* National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 2000 **National Academy Press , Washington D.C,.2001


Kentucky a favorable platform for special study l.jpg

Kentucky–A Favorable Platform for Special Study

  • University of Kentucky Medical Center (UKMC) alpha test site for National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP/VA)

  • Early quality initiatives at Norton Hospital

  • Quality Surgical Solutions

  • Health Care Excel of Kentucky


What is qss l.jpg

What is QSS?

  • 66 surgical specialists

  • 15 hospitals

  • 12 cities

  • 2 health plans

  • 43 protocols/current procedural technology (CPT) codes

  • BETTER PRACTICES


Specialties represented in qss l.jpg

Specialties Representedin QSS

  • General surgery to include trauma, digestive, vascular, colorectal, oncology, endoscopy

  • Orthopedic, otolaryngologic, urologic, gynecologic surgery


Fundamental hypotheses l.jpg

Fundamental Hypotheses

  • Better quality surgical care is associated

    with reduced direct and overall expenses

  • Physician–led initiatives work

  • Commitment to prove concepts and

    ethically reward its doctors

  • Only effective public role is that of patient advocate


Record of achievement locally l.jpg

Record ofAchievement Locally

  • Confidentiality of data

  • Prompt spread of agreed upon goals

  • Surgeons more prone to emulate other surgeons


Create an environment of transformational change l.jpg

Create an Environment of Transformational Change

  • Innovate, report, refine, publish

  • Quality Improvement Conference

  • Value of the “near miss” and the praise of heroes and heroines

  • Examine routine and/or outdated printed orders


Personal role generally helpful l.jpg

Personal Role–Generally Helpful

  • Accept secondary and tertiary referrals without pain

  • Longstanding commitment to surgical excellence

  • Trained (partly or fully) many of Kentucky’s surgical specialists

  • Halo effect of QSS and having discussed it with hundreds of surgeons and administrative leaders

  • Personalized letters seeking surgeon support for SCIP through their hospitals


Which six and why l.jpg

Which Six… and Why?

A Lap GBD CABG/valve

B HysterectomyE CR resections

C Major vascularF Total Knee/Hip

____________________________________

  • Not limited to Medicare beneficiaries

  • Primarily large volume hospitals

  • Significant complications and death


Recruitment for scip pilot l.jpg

Recruitment for SCIP Pilot

  • Group meetings for potential hospital participants and often their surgical specialists

  • Follow-up meetings, letters, and telephone calls

  • Recognition of the impact of current data submissions with invisible or meaningless feedback


Conference calls l.jpg

Conference Calls

  • Interest groups for each procedure

    • Lewis, Garrison, Polk, Van Vlack, and 2-5 specialists for the procedure

    • Prolonged sessions

    • Physicians very knowledgeable of current literature

    • Immediate agreement on process measures

      and feedback


Detailed development of qss involvement l.jpg

Detailed Developmentof QSS Involvement

  • Laborious development of doctor report forms

  • Alpha test of forms

  • Surgeon-leader reports

  • Begin to match hospital and surgeon reports

  • Broad-based education–laboratory for student success (LSS), grand rounds, collaboratives


An overview l.jpg

An Overview

  • Hospital contributions

    - Multiple procedures and surgeons

    • Honest sampling

    • Detailed, accurate abstraction

      - Tremendous enthusiasm

  • Surgeon contributions

    - Pre- and postop data

    • Detailed outcomes

    • Documentation of patient education


Unique opportunity to match hospital and physician reporting l.jpg

Unique Opportunity to Match Hospital and Physician Reporting

  • More complete outcomes

  • Validation of accuracy for both methods of reporting

  • Consolidate surgeon and hospital performance into homogenous profile of quality


Patient education l.jpg

Patient Education

  • Far better done in surgical specialists’ offices–how to document and promulgate

  • How can we quantitate and then assess quality?

  • Discussion


Atmosphere that promotes patient safety l.jpg

Atmosphere that Promotes Patient Safety

  • Near miss and specific praise for the hero or heroine

  • Value of the process that targets the very rare disaster

    • The analogy between a plane crash and a pulmonary embolus–prophylaxis of the latter carries both risks and costs


We have achieved our goals in reining in the professional liability dragon l.jpg

“We have achieved our goals in reining in the professional liability dragon.”

  • Physicians must now take the lead in identifying and solving problems of patient safety. We are now more protected than ever and can be the patient advocate we all want to be.

  • Allow doctors to clearly identify methods that provide improved quality.

    June, 2004 G.E. McGee, M.D., FACS


Peer reviewed publications l.jpg

Peer-Reviewed Publications

  • Allen JW, DeSimone KJ. Valid peer review for surgeons working in small hospitals. Am J Surg 2002;184:16-18.

  • Allen JW, Hahm TX, Polk HC Jr. Surgeon-led initiatives cut costs and enhance the quality of endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures. J Soc Laparosc Surg 2003;7:243-247.

  • Galandiuk S, Rao MK, Heine MJ, et al. Mutual reporting of process and outcomes enhances quality outcomes for colon and rectal surgery. Surgery 2004; 136:833-841. [Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, March 2004].

  • McCafferty MH, Polk HC Jr. Addition of “near-miss” cases enhances a quality improvement conference. Arch Surg 2004;139:216-217.

  • Shively EH, Heine MJ, Schell R, et al. Practicing surgeons lead in quality care, safety, and cost control. Ann Surg 2004;239:752-762 [Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Surgical Association, 2003].

  • Galandiuk S, Carter MB, Abby M, eds. When to Refer to a Surgeon. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing, 2001.


Slide25 l.jpg

A multifaceted endeavor with the ultimate goal of significantly improving surgical care in the United States through the prevention of complications associated with surgery


Slide26 l.jpg

With a goal to reduce surgical complications and mortality 25% by 2010, the following estimated complications could be prevented annually for Medicare beneficiaries.

13,000 perioperative deaths

271,000 surgical complications

Hunt and Bratzler


The elements of scip l.jpg

The Elements of SCIP

  • The Partnership

  • The Program

  • The Pilot


Slide28 l.jpg

The SCIP Partnership

A coalition of organizations interested in:

  • the improvement of surgical care through the reduction of post-operative complications

  • the development of performance measures and a data collection tool


Scip partners l.jpg

SCIP Partners

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

  • American College of Surgeons (ACS)

  • American Hospital Association (AHA)

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)

  • Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN)


Scip partners continued l.jpg

SCIP Partners continued

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

  • Department of Veteran Affairs (VA)

  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)

  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI)


Slide31 l.jpg

The SCIP Program

Technical elements, consisting of process measures (including specifications), outcome measures (including appropriate risk adjustment methods), and the “SPOT” database and electronic data collection tool


Slide32 l.jpg

The SCIP Pilot

A Medicare demonstration pilot designed to assess the feasibility of engaging private sector hospitals to reduce the incidence of post-operative morbidity and mortality


Where do we go from here l.jpg

Where Do We GoFrom Here?

Completion of pilot data collection

Final reports

Finalization of performance measures

for 8th SoW

National rollout


For more information l.jpg

For more information…

Visit the National SCIP Web site

http://www.medqic.org/scip

Contact the Kentucky Medicare QIO

kyscip@kyqio.sdps.org

(800) 300-8190

Contact Quality Surgical Solutions

http://www.qualitysurgical.com

(502) 583-7579

This material was prepared by Health Care Excel of Kentucky, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) of the Commonwealth, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a federal agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. Pub #HCEKI 01-2005


  • Login