1 / 30

AMELIORATION OF FEAR OF FALLING USING A GROUP APPROACH IN A GERIATRIC DAY HOSPITAL SETTING: EVALUATION AND IMPLICATIONS

AMELIORATION OF FEAR OF FALLING USING A GROUP APPROACH IN A GERIATRIC DAY HOSPITAL SETTING: EVALUATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BEST PRACTICE. Maureen Gorman , Ph.D. Dept of Psychology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII), Halifax, NS &

salena
Download Presentation

AMELIORATION OF FEAR OF FALLING USING A GROUP APPROACH IN A GERIATRIC DAY HOSPITAL SETTING: EVALUATION AND IMPLICATIONS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AMELIORATION OF FEAR OF FALLING USING A GROUP APPROACH IN A GERIATRIC DAY HOSPITAL SETTING: EVALUATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BEST PRACTICE Maureen Gorman, Ph.D. Dept of Psychology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII), Halifax, NS & Jaime Williams, M.A. Dept of Psychology, QEII, Halifax, NS; Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK

  2. disclosure declaration • There is no apparent conflict(s) of interest that may have a direct bearing on the subject matter of this presentation • We acknowledge Cathy Burton, M.A., in assisting to design and conduct the program.

  3. Fallsand Seniors Can result in • serious injury • 40% result in hip factures • death • 20% of seniors’ “injury-related deaths” traced to a fall • severe pain • developing fears about falling in the future (Cumming et al., 2000; Health Canada, 2005)

  4. Fears about falling in the future Associated with negative outcomes: (1) psychological difficulty • loss of independence • avoidance of activities > social isolation, poor self-rated health, and reduced quality of life (2) activity restriction > postural instability and physical deconditioning • Deconditioning > reductions in endurance, muscle strength, and coordination (3) a risk factor for future falls (e.g., Brummel-Smith, 1989; Delbaere et al., 2005; Franzoni et al., 1994; Howland et al., 1993; Maki et al., 1991; Murphy et al., 2002; Powell & Myers, 1995; Vellas et al., 1997; Zijlstra et al., 2007).

  5. Fear of Falling Group Proposal • To decrease older adults’ fear and anxiety related to falling • Secondarily to improve quality of life : • self-confidence in relation to daily activities, • self-efficacy related to managing conditions placing them at risk for falls, • physical activity, and social interaction. • based on previous work conducted in different contexts (i.e., Tennstedt et al., 1998; Zijlstra et al., 2005)

  6. Setting: A Multidisciplinary Geriatric Day Program Geriatric Day Hospital and Falls Clinic Centre for Health Care of the Elderly at the QEII Health Sciences Centre “Provides rehabilitative and other services to help the elderly reach a higher level of function or maintain their present level so they can stay in their home”

  7. Geriatric Day Hospital (GDH) • A comprehensive, interdisciplinary assessment and rehabilitative outpatient treatment program • For seniors who need at least two of the following services: geriatric medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy and social work. (Psychology, Seniors MH, etc: prn) • A Falls Clinic is a component of the GDH.

  8. Services Provided by the GDH • Medical assessment and care • Nursing care and supervisions • Diagnostic testing • Physiotherapy • Occupational therapy • Social work services • Medication monitoring and counselling • Psychological testing (NP), therapy and counselling • Diet therapy and counseling • Speech therapy • Family conferences/consultation • Home visits by various team members

  9. GDH Admission Criteria (Inclusion) Referred patients must • Be 65 years + (considers those 50-64 yrs) • Have multiple physical/psychosocial problems re: at least two GDH disciplines • Be willing to participate in the program • Have access to appropriate transportation to ensure consistent participation in their individualized program

  10. GDH Criteria (Exclusion) • Psychiatric illness as primary reason for referral • Acute illness requiring inpatient admission • Behaviors disruptive to a group setting • Requiring constant supervision

  11. GDH Attendance • Averages 2 days (am or pm) per wk for approximately 2 mos between Mon and Thurs. • Free service (travel subsidized prn)

  12. Referral • By any health professional • Family Physician must be aware of and in agreement with the referral

  13. Falls Clinic Referral • 65 years and over • require a team assessment • mobility, balance and/or falls is the main concern.

  14. Fear of Falling Group Focused on cognitive and behavioural strategies to address • beliefs about falling • anxiety reduction • perceived and actual loss of independence

  15. Participants: max 12; min 4 Inclusion Criteria: (meets criteria for GDH) plus: (1) Self-reported fear, concern, or worry about falling (2) Self-reported restriction or avoidanceof activity due to fear of falling: (3) Fluency in English or auditory comprehension of spoken English (1) & (2) assessed at pre-admission assessment, GDH staff ask “On a scale of 1 – 10 how worried or concerned are you about falling?” (1 = not concerned at all and 10 = worst fear you can imagine) “On a scale of 1 – 10 how restricted are your activities due to worries or concerns about falling?” (1 = not restricted at all and 10 = completely restricted)

  16. Exclusion Criteria • Permanent use of a wheelchair • Diagnosis of dementia but on a case-by-case basis, as deemed appropriate by GDH staff (i.e., if staff believe they may be able to benefit from the group).

  17. Checklist for Referral to Fear of Falling GroupPlease complete and fax to: (902) 473-4878 Patient Name: Date of Assessment: Unit Number: Referral Source: Is the Patient 65 years of age or older? YES NO Does the patient speak English fluently? YES NO Does the patient have an MMSE score 24 or higher? YES NO SCORE: ___________ If no, is referral still appropriate? Please comment on whether you believe the patient would be able to benefit from the group: ______________________________________________________________

  18. Checklist for Referral to Fear of Falling GroupCON’D Please ask:On a scale of 1 – 10 (with 1 being not concerned at all and 10 being worst fear you can imagine), how worried or concerned are you about falling? RATING: ___________ Please ask:On a scale of 1 – 10 (with 1 being not restricted at all in any of your activities and 10 being completely restricted in all of your activities), how restricted are your activities due to worries or concerns about falling?” RATING: ___________ Please indicate any additional concerns or conditions that may affect optimal participation in group: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Referral Source Date

  19. Group Format • COMPONENTS: Psychoeducational and Therapeutic • General information about fear of falling • Opportunity to share their own experiences and fears related to falls, to normalize their experiences and reactions. • Cognitive-behavioural framework to explore the impact of thoughts and beliefs on emotions such as fear, anxiety. • Information on general coping & feedback on assessed coping styles. • Adaptive coping strategies and anxiety management techniques. • Relapse-prevention. • Information and handouts; in particular, material from A Matter of Balance: Managing Concerns About Falls (Tennstedt et al., 1998) • TIME: One hour per week: Thursday, 12 am to 1 pm to maximize patient population from am & pm GDH programs; for 4 weeks

  20. Initial Psychology Pre-group Assessment • To determine appropriateness for group, • Obtain consent to participate in the group, program evaluation data collection, & a follow-up assessment to administer outcome measures (see below “Measures” section). • About 60 minutes in length, including administration of measures

  21. Group Outline • Pre-group individual assessment • Session 1 – General introduction to fear of falling • Session 2 – Thoughts & beliefs about falling and the impact on anxiety • Session 3 – Exploration of general coping styles • Session 4 – Anxiety management and coping skills • Post-group individual assessment

  22. ASSESSMENT: State Measure • State anxiety measured weekly, at the conclusion of each session – Time estimate is 5 minutes • State-Trait Anxiety Scale (Spielberger et al., 1970) – Time estimate is 15 minutes

  23. Outcome Measures Pre- and post-group assessment: fear of falling, anxiety, depression, coping, & life satisfaction • Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFFE; Lachman et al., 1998) – 15 minutes (Estimated) • Geriatric Depression Scale (Yesavage et al., 1982) • Pre-group scores obtained from initial GDH assessment • Coping with Health Injuries and Problems (CHIP; Endler & Parker, 2000) –15 minutes • Life Satisfaction Scale (Salamon & Conte, 1984) –15 minutes

  24. Program Evaluation Plan To evaluate the efficacy of the group: • The fear of falling group (Falls Group) compared to a wait-list control group (patients who also meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria & are interested in participating in the group). • Both groups pre-post the initial Falls Group • The wait-list control group also complete the measures following their Falls Group series.

  25. PLANNED Develop Project Proposal and present to GDH staff in May 2007 GDH staff identify potential group members and Psychology staff conduct pre-group interviews in June 2007 Begin first group in early July 2007 Begin second group, perhaps on a Wednesday, in late July 2007 Conduct post-group assessments in August 2007 Write up report for GDH staff Write up paper for presentation at CCSMH Sept. 24/07 ACTUAL Hard copy: May; Presentation: June 28 4 patients ID’d & interviewed, 2nd wk July 3rd wk July. N=2; 1 learned of vision problem; 1 time not convenient First Group: 3rd session 1 ½ hr; 4th session of first group not held- 1 group member had fall; have 2 referrals for Next Group n=1 Pilot Project Schedule

  26. N= 1 Pre-Post Male Age 78 Married Anxiety Problems Pre Post Change SAFFE: Activity Level 6/11 7/11 = Fear of Falling 7 2 + Activity Restriction 4 8 - Because other reasons 1 0 “Other” + fear of falling 2 1 +

  27. N= 1 Pre-Post, cont’d Pre%ile Post%ile Coping with Health Injuries & Problems (CHIP) Distraction coping 45 47 = Palliative coping 46 32 - Instrumental coping 55 48 - Emotional Preoccupation 67 51 *

  28. References • Brummel-Smith, K. (1989). Falls in the aged. Primary Care, 16, 377-393. • Cumming et al., 2000 • Delbaere, K., Willems, T. & Cambier, D. (2005). Devastating influence of fear of falling in the elderly. Gait & Posture, 21, Suppl 1, p. S114. • Endler, N.S., & Parker, J.D.A. (2000). Coping with Health, Injuries and Problems (CHIP): Manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems. • Franzoni et al. 1994 • Howland, J., Peterson, E.W., Levin, W.C., Fried, L., Pordon, D., & Bak, S. (1993). Fear of falling among the community-dwelling elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 5, 229-243. • Lachman, M.E., Howland, J., Tennstedt, S., Jette, A., Assmann, S., & Peterson, E.W. (1998). Fear of falling and activity restriction: The survey of activities and fear of falling in the elderly (SAFFE). The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53, P43-50. • Maki, B.E., Holliday, P.J., Topper, A.K. (1991). Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 46, M123-M131. • Murphy, S.L., Williams, C.S., & Gill, T.M. (2002). Characteristics associated with fear of falling and activity restriction in community-living older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 516-520. • Powell, L.E., & Myers, A.M. (1995). The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 50A, M28-M34.

  29. References Con’t • Salamon, M.J., & Conte, V.A. (1984).  Manual for the Salamon-Conte Life Satisfaction in the Elderly Scale (LSES).  Psychological Assessment Ressources, Inc. • Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for State–Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. • Tennestedt, S., Howland, J., Lachman, M., Peterson, E., Kasten, L., & Jette, A. (1998). A randomized, controlled trial of a group intervention to reduce fear of falling and associated activity restriction in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53, P384-P392. • Tombaugh, T.N., & McIntyre, N.J. (1992). The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 922-935. • Vellas et al., 1997 • Yesavage, J.A., Brink, T.L., Rose, T.L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V.O. (1982-1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37-49. • Zijlstra, G.A., van Haastregt, J.C., van Eijk, J.T., van Rossum, E., Stalenhoef, P.A., & Kempen, G.I. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of fear of falling, and associated avoidance of activity in the general population of community-living older people. Age & Aging, 36, 304-309

More Related