html5-img
1 / 33

MH-10: Attempt to End Stalemate-1914-1916

MH-10: Attempt to End Stalemate-1914-1916. But No Man's Land is a goblin sight When patrols crawl over at dead o' night; Boche or British, Belgian or French, You dice with death when you cross the trench James H. Knight-Adkin - No Man's Land. Stalemate & Attempts to End It The Western Front.

said
Download Presentation

MH-10: Attempt to End Stalemate-1914-1916

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MH-10: Attempt to End Stalemate-1914-1916 But No Man's Land is a goblin sightWhen patrols crawl over at dead o' night;Boche or British, Belgian or French,You dice with death when you cross the trenchJames H. Knight-Adkin - No Man's Land

  2. Stalemate & Attempts to End ItThe Western Front • A final major attempt was made by both sides to encircle the others Northern flank in Flanders • This too would end in horrendous casualties with little else to show for it • Except for a long defensive line, fortified by trench & barb wire • Gradual realization emerged that WWI would not be short • No short decisive battles likely

  3. Stalemate & Deadlock • Stalemate & deadlock obvious to all levels: • Both at the Operationalandtactical levels • This fact did not stop the participants from trying to break through each other’s defensive lines however • War also spread throughout Europe => then World • From an isolated terrorist’s act to a World War: • Conducted globally on land, sea, & even in the air • Armies consumed ever greater $$$ resources • Governments mobilized entire populations

  4. Reassessing Strategies • Key participants forced to reassess their strategies • Key Question: What strategy most likely to win war? • Central Powers: where to focus its forces best? • East or West? • Defense or offense? • Which theater to concentrate on first? • Allies: similar questions: • Concentrate allied armies on Western Front? • Continue to try for breakthrough? • Seek alternative front – perhaps strategic flank?

  5. Elusive & Costly Strategy • Debate raged on which allied strategy should be pursued: • But all agreed to block enemy’s access to materials: • Who takes the lead to block Germany’s materials? • ?_________ ___________ • Which strategy did allies decide to pursue in 1915? • ?___________________ • How well was this strategy executed & what resulted? • Cost ?__________& success ?__________ • Search for a successful breakthrough continues

  6. Mobility in the West • What do allied leaders conclude about mobility in West? • ?__________ & a ?__________ ________war likely • What do Central Powers conclude at this point in war about the two fronts & which front appears better to operate in? • ?___________ line in Westcould be held for time being; • Eastern Front offered more potential for mobility & success- why? ?_________________

  7. Home front – adjustments required: • Mobilization & organizing $$$ resources require sacrifice of each side’s population: • Higher taxes, shortages & substitutions, rationing • Role of Sea Power? • Would play a major ?_____________ role • Protect & deny transit of raw materials needed for war • Which side in best position to accomplish above? • German response to deal with attendant shortfalls: • Price controls, rationing, innovation, invention, erstatz • “War bread,” cellulose, et cetera

  8. Search for Tactical & Strategic Alternatives • Following “Race to Sea” – • Both sides attempt to attain what? • Breakthrough into enemy’s rear • Key Op & tactical objectives: • End the stalemate in West: • Achieve breakthroughto open field in enemy’s rear • Fight and win adecisive battle • Both sides worked hard to achieve this key objective: • Initiated several more operational offensives&tactical assaults: • Ypres, Champagne, St. Mihiel • Results? (Ypres typical example)

  9. First Battle of Ypres- The Plan • The battle started as an unexpected meeting engagement (then a series) • The BEF had just redeployed from the Marne area north to Flanders (closer to their LOC) • Falkenhayn had just reinforced his northern RF for an offensive • Operational & Tactical Objectives: • BEF intended to destroy 4th Army remnants near Ghent • Germans wanted to flank the Allies and take the Channel ports at Calais & Dunkirk • They would begin in earnest with an attack on 31 Oct through Ypres

  10. First Battle of Ypres- Execution: 31 Oct 1914“The Massacre of the Innocents” • OOB: • BEF had 7 Infantry & 3 Calvary Divisions for total of 100K well trained combat veterans (all excellent marksmen) • Germans had 4th& 6th Armies reinforced with an Army TG for total of 150K • Mostly untrained green recruits • 31 Oct: Germans launch 2 pronged attack at Messines Ridge &Gheluvelt • Capture both but unable to exploit • Cost: II Bavarian Corps=> “Kindermort” • (Nothing between the Germans & Ypres) • Heroic charges by remnants of London Scottish & 2nd Worcesters restore line at great costs (321 of 750 and 192 of 461)

  11. First Battle of Ypres- Results • After numerous attacks & counter-attacks • No permanent breakthrough achieved • But 58K Brits & even more attacking Germans lay dead or wounded • And the surrounding landscaped lay barren & destroyed

  12. Steep Learning Curve of War • Learning curve for military commanders extremely high: • Tactics only gradually adjusted to new realities faced: • Example: How to deal with entrenchedmachine guns & artillery • “The machine gun is a much overrated weapon” (Haig -1915) • Tacticalchanges were finally made: • Pre-assault artillery bombardment expanded • Improved coordination between arty & infantry • Supporting arms incorporated, to include chorine & tear gas • Smoke adapted to hide tactical intent & panic enemy • Assault tactics also modified: • Massive artillery preparation & effect made on both sides • Less time needed to re-enforce defense than re-enforce assaulters • Example: Tactical defense in-depth(German defense belts) • Overall impact toward realizing allied objective? • ?______________ ____________________

  13. Trench Warfare • Evolution: 2-3 lines to extensive belted systems • Day to day existence in the trenches: • Waiting to be ordered to go “Over the top” to “no man’s land” • Assaulting entrenched Machine Guns, arty, barb wire • Constant threat: attack, overrun, arty barrages, disease, maiming & death

  14. Peripheral Operational Strategy • Various attempts made to find new fronts • Strategic Aim: • Breakthrough & end stalemate: • Attempts included British & French attack on German colonies • Located throughout Africa & Pacific • When Ottoman Empire allied with Germany: • New opportunity opened to hit strategic flank of Central Powers • Started debate of pros & cons of a peripheral strategy: • Two opposing positions: • Westerners: Concentrate all on Western Front: • (? Who specifically advocated:______________________) • Easterners: Indirect approach – Middle East & SE Europe • (? Who specifically advocated:______________________)

  15. Gallipoli Campaign (Feb 1915 – Jan 1916): • Strategic Objective: • Seize Dardanelles & expand sea borne communication w/Russia • Sever LOC between Germany & Turkey

  16. Royal Navy Takes First Shot • 1st Stage of Campaign: British Navy force straits: • Navy show only – Kirchner insists army not available • Churchilltakes on project as his own & forces it over Navy HQ objections • Navy’s tactical & operational objectives: • Clear mines in strait & force narrows to east • Seize Gallipoli Peninsula & Constantinople

  17. Royal Navy- Execution • Royal Navy’s Execution: • 19 & 25 Feb 1915: first & 2nd attempts made by combined Br & Fr Fleet(BBs, BCR, pre-DN, CR, DDs, SS, Trawlers + Seaplane CV) • Naval bombardment ineffective and causes loss of strategic (& operational) surprise • 18 Mar:Navy attempts to force narrows (X 1600 m & heavily mined) • Turk mines & mobile shore batteries ensure heavy British Navy losses that include several capital ships & minesweepers • Navy forced to withdraw to await Army & reinforcements to land & silence Turk guns • A month would pass before their arrival • Delay enables Turks to reinforce & prepare entrenched batteries

  18. Army Takes Over • Ian Hamilton appointed to lead force • Delay at the top & scramble at last minute below to come up with plans & logistics • Divided command & misunderstood objectives reign • Von Sanders & 84K Turks use British delay to great effect: • Place troops in central position for rapid reaction to landing & await invasion • Brits put together a straightforward plan for opposed amphibious assault: • Army’s initial tactical objectives: • Helles & Anzac Cove beachheads

  19. Army’s Execution: 25 April • Army assault commences: • FR, Br, & ANZAC hit assigned landing sites at Helles & Anzac Cove • Heroic efforts try to beat stiff resistance - taken at great costs (6 Victoria Crosses) • 28 April/May/June: Britsattempts 3 separate assaults on Krithia (all fail) • 6 Aug: 125K reinforcements deployed to land at Sulva Bay (with diversions to south) • All assaults repulsed at high casualties • Evacuate forces 10-20 Dec & 9 Jan 1916 • Many British Army & Navy C2 errors • Who’s in charge? • Result: Missed opportunities & failure at very high cost • Brits: 205K; Fr: 47K out of 480K Allies • Turks: 250K

  20. Battles of Attrition - 1916 • Distinct lack of formal tactical coordination evident among allies: • Informal Brit & Frenchoperationalcoordination only • British focus in Flanders on Northern coast near North Sea • British Navy operations only real allied success • With exception of German SS ops, Brits were able to bottle up German Surface Fleet following the sea Battle of Jutland

  21. Central Power Operations in East • Central Powers enjoyed greater success in East: • Operations in Poland & Galacia • Gorlice-Tarnow Breakthrough: • Forced Russian withdrawal to East • Still, British Navy blockade having serious effect on Germany’s economy • Falkenhayn decides he must now focus on Western Front • What does he decide to attack & why?

  22. Battle of Verdun (Feb-Aug 1916) • Falkenhayn’sObjective: “Bleed the allies white…”– • Battle of Attrition strategy: • Troops’ view: Sausage grinder vs. the furnace • French do fight for Verdun & barely hold on • Seek help from Allies & develop flexible defense (Petain) • Results: high causalities for little to no gain (Map) • Over 300,000 lost byboth sides

  23. Battle of the Somme (24June – mid Nov 1916) • Sir Douglas Haig’s Grand illusion & the limits of arty bombardment • Ambitious tactical objectives with diluted fire preparation • Objectives: High ground between Bapaume & Peronne • Offensive moved up to take pressure off French at Verdun (Operational) • Result: disaster – 30,000 Brits killed/wounded in 1st hour • High casualties for very little gain => miscalculation=> huge waste of troops • 57.4K by days end & both sides exhausted by end of Battle

  24. Eastern Theater- 1916 • Meanwhile the Russians are gearing up to help out their allies to the West • Tsar makes critical personnel change affecting South Western Front • Russians then commence planning for a major offensive- • Name of this Offensive?* • ?________ ____________

  25. Brusilov Offensive • Russia’s Strategic Objective: • Relieve pressure on western front • Timed & coordinated with British offensive in the Somme (relieve French at Verdun) • Cmdr SW Front replaced by General Brusilov • Good move by Tsar- why? • Brusilovmakes several immediate tactical improvements: • Adapts tacticalLessons Learned • Coordinates arty support with infantry assaults • Meticulous planning completed for ops

  26. Brusilov Offensive- Execution • Brusilov conducts full day of arty prep: • June 4: offensive begins along 175 mile front • Four field armies successfully attack along entire front • Capture 140K Austrians, 216 guns, 645 MGs • July 2: Northern Front Cmdr finally begins his advance => with very little gain • (His advance was suppose to be the main one) • Brusilov continued his own advance: • Germans & Austrians rush in reinforcements: • Effect: slows Russian advance • Still Brusilov’s forces advance 50 Miles (Map) • Captured 390K POWs by late July • And took much pressure off French at Verdun

  27. Brusilov Offensive- Key Points • BrusilovOffensive had major impact on Verdun- how & why? • Hampered Germans in their prosecution of ?__________ Offensive because more troops were needed in the East to stop the Russian advance • Also effected Austria’s offense in Italy • Forced redeployment of troops to East • Russian “victory” at very high cost • Strategic impact? • Sowed the seeds of future ?_______ ________ during 1917

  28. Tactical & Technical Advances:Tactics & Weapons • Tactics: • Coordinated arty prep for infantry assaults becomes norm • French adapt flexible defense • (forged at Verdun) • Germans invent elastic defense (Dec 1916): • Spread out front, yield ground & then counterattack; • Small units given local C2 with emphasis on unit level initiative: target objective=> enemy arty • Advances in Weapons Technology: • Gas, trench mortar, flamethrower • Bangalore Torpedo, light Machine Gun

  29. Tactical & Technical Advances: Airplane • Employment: Recon primarily (Battle of Marne) • Aerial photo of Western front • Problem with using airplane during early stages of war? • (?__________ – neither efficient or rapid) • Refinements offered greater potential for future employment: • Air to air combat • Close air support • Strategic bombing • Naval aviation (CVs of WWII) • Photos: Fokker Tri-planes & British Bi-wing fighters

  30. Tactical & Technical Advances: Tanks • French & British developed first armored vehicle: • Both recognized potential application to overcoming defense of the trenches • Brits employed first during Somme (with little success) • Frenchin 1917 offensive • First effective use of Tank: • Tactical assault on Cambrai– Nov 1917 • Photos: British assault on Hindenburg Line& German Tank-Infantry training

  31. Assessment (1914-1916) • Offensives of 1914-16 cost many lives for little gain: • Great $$$ resources also expended to end war • New tactics & technologies employed to little effect; • All aimed at breakthrough to end stalemate; • New weapons & Tactics: • Aircraft, tank, gas, & assortment of infantry weapons • Tactics - continued to be developed & refined: • Elastic defense • Coordinated assaults • Creeping barrage

  32. Assessment- Major Adjustments • Both sides forced to make operational adjustments: • After numerous breakthrough attempts by both sides fail • Alternatives to Trench Warfare in West urgently sought: • Peripheral strategies: Allies @ Gallipoli & GW in Middle East • Alternate concentration of fronts (Germans) • (Western front => Eastern front => Back to West again) • Variation of more of the same? • Strategy of attrition (Falkenhayn at Verdun) • By late 1916- high cost & casualties take toll on both sides: • Still all sides determined to stick it out no matter what - why? • Too much ?_______ & ?_____________ already invested • Upper class sons ?_________ - including those of Generals • No one willing to admit this loss was for “nothing”

  33. Eastern Theater • Meanwhile the Russians are gearing up to help out their allies in the West • Tsar makes critical personnel change affecting South Western Front • Russians then commence planning for a major offensive- • Name of this Offensive? • ?__________________

More Related