slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Transatlantic Conference Brussels, November 12, 2013 “Time to Rethink our Policy on Drugs -

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 35

Transatlantic Conference Brussels, November 12, 2013 “Time to Rethink our Policy on Drugs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 214 Views
  • Uploaded on

Transatlantic Conference Brussels, November 12, 2013 “Time to Rethink our Policy on Drugs - Experiences from Europe and the Americas” Pave l Bem, MD. National Drug Commission, Czech Republic Global Commission on Drug Policy. „ Opportunities and risks stay so close together…“.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Transatlantic Conference Brussels, November 12, 2013 “Time to Rethink our Policy on Drugs -' - sagira


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Transatlantic Conference

Brussels, November 12, 2013

“Time to Rethink our Policy on Drugs -

Experiences from Europe and the Americas”

Pavel Bem, MD.

National Drug Commission, Czech Republic

Global Commission on Drug Policy

slide2

„Opportunities and risks

stay so close together…“

50 years of world s experience of combating illicit drugs
50 Years of World’s Experience of Combating Illicit Drugs
  • International cooperation in supply reduction
  • Crop eradication
  • Policies based on balanced approach between repression and prevention
  • Role of primary prevention/health education
  • Treatment and rehabilitation
  • Focus at urban policies
negative results supply reduction failed
Negative Results:Supply reduction failed
  • Supply of illicit opioids has increased 400% in last 30 years
  • 75% decrease of heroin black market price
  • 900% increase in heroin purity
  • US budget increase in war on drugs: 600%

(United Nations Office on Drug and Crime, 2010)

No effect on supply reduction side

negative results balanced drug policies failed
Negative Results:”Balanced” drug policies failed
  • Drug policy “driven” HIV epidemics, mortality
  • Policy “driven” HCV epidemics, morbidity
  • Missing balance in total expenditures: “supply vs. demand”

80% vs. 20%

  • Failure in assessment of evidence based approach

20% vs. 80%

  • Failure of national as well as supranational organizations in effective response

Unintended negative consequences

mustang ghar ghiling gompa 9 1 0 th cent
Mustang: Ghar, Ghiling Gompa, 9-10th cent.

“Unintended negative consequences”:

Overall cost is to high…

slide8

BUT…

We act only on the “surface” of the problem…

positive results demand and harm reduction works
Positive Results:Demand and harm reduction works
  • Reducing HIV prevalence among PDU’s
  • Reducing HCV prevalence among PDU’s
  • Reducing hidden population of PDU’s
  • Reducing mortality among PDU’s
  • Reducing morbidity among PDU’s
  • Reducing not only public health risks, but overall social and economic costs
slide10
The need for paradigm change
  • Acceptance of failures
  • Understanding of best practices
  • The role of supranational authorities:

Active leadership

(Latin America + Europe…)

l

slide11
The need for paradigm change
  • Prague: case study
  • Czech experience
  • Global Commission on Drug Policy
slide12
Prague Drug Policy Design
  • Pragmatic approach
  • Realistic attitude
  • Data based design
  • Balanced policy and measurable outcomes
slide13
Prague Drug Policy Design
  • Balance between public health and safety
  • Economy driven drug policy
  • Evidence based interventions
  • Police does it’s job on drug supply side
  • Demand and harm reduction services
  • Measurable outcomes (HIV, HCV, morbidity)
slide14
Prague Drug Policy Design
  • Availability of needles and syringes
  • Availability of services + outreach
  • Methadone + Buprenorphine + …
  • Non-punitive legal framework (possession is not legal offence)
slide18
Where are the benefits?
  • Low proportion of hidden population (< 30%)
  • Low mortality rate
  • Low prevalence of HIV among PDU’s-IVDU
  • Manageable morbidity rates
  • Manageable dynamics
  • Reduced public health risks
  • Acceptable economic and social costs

14

slide20

We behave in simplistic way with no respect to human diversity and human rights (Papua, 2003)

slide21
New Penal Code: 1998

Penalizing possession

Czech Republic case study

pad impact analysis project of the new drug legislation
PAD: Impact Analysis Project of the New Drug Legislation

Complex Cost and Benefit Analysis

(5 major studies and 20 sub studies):

1. Secondary analysis of school surveys

2. Prevalence study of problem drug use in the CR

3. Economic and social cost of illegal drug use in the CR

4. Qualitative study among illicit drug users

5. Cost and benefit analysis of the implementation of

penalization of possession of illicit drugs for

personal use

research methodology
Research Methodology
  • Combination of quantitative and qualitative methods
  • Measuring the direct as well as indirect costs
  • Interdisciplinary research team
  • Supervised by Florida State University, School of Criminal Justice
  • Granted by the National Drug Commission
main hypothesis
Main Hypothesis
  • 1. Availability of Illicit Drugs Will Decrease
  • 2. Use of Illicit Drugs Will Decrease
  • 3. Incidence of Illicit Drug Use Will Decrease
  • 4. Negative Health Indicators Will Not

Increase

  • 5. Social Costs Related to Drug Abuse Will

Not Increase After Introduction of a

Penalty of Possession for Personal Use

results
Results
  • All hypothesis were rejected in 3 years study
  • No positive impact of the criminalization law at all

Lead to Decriminalization Act 2008

  • Evidence based additional costs for public budgets
slide27

RecommendationsPrague Declaration, 20091.No size fits all2.Realism is the key3.Human rights apply to ill people in particular4.Public health and public safety concerns must not be seen as contradictory5.Evidence based decision only6.Evaluation and monitoring7.Constant and improving mutual information flow

slide28
Drug Policies at Crossroad

Conclusions:

1. War on drugs has failed:Need for “rebalancing action” in drug policies design

slide29
Drug Policies at Crossroad

Conclusions:

2. Need for wider implementation of cost effective public health measures:Harm reduction services especially at areas of high risk

slide30
Drug Policies at Crossroad

Conclusions:

3. Decriminalization of drug possession and drug consumption worldwide

slide31
Drug Policies at Crossroad

Conclusions:

4. Reallocation of drug budget priorities

slide33
The need for paradigm change
  • Growing awareness internationally

(Global Commission on Drug Policy: former presidents, prime ministers, UN officials, intellectuals…)

  • Vienna high level meeting: CND 2014

(EU Action Plan on Drugs 2013-2016, action #5]

  • UNGASS 2016
slide34

“Wishful thinking” is still prevailing among many politicians, decision makers as well as media

slide35
www.globalcommissionondrugs.orgwww.vlada.czwww.cadap.eu www.praguedeclaration.comkThank you for your attention
ad