do credit rating agencies add value evidence from the sovereign rating business
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Do Credit Rating Agencies Add Value? Evidence from the sovereign rating business

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 32

Do Credit Rating Agencies Add Value? Evidence from the sovereign rating business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 135 Views
  • Uploaded on

Do Credit Rating Agencies Add Value? Evidence from the sovereign rating business. Eduardo Cavallo, IADB Andrew Powell, IADB Roberto Rigobon, MIT. Motivation. Do credit agencies add informational value to an already well functioning financial market?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Do Credit Rating Agencies Add Value? Evidence from the sovereign rating business' - saburo


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
do credit rating agencies add value evidence from the sovereign rating business

Do Credit Rating Agencies Add Value? Evidence from the sovereign rating business

Eduardo Cavallo, IADB

Andrew Powell, IADB

Roberto Rigobon, MIT

motivation
Motivation
  • Do credit agencies add informational value to an already well functioning financial market?
    • Rating changes are usually anticipated. Hence, they should have been incorporated in interest rates and other financial variables.
    • In sovereign debt, does the rating adds information beyond the information already in the interest rate?
  • Very difficult to disentangle informational content of credit ratings
what do we do
What do we do?
  • Evaluate informational content using methodology robust to several misspecification errors
  • Evaluate impact of rating changes on stock markets, future spreads, and exchange rates – after controlling for current interest rates and VIX
what we find
What we find?
  • Ratings provide information in additional to interest rates
  • Rating upgrades
    • Reduce future interest rate spreads
    • Increase stock markets
    • Appreciate exchange rates
  • Results are quite robustness
agenda
Agenda
  • Methodology
  • Data
  • Results
  • Conclusions
methodology
Methodology
  • Technically we are askingif the interest rate is a sufficient statistic for the credit rating.
  • We have to allow for misspecification.
  • To test this hypothesis we assume that there is an underlying fundamental for the economy, and interest rates and credit ratings are imperfect measures of it.
  • We evaluate the “sufficient statistic” property of the interest rate trying to explain other financial variables
    • Future spread
    • Stock market
    • Exchange rate
methodology1
Methodology

X(t)

I(t)

methodology2
Methodology

X(t)

R(t)

methodology3
Methodology

X(t)

I(t)

R(t)

methodology4
Methodology

S(t)

X(t)

I(t)

R(t)

methodology5
Methodology
  • Idea
    • If the true model isthen we can estimateby OLS or using ratings as IV.
  • Test
    • Under the null hypothesis the OLS estimate and the IV estimate are identical.
    • Under the alternative hypothesis, the OLS and IV are different. The OLS is biased because of EIV, but IV is consistent.
methodology6
Methodology
  • After we have found that the rating has informational content, we run a horse race between interest rates and ratings.
    • We estimate in a window surrounding credit rating changes. (+/- 10 days)
    • Fixed effect per event
    • Cumulative returns – to deal with endogeneity and anticipation.
methodology7
Methodology
  • Typical event
agenda1
Agenda
  • Methodology
  • Data
  • Results
  • Conclusions
slide15
Data
  • Source: Bloomberg
  • Daily information
  • 32 emerging market economies
  • January 1st 1998 and April 25th 2007
  • Macro variables: stock market, interest rate spread, dollar exchange rate, VIX
  • Ratings: Moody, S&P, Fitch – transformed to a numerical scale.
  • Unbalanced panel with ~80k observations
slide17
Data
  • Concurrence of credit rating changes (21 days)

21

12

15

5

agenda2
Agenda
  • Methodology
  • Data
  • Results
  • Conclusions
results
Results
  • Pooled all credit rating events.
  • Fixed effects for each event.
  • Analyze window of 21 days surrounding credit rating change.
  • Use cumulative returns.
  • We are not concerned with interpretation of coefficient. No attempt to disentangle channel of propagation.
results1
Results
  • Table 4: OLS versus IV
results2
Results
  • Table 5: summary
lessons
Lessons
  • Informational content
    • Around credit rating changes, ratings provide information beyond interest rates
      • EIV interpretation allows for a robust methodology
      • Robust to specification changes
      • Even though they are anticipated
results3
Results
  • Macro variables and S&P
results4
Results
  • Macro variables, Fitch and Moody
results5
Results
  • S&P upgrades and downgrades
results6
Results
  • Typical event
lessons1
Lessons
  • Informational content
    • Around credit rating changes, ratings provide information beyond interest rates
      • EIV interpretation allows for a robust methodology
      • Robust to specification changes
      • Even though they are anticipated
  • Rating changes
    • Upgrades
      • Decrease future spreads (0.7% per notch)
      • Increase stock market (0.2% per notch)
      • Appreciate real exchange rate (0.2% per notch)
    • Downgrades
      • Decrease future spreads (0.6% per notch)
      • No impact on stock markets
      • No impact on exchange rates
results7
Results
  • Does changes in asset class have larger impact?
    • We find that changing the asset class has no additional effect for the rating variable.
  • What about outlook changes?
    • Replicate the results for outlook.
    • Estimate degree of anticipation using the outlook change prior to the rating change.
results8
Results
  • Using outlook in the specification
results9
Results
  • Outlook: days between outlook and change.
results10
Results
  • Degree of anticipation
conclusions
Conclusions
  • Ratings provide information in additional to interest rates
    • Different agencies provide different information
  • Rating upgrades
    • Reduce future interest rate spreads
    • Increase stock markets
    • Appreciate exchange rates
    • All even after controlling for, fixed effects, interest rate and VIX.
  • Robustness
    • Anticipation affects the quantitative results but not the qualitative message
    • Outlooks provide same conclusions
ad