1 / 41

Towards the perfect fluid strategy: Fluid strategy in hemorrhagic shock

Towards the perfect fluid strategy: Fluid strategy in hemorrhagic shock. Sibylle A. Kozek-Langenecker Evangelic Hospital Vienna www.perioperativebleeding.org sibylle.kozek@aon.at. Conflicts of interest. Honoraria for lectures and travel reimbursement: B. Braun Fresenius Kabi.

sabina
Download Presentation

Towards the perfect fluid strategy: Fluid strategy in hemorrhagic shock

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards the perfect fluid strategy: Fluid strategy in hemorrhagic shock Sibylle A. Kozek-Langenecker Evangelic Hospital Vienna www.perioperativebleeding.org sibylle.kozek@aon.at

  2. Conflicts of interest Honoraria for lectures and travel reimbursement: B. Braun Fresenius Kabi

  3. Definition: hemorrhage Severe bleeding: > 20% blood volume loss Massive bleeding: > 100% blood loss in 24 h > 50% blood loss in 3 h > 150 ml/min in 20 mins > 1.5 ml/kg/min in 20 mins > 6 U PRBC in 24 h Martinowitz. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 640

  4. Physiological basics intravascular interstitial intracellular water water Na+ Na+ Na+ K+ K+ K+ protein protein protein protein

  5. Physiological basics mod. Jacob 2012

  6. 45 litres

  7. intracellular space 30 litres

  8. extracellular space 15 litres

  9. interstitial space 12 litres

  10. intravascular space 3 litres

  11. Pathophysiological basics in hemorrhagic shock: intravascular compartment tissue perfusion in hemorrhagic shock: intravascular compartment tissue perfusion

  12. Fluid strategy in hemorrhagic shock in hemorrhagic shock: stopp bleeding intravascular compartment tissue perfusion

  13. Physiology-based fluid strategy in hemorrhagic shock infusion therapy fluid volume substitution replacement extracellular intravascular crystalloidcolloid AND

  14. Pharmacodynamics pure water

  15. Pharmacodynamics isotonic crystalloid

  16. Fluid substitution urine output extravascular deficits insensible perspiration evaporation 0.5-1 ml/kg/h Lamke. Acta Chir Scand 1977; 143: 279-84 Jacob M, Chappell D, Rehm M. Lancet 2007; 369: 1984-6

  17. Excessive crystalloid substitution Hypervolemia Jacob. Anaesthesist 2007, 56:747-64

  18. Keep the glycocalyx happy ☺ Chappell 2008 Chappell D. Cardiovascular Research 2009; 83:388–396

  19. Pharmacodynamics isooncotic colloid

  20. Volume efficacy Van der Linden. Review. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:S30-9

  21. Direct measurement of volume efficacy Proof of concept: isooncotic colloids act intravascular

  22. Context-sensitivity of volume efficacy Jacob. Lancet 2007, 369: 1984-6 in hemorrhagic shock: highest volume efficacy

  23. Context-sensitivity on the cover

  24. Pathomechanisms of massive bleeding Kozek. In: Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2007:847 Tissue trauma + Consumption Cut vesicles Tissue trauma + Hyperfibrinolysis Thrombomodulin / Protein C Pre-existing disorders Anticoagulation Antiplatelet drugs Blood loss Fluid resuscitation + Dilution Triad of Malfunction (hypothermia, acidosis, hypocalcaemia)

  25. Dilutional coagulopathy reversal hemodilution baseline Fries. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:1280 Innerhofer. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 858

  26. The ideal intravascular resuscitation fluid good volume efficacy no coagulopathic side effect no other relevant side effects

  27. 500 mL Hct: 38-45% Plt: 150-400K Coags: 100% 1:1:1 ratio concept: á 600 ml Armand & Hess. Transfusion Med Rev 2003 volume efficacy ? coagulopathy ? harms/burdens ? Plt 5.5x1010 50 mL FFP 80% 250mL PRBC Hct 55% 335 mL 1U PRBC + 1U PLT + 1U FFP: • factor activity 65% • Platelet count 87K • Hct 29%

  28. Concentrate-based concept: á 50 ml Schöchl. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2012; 20: 15 Minerva Anestesiol 2005 JSTEM 2012

  29. Dosing of fluids target parameters & safety aspects

  30. Acidosis ≠ acidosis Gunnerson. Crit Care 2006; 10:R22

  31. The FIRST Study: Lactate clearance Fluids In Resuscitationin Severe Trauma • similar static hemodynamic measurements between groups • superior tissue perfusion after HES James. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:693

  32. ESA guideline 2012Management of severe periOP bleeding 9-10 of November 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

  33. Colloidal patient safety issues „therapeutic window“ overload endothelial damage intraabdominal hypertension inadequate volume therapy death adverse outcomes coagulopathy & bleeding kidney dysfunction itching anaphylaxis dose of colloid

  34. Colloidal safety measures „therapeutic window“ individualized dosing IA pressure monitoring ? fluid monitoring and individualised dosing avoidance of adverse outcomes Choice of colloid anamnesis, awareness & symptomatic treatment dose of colloid

  35. Potential side effects of colloids - Coagulopathy beyond hemodilution Anesthesiology 2005;103:654. Transfus Altern Transfus Med 2007;9:173. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesth 2009; 23: 225

  36. Side effects on hemorrhagedextran > pentastarch > tetrastarch/gelatins ~ albumin maximum daily dose in massive bleeding ?

  37. Small volume resuscitation 30 pigs after 60% blood volume withdrawal intervention: 4 ml/kg hypertonic saline (7.2%) / HES (6% 200/0.62) 50 ml/kg 4% gelatin 41 ml/kg 6% tetrastarch MCF blood loss HS-HES 11 mm (10,11) 725 ml (375, 900) tetrastarch 3.5 mm (2.3,4) 1600 ml (1500,1800) gelatin 4.5 mm (3,5.8) 1625 ml (1275,1950) p = 0.0034 p =0.004 Haas. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1078

  38. Small volume resuscitation & outcome shock + blunt/penetrating trauma: no difference in mortality BUT increased mortality in subgroup without RBCs Bulger EM. JAMA. 2010; 304:1455-64 shock + traumatic brain injury: no difference in mortality and neurological outcome Cooper D. JAMA 2004; 291;1350-1357

  39. Conclusions heterogeneous fluid/procoagulant concepts existin a pathophysiology-based infusion concept: fluid substitution: balanced isotonic crystalloids volume replacement: isooncotic colloids hemodynamic monitoring: preload & metabolic parameters > HR & pressure parametersavoid hypervolemia monitoring of colloidal side effects:dependent on molecule, dosing, timing, endothelial barrier

  40. FRACTA 2013 February 7th-9th 2013 in Prague safe the date sybille.richter@fresenius-kabi.com

  41. Thank you for your attention ! www.perioperativebleeding.org sibylle.kozek@aon.at

More Related