1 / 15

Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

BES III Luminosity Monitor. Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan. Design Requirements. The luminosity monitor (LUM) is mainly for the quick feedback to the accelerator people for beam tuning. Requirements: Precision: 3-5%

sabin
Download Presentation

Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002 Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  2. Design Requirements • The luminosity monitor (LUM) is mainly for the quick feedback to the accelerator people for beam tuning. • Requirements: • Precision: 3-5% • Enough statistics for fast feedback • Radiation tolerant: 5 Krad/year • Fit in the limited space around • beam pipe, MDC and mini-b MDC • 8cm height (max.); 1.5cm in the front due to MDC electronics. • 9cm deep; 2p coverage not possible due to beam pipe support at the last 3cm. mini-b beam pipe Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  3. Available Space MDC mini-b beam pipe Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  4. Design Considerations • Particularity of this luminosity monitor: • Limited space and location => measure the luminosity by counting small angle Bhabha events. • There is no a strong need for fine energy resolution, hadronic (mainly p) background rejection does not require precise energy measurement => no need for expensive, homogeneous crystal calorimeter. • On the other hand, great rejection power can be achieved by selecting back-to-back events => Fine granularity (spatial resolution) detector. • Main uncertainty on luminosity measurement is in knowing well the acceptance, especially on the inner edge => need defining counter in front. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  5. Base Design: Silicon-Tungsten Preshower-like solution: Four 63x63mm2 modules placed at the either side of the beam pipe: R=65-98mm Z=515-538mm q=8-14o • Two reasons for such geometry: • Not possible 2p coverage due to the beam pipe support on top. • Avoid horizontal plane where there is high synchrotron radiation. • 4 modules makes debugging easier by comparing rates on each module. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  6. Silicon-Tungsten Preshower • Each module consists of: • Two tungsten converters of 14 mm (4X0) and 7mm (2X0) thickness. • Two shower maximum sampling layers of silicon strip sensors, one in X and the other in Y direction. • Silicon sensor: 320mm thick, 32 strips of 1.9mm pitch, 63mm long. • Silicon are made by ERSO in Taiwan for CMS Preshower detector, in production. • A defining counter is place right before the converters. Same ERSO silicon is used. The size is known to few mm. W W 7 14mm 63mm X Silicon strips Y Silicon strips Defining Counter Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  7. e/p Separation, Silicon-Tungsten From MC simulation (GEANT 3.21): • A 1.55GeV electron gives, on the average, 16 MIPs (1.9 MeV) on first layer and 12 MIPs (1.4 MeV) on second layer. Per strip: 9 MIPs and 5 MIPs respectively. • p leaves much less energy, typically a MIP (0.11 MeV). Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  8. e/p separation, Silicon-Tungsten • By cutting on deposited energy on each layer: • Good e acceptances and p rejection • Additional MC results: • Excellent spatial resolution (<0.7mm), will give excellent Bhabha acceptance with back-to-back selection. • Bhabha event rate: 2.3KHz • 3% (5%) luminosity measurement can be achieved with a mechanical precision of 0.5 (1)mm in the inner edge. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  9. Front-End Electronics • Several possibilities exists: • Delta Chip: Preamp-Shaper, designed specifically for the CMS Silicon. 50 MIP full rage, 25ns shaping time, radiation hard, S/N>10. • Amplex-SiCal chip, used in ALEPH luminosity monitor, 1000 MIP full rage, S/N>10. • Charge & Post Amplifier from EMC. Signals are taken out for triggering and DAQ. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  10. Back-up: Lead-Scintillating Fibers • Calorimeter-like solution: • 4 modules, 2 on each side of the beam. Each module covers p/2 in f direction, • Z=472.5-562.5mm; R=65-107.5mm. 12.5 X0; Moliere Radius~17.5mm. • 17 layers of 2.5mm Pb with 16 layers of 1mm scintillating fibers every 3mm (2776 fibers). 4 readout layers, 136 channels. • defining counter: plastic scintillator with same fibers and APD readout Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  11. Lead-Scintillating Fibers, details • At shower max (~6X0), the transverse shower profile is around 1X0 (~7.2mm), so we need a transverse granularity <<7mm => 1mm fiber, 2.5mm Pb. ~2800 photons on the hit APD. • Choice of Fiber: • Pol.Hi Tech’s 0046-100 (0044-100) has a peak response at 435nm (440nm), also rad hard specified to 1Mrad. • Bicron’s BCF-60 has peak response at 530nm and it is radiation tolerant (not specified how much) • Photodetector: ECAL APD is 5x5mm2 area, high sensitivity and low noise. 80% QE 400-650nm. Small nuclear counter effect. Rad hard (500Krad). • Read out electronics can be placed outside. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  12. Lead Scintillating Fibers, e/p separation • An electron deposits 13 MeV in all fibers. • p deposits less than 2 MeV, but with a long tail due to non-negligible nuclear interaction probability. • Worse p rejection power due to this nuclear interaction. Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  13. 32 Disc. Disc. 32 OR Disc. 32 32 32 32 Trigger • Trigger: based on back-to-back event selection • First level, on each module, fast • Hit on the defining counter • Energy deposited on each silicon layer over the threshold Defining Counter Analog sum X layer AND Hit Analog sum Y layer Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  14. 32 32 32 32 Trigger & DAQ • Second level, coincidence on opposite modules, FPGA, slower • First level trigger on the two opposite modules. • A/D conversion of both silicon layers, both modules. • Calculate hit position (R-f) using FPGA • Make coincidence decision (FPGA). • Count the rate, calculate the luminosity (FPGA). • DAQ: • Feed data into EMC data flow stream. X layer ADC Hit Position Upstream R Y layer ADC f Back-to- back Coinc. FPGA Rate & Luminosity Lum. R ADC X layer Hit Position FPGA Downstream f FPGA Y layer ADC FPGA Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

  15. Milestones and Conclusion • Schedule and Planning: • 2002.09 - 2003.06:Detector R&D, full MC simulation study. • 2003.06 - 2004.06:Prototype construction; test beam at CERN. • 2004.06 - 2005.06:Final detector construction and installation. • 2005.06 - 2006.06:Detector Commissioning. Conclusion: This is a relatively simple detector, we should be able to meet the target and build it on time! Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan

More Related