The ability of q methodology to study the character development of college students
Download
1 / 29

The ability of Q-Methodology to study the character development of college students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 70 Views
  • Uploaded on

The ability of Q-Methodology to study the character development of college students. Chris M. Ray Oklahoma State University. Introduction.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The ability of Q-Methodology to study the character development of college students' - saber


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The ability of q methodology to study the character development of college students

The ability of Q-Methodology to study the character development of college students

Chris M. Ray

Oklahoma State University


Introduction
Introduction development of college students

  • There is a common perception of decreasing values in America’s youth (Wynne, 1985). Violent crimes, teen pregnancy, and suicide have all been increasing in recent years.

  • Additionally, children’s self-report of cheating and lying in their personal and public lives is increasing (Murdock, et al, 2004).


Introduction contd
Introduction (contd.) development of college students

  • Recent scandals such as those involving the Enron Corporation and WorldCom indicate that these declines are not limited to children.

  • While these events are increasing the research regarding moral and character education, Q-methodology remains a rare exception.


Introduction contd1
Introduction (contd.) development of college students

  • Research suggests that individual perceptions are the best predictors of individual behavior and that educators’ beliefs influence their perceptions, judgments, and practices (Bandura, 1986; Dewey, 1933; Pajares, 1992; Rokeach, 1968).

  • As such, understanding the nature of beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions is essential to understanding choices, decisions, and effectiveness.


Q methodology
Q-Methodology development of college students

  • Introduced in 1935 by William Stephenson in a letter to Nature

  • In 1953, Stephenson published The Study of Behavior, which has provided the groundwork for later Q-research

  • Q is essentially “the scientific study of subjectivity” (McKeown & Thomas, 1988)


Concourse theory
Concourse Theory development of college students

  • A Concourse Defined:

    • “the flow of communicability surrounding any topic” (Brown, 1993, p. 94)

    • Essentially, it consists of all the ideas associated with any given research topic

  • Can be examined through interviews with individuals related to the research topic, or through the collection of ideas such as books, articles, newspaper clippings, radio or television recordings, etc.


The q sample
The Q-Sample development of college students

  • The Q-sample is a smaller selection of ideas that is used to represent the larger concourse.

    • Item Sources (McKeown & Thomas, 1988)

      • Naturalistic - statements taken directly from the target population

      • Ready Made - taken from an external source

    • Q-Sample Designs (McKeown & Thomas, 1988)

      • Structured - All areas of the concourse are uniformly covered

      • Unstructured - No attempt to create uniformity


The q sort
The Q-Sort development of college students

  • The actual process of ordering the statements.

  • Condition(s) of Instruction

    • The directions given to the participants that tell them how to compare the items

  • The completed Q-sort represents the subjective perspective of the participant (Brown, 1993)


Statistical analysis
Statistical Analysis development of college students

  • Data is then analyzed using three statistical procedures (Brown, 1993).

    • Correlation

    • Factor Analysis

    • Statistical Rotation

  • People, rather than traits, are correlated and factor analyzed


Factor interpretation
Factor Interpretation development of college students

  • Interpretation attempts to identify what is unique about each factor

  • Considerations for Interpretation

    • Distinguishing Statements

    • Extreme Statements

    • Consensus Items

    • Demographic Information


A sample study
A Sample Study development of college students

  • According to Colby, et. al. (1983a) and Gould (1978), character development has been determined to continue beyond the college years into the mid-30’s.

  • Research indicates that character education has a direct relationship to the development of individuals (Colby, Kohlberg, Gibbs & Lieberman, 1983a; Colby, et. al., 1983b; Rest, 1983; Kohlberg, 1969).


Purpose of study
Purpose of Study development of college students

  • The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of college faculty, staff, and students concerning the ways that higher education influences the character development of college students


Research questions
Research Questions development of college students

  • What are the perceptions of faculty, staff, and students regarding methods and approaches to the character development of college students?

  • How do current methods and approaches relate to ideal practices?

  • Are there any demographic differences among the various perceptions?


Method
Method development of college students

  • Q Method

  • Q-sort procedure

    • 48 statements

    • Range of -5 to +5

    • 2 conditions of instruction

      • What are ways that college students currently develop character and human values?

      • What are ways that college students could develop character and human values?

  • Demographic survey


Instrument development
Instrument Development development of college students

  • Quasi-naturalistic sample

    • Dalton’s (1985) “Values Activities Matrix”

  • Structured (deductive) factorial design

    • 3 Methods

    • 4 Approaches

    • 12 combinations, 4 statements each


Participants
Participants development of college students

  • Structured sample

    • Snowball sampling procedure

    • Factorial Design

      • Categories: Faculty, Staff, and Students

      • Levels: Male and Female

  • Actual Participants

    • Students: 11 (6 M, 5 F)

    • Staff: 10 (5 M, 5 F)

    • Faculty: 1 (1 M, 0 F)


Data analysis
Data Analysis development of college students

  • Data was analyzed using PQMethod (Schmolck, 2000).

    • Principal components factor analysis (PCA)

    • Varimax rotation

    • Q-analyzed


Results
Results development of college students

  • 6 sorts did not define any factor

    • 3 Confounded

    • 3 Non-significant


Participant perceptions
Participant Perceptions? development of college students

  • Factor A - Formal Learning

    • “Traditional settings are the key”

    • Strongest Defining Statements

      • By encountering appropriate role models (+5)

      • Through class discussions of moral issues (+5)

      • By being informed of institutional rules and regulations (-5)

      • Through participation in a committee reviewing student fees (-5)

    • Lecture style (transmission/assimilation)

    • Externally-imposed


Participant perceptions1
Participant Perceptions? development of college students

  • Factor B - Judicious Learning

    • “Rule systems shape character”

    • Strongest Defining Statements

      • By participating in individual counseling (+5)

      • Through successful mediation of conflicts (+5)

      • By participating in orientation classes (-5)

      • Through meetings with academic advisor (-5)

    • Experiential in nature

    • Self-imposed


Participant perceptions2
Participant Perceptions? development of college students

  • Factor C - Guided Learning

    • “Future preparation builds character”

    • Strongest Defining Statements

      • Through meetings with academic advisor (+5)

      • Through successful mediation of conflicts (+5)

      • By familiarizing themselves with the student code of conduct (-5)

      • Through participation in an advisory committee to develop a new campus policy (-5)

    • Utilizes a mentor / guide


Actual vs ideal
Actual vs. Ideal? development of college students


Demographic differences
Demographic Differences? development of college students

Position


Demographic differences1
Demographic Differences? development of college students

Gender


Demographic differences2
Demographic Differences? development of college students

Age


Conclusions
Conclusions development of college students

  • Actual vs. Ideal

    • “Guided Learning” (Factor C) is perceived to occur, though it doesn’t seem to be perceived as ideal

    • There were no major differences between actual and ideal for the other two factors

  • Demographic Differences

    • Position - Staff tend to view judicial systems as the primary effort whereas students and faculty tend to view the formal setting as the primary effort

    • Gender - Factor C seems to be predominately male (all sorters were male)

    • Age - Most sorters for Factor A were 18-25, whereas most sorters for Factor B were 26-33


Discussion
Discussion development of college students

  • Character education research is highly complex

    • Lack of clear definition of “character” and “character education”

    • Knowledge, interest, and commitment from the leader and others involved

    • Perceptions of school community have an impact

    • Requires transmission of subjective values


Discussion1
Discussion development of college students

  • All of these issues can be explored using Q-methodology

  • As such, Q can serve a much-needed role within the study of character education


Questions

Questions? development of college students


ad