Heartsink Patients. Coined by O'Dowd in 1988Following a 5 year study within his PracticeSome
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
1. HEARTSINK PATIENTS
Dr J Sperring
2. Heartsink Patients Coined by O’Dowd in 1988
Following a 5 year study within his Practice
Some “heartsinks” were identified (NB Not randomised) and were discussed over 6 months, with problems defined, management plans introduced and support provided for the key clinician.
Those discussed tended to consult less, and more frequently consulted with the same doctor
3. Heartsink Patients Female > male
Low education and social class
Associated with chronic disease
Each GP has an estimated 1 to 50 pts on their list, with a median of 6
4. Attend with: Long and frequent consultations
Delight when a treatment fails
Failure to take responsibility for their own actions (smoking, obesity)
A shopping list!
Demands for specific treatment
Requests for inappropriate certificates
5. Groves 1978 classified 4 types: Entitled Demander: perceives the physician as a barrier to receiving services, can use intimidation. They play the “I’m going to take this further” game.
Dependent Clinger: excessively dependent on the physician for reassurance, and returns constantly with an array of symptoms. They play the “poor me” game.
Manipulative Help-rejecter: sabotages suggested therapies, they play the “yes but” game
Self-destructive Denier: makes no lifestyle contributions to his or her own health and refuses to accept that their behaviour has an effect on their health. The game they play is “kick me””
6. Barsky outlined a management plan: Rule out serious diagnosis, review notes etc. Beware investigating/referring too much as may exacerbate problem.
Look for a psychiatric diagnosis i.e. depression, anxiety.
Form a collaborative alliance with the patient – see one Doctor regularly, decide frequencies of visits, listen – called “holding” NB beware the Doctor as a drug!!!!
Set goals for treatment i.e.. Decreasing symptoms/improve coping strategies as opposed to cure. INVOLVE the patient.
Provide limited reassurance, i.e. we have excluded a serious illness, try instead to shift focus to coping with symptoms rather than pathology.
Prescribe CBT/anti-depressants if none of the above work.
7. Effect on the Doctor – avoid Burnout! Can be very frustrating, important to deal with feelings evoked (through transference), also insecurity and a sense of failure
Goes against what we do everyday – solve medical problems and help people!
Doesn’t fit in nicely with the biomedical model we use daily – identifying specific diseases, ordering investigations and prescribing effective treatments
Neighbours theory of housekeeping
Consider Balint group/discuss with colleagues
8. Every patient a heartsink? If there is a problem with the Dr-Pt relationship it is not necessarily the patients fault
Different doctors attract different numbers of heartsinks, indicating that Doctor factors play a large role (Female GP’s apparently collect more!)
The same patient may not induce a feeling of heartsink in every doctor they see (Gerrd and Riddell 1998).
Doctor factors (MODIFIABLE):
Greater perceived workload
Lower job satisfaction
Lack of postgraduate qualifications
Lack of training in communication skills
And don’t forget there may be HEARTSINK DOCTORS – pts may dread seeing you!
BEWARE THE DAY WHEN THEY HAVE A GENUINE ILLNESS
“hope lies more in getting the doctor to cope than in getting the patient to change her ways”
Dr Paul Hewish 2004