1 / 37

LCDM vs. SUGRA

LCDM vs. SUGRA. Betti Numbers : Dark Energy models. On the Alpha and Betti of the Cosmos Topology and Homology of the Cosmic Web. Pratyush Pranav Warsaw 12 th -17 th July.

ryder
Download Presentation

LCDM vs. SUGRA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LCDM vs. SUGRA

  2. Betti Numbers : Dark Energy models

  3. On the Alpha and Betti of the CosmosTopology and Homology of the Cosmic Web PratyushPranav Warsaw 12th-17th July

  4. Rien van de Weygaert, GertVegter, Herbert Edelsbrunner,Changbom Park, Bernard Jones, PravabatiChingangbam, Michael Kerber, WojciechHellwing , Marius Cautun, Patrick Bos, Johan Hidding, MathijsWintraecken ,Job Feldbrugge, Bob Eldering, NicoKruithof, Matti van Engelen, ElineTenhave , Manuel Caroli, Monique Teillaud

  5. LSS/Cosmic web Topology/Homology (Euler chr., genus, Betti Numbers) Methods Models and Result Conclusions

  6. The Cosmic Web Stochastic Spatial Pattern of  Clusters,  Filaments &  Walls around  Voids in which matter & galaxies have agglomerated through gravity

  7. Why Cosmic Web? Physical Significance:  Manifests mildly nonlinear clustering: Transition stage between linear phase and fully collapsed/virialized objects  Weblike configurations contain cosmological information: e.g. Void shapes & alignments (recent study J. Lee 2007)  Cosmic environment within which to understand the formation of galaxies.

  8. LSS/Cosmic web Topology/Homology (Euler chr., genus, Betti Numbers) Methods Models and Result Conclusions

  9. Genus, Euler & Betti • For a surface with c components, the genus G specifies  handles on • surface, and is related to the Euler characteristic () via: • where •  Euler characteristic 3-D manifold  & 2-D boundary manifold :

  10. Genus, Euler & Betti •  Euler – Poincare formula • Relationship between Betti Numbers & Euler Characteristic :

  11. Cosmic Structure Homology • Complete quantitative characterization of homology in terms of • Betti Numbers • Betti number k: - rank of homology groups Hp of manifold • - number of k-dimensional holes of an • object or shape • 3-D object, e.g. density superlevel set: • 0: -  independent components • 1: -  independent tunnels • 2: -  independent enclosed voids

  12. LSS/Cosmic web Topology/Homology (Euler chr., genus, Betti Numbers) Methods Models and Result Conclusions

  13. The Cosmic Web • Web Discretely Sampled: • By far, most information • on the Cosmic Web concerns • discrete samples: • observational: • Galaxy Distribution • theoretical: • N-body simulation particles

  14. LSS Distance Function Density Function Filtration Lower-star Filtration Alphashapes Betti Numbers/Persistence

  15. Alphashapes • Exploiting the topological information contained in the Delaunay Tessellation of the galaxy distribution • Introduced by Edelsbrunner & collab. (1983, 1994) • Description of intuitive notion of the shape of a discrete point set • subset of the underlying triangulation

  16. Delaunay simplices within spheres radius 

  17. DTFE • Delaunay Tessellation Field Estimator • Piecewise Linear representation • density & other discretely sampled fields • Exploits sample density & shape sensitivity of • Voronoi & Delaunay Tessellations • Density Estimates from contiguous Voronoi cells • Spatial piecewise linear interpolation by means of • Delaunay Tessellation

  18. Persistence : search for topological reality Concept introduced by Edelsbrunner: Reality of features (eg. voids) determined on the basis of -interval between “birth” and “death” of features Pic courtsey H. Edelsbrunner

  19. Persistence in the Cosmic Context • Natural description for hierarchical structure formation • Can probe structures at all cosmic-scale • Filtering mechanism – can be used to concentrate on structures persistent in a in a specific range of scales

  20. LSS/Cosmic web Topology/Homology (Euler chr., genus, Betti Numbers) Methods Models and Result Conclusions

  21. VoronoiKinematic Model: evolving mass distribution in Voronoi skeleton

  22. Voids: Voronoi Evolutionary models Density function Distance function

  23. Betti Space & Alpha Track

  24. Void evolution Voronoi Points shift away from diagonal as voids grow General reduction in compactness of points on persistence diagram Fig : Persistence Diagram of Void Growth

  25. Soneira-Peebles Model • Mimics the self-similarity of observed angular distribution of galaxies on sky • Adjustable parameters • 2-point correlation can be evaluated analytically Correlation function : Fractal Dimension :

  26. Betti Numbers :Soneira-Peebles models Density function Distance function

  27. Homology Analysisofevolving LCDM cosmology

  28. Betti2:evolving void populations

  29. LCDM void persistence

  30. LCDM vs. SUGRA

  31. Betti Numbers : Dark Energy models

  32. Persistent LCDM Cosmic Web Death  Birth 

  33. LSS/Cosmic web Topology/Homology (Euler chr., genus, Betti Numbers) Methods Models and Result Conclusions

  34. Betti Numbers • Signals from all scales in a multi-scale distribution – suitable for hierarchical LSS. • Signals from different morphological components of the LSS – discriminator for filamentary/wall-like topology. Persistence • Persistence as a probe for analyzing the systematics of matter distribution as a function of single parameter “life interval” (hierarchy) • Persistence robust against small scale noise • Data doesn’t need to be smoothed.

  35. Gaussian Random Fields:Betti Numbers Distinct sensitivity of Betti curves on power spectrum P(k): unlike genus (only amplitude P(k) sensitive)

More Related