1 / 12

National Qualifications Framework Bill

National Qualifications Framework Bill. Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Education 30 July 2008. Focus of the SAOU’S comments. The objectives of the NQF (Legislator’s intention) versus the rest of the Bill Representivity of the SAQA Board and Quality Councils

ryder-larson
Download Presentation

National Qualifications Framework Bill

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Qualifications Framework Bill Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Education 30 July 2008 SAOU Curriculum Services

  2. Focus of the SAOU’S comments SAOU Curriculum Services The objectives of the NQF (Legislator’s intention) versus the rest of the Bill Representivity of the SAQA Board and Quality Councils Responsibilities of the Ministers

  3. Objectives of NQF SAOU Curriculum Services Create an integrated national framework for learning achievements Facilitate access to, and mobility and progression within, education, training and career paths

  4. What the objectives mean: Intention of the Legislator SAOU Curriculum Services An integrated system of national qualifications which will make it possible to let all learning achievements of individuals count towards their progression within and between education, training and career paths.

  5. Approach: SAQA Act versus NQF Act SAQA Act: A Programmes Approach NQF Bill: A Systems Approach SAOU Curriculum Services

  6. Why the NQF under the SAQA Act has not performed as expected SAOU Curriculum Services SAQA did not use the powers which it had in terms of the Act to generate the necessary involvement of the role players and stake-holders in standard setting The universities in particular did not provide the expertise which is required for the setting of standards at the ten levels The level descriptors were ineffective and did not make the equation of qualifications pos-sible

  7. Why the NQF under the NQF Bill (Act) will not perform ito the objectives SAOU Curriculum Services The Bill does not give SAQA the powers to ensure the co-operation of the Quality Councils The Bill’s description of the NQF, specifically the levels, does not provide sufficient detail For SAQA and the QC’s to reach agreement on the level descriptors, the descriptors will have to be reduced to that which is acceptable to the three QC’s. This will make the equation of qualifications questionable. The Bill does not emphasise the importance of the academic disciplines in the setting of standards

  8. An integrated framework requires a common knowledge core SAOU Curriculum Services

  9. Proposal 1: Objectives, Design of NQF, Functions of SAQA SAOU Curriculum Services • The objectives should envisage the NQF as a national framework of co-ordinated sub-frameworks for learn-ingachievements (not integrated) • If the objectives remain unchanged (integrated frame-work), then in order to ensure their achievement: • The Bill should give SAQA more authority over the QC’s, OR • The Bill should indicate the levels which apply in the case of each sub-framework; • The Bill should determine criteria for the formulation of the level descriptors or state that the Minister will determine such criteria; • Section 14(1)(g) should determine that SAQA will perform this function subject to the criteria determined by the Minister; and • The Bill should determine that expertise in the basic knowledge disciplines should be involved in all standard setting activities. • The SAOU proposes the first option

  10. Proposal 2: Representivity of SAQA and the QC’s SAOU Curriculum Services The Bill addresses only the composition of the SAQA Board (not the QC’s) Teachers are important role players and should be represented on the three QC’s (representation on the SAQA Board is less important) Teacher unions represent teachers; the NQF and/or the QC Amendment Bills and Skills Development Bill should therefore ensure representation of the teacher unions on the QC’s

  11. Proposal 3: Responsibility of Ministers SAOU Curriculum Services • Section 9(1) determines that • the Minister has executive responsibility for the NQF, SAQA and two QC’s, while • the Minister of Labour has executive responsibility for the third QC. • Section 8 determines that the Minister must discharge his responsibilities in consultation with the Minister of Labour. • The question that arises is whether • this is acceptable ito the Constitution and whether • it could possibly impact negatively on the functioning of the NQF system • The SAOU proposes that legal advice be obtained on these questions.

  12. In summary: SAOU Curriculum Services The objectives should envisage a co-ordinated rather than integrated framework. If they were to remain unchanged, the framework should be described in greater detail with the emphasis on the importance of academic disciplines in the setting of standards. Teacher unions should be represented on the Quality Councils Experts should advise on the viability of two Ministers being given executive responsibility for the NQF and/or parts thereof

More Related