1 / 10

Minnesota’s Experience in Implementing the Use of Shingles

Minnesota’s Experience in Implementing the Use of Shingles. Roger Olson Research Operations Engineer Minnesota Dept. of Transportation. History in MN Based on Manufacturers’ Shingle Scrap. Mn/DOT and U of MN lab tests (Newcomb, 1993) Willard Munger Trail (1990)

ryan-kidd
Download Presentation

Minnesota’s Experience in Implementing the Use of Shingles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Minnesota’s Experience in Implementing the Use of Shingles Roger Olson Research Operations Engineer Minnesota Dept. of Transportation

  2. History in MN Based onManufacturers’ Shingle Scrap • Mn/DOT and U of MN lab tests (Newcomb, 1993) • Willard Munger Trail (1990) • Hwy 25 south of Mayer, MN (1991) • Scott County Hwy 17South of Shakopee, MN (1991) • Hennepin County France Avenue (2002) • U.S. Highway 10 – (2006)

  3. TH 25 Test Section

  4. First Mn/DOT SpecAdopted in 1996 • Allowed 5% recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) • Allowed in wear and non-wear courses • Job-by-job approval by Project Engineer required • Added like recycled asphalt pavement (RAP)

  5. Mn/DOT Spec “Guidelines” (circa 2000) • On file with Bituminous Office • Contaminants must be removed • Certification of supply required • Manufactured waste only • Mn/DOT to certify suppliers

  6. Spec Implementation • Mn/DOT specification 2360/2350 – 5% manufacturers RAS allowed- approval now permissive (2004 spec change) • Virgin asphalt binder must be70% or greater of total in HMA(2006 spec change)

  7. Tear-off Shingle Pilot Projects • City of St. Paul (2003) • Dakota County / OEA Lab Study (2005 – 2006) • Hassan / Omann (2006) • Ramsey County Lower Afton Trail (2007)

  8. Ramsey County LAT Project:Tear-off Shingle Spec • Funded in part by Mn/DOT State Aid • County approached Mn/DOT • Specification was drafted by Mn/DOT with guidelines • Ramsey County reviewed and approved specification

  9. On–Going Research • Minnesota SWMCB – Mn/DOT“Technical Working Group” • Research Grant from Mn/PCA ($50,000) • Future Mn/DOT Participation inFederal / State Pooled Fund Study

More Related