1 / 23

Rebuttal Panel Briefing

Rebuttal Panel Briefing. Heather Madey Specialized Advisory Unit, CRSAS, HRSD May 2019. Learning Objectives. After this presentation you should have a good understanding of: The Rebuttal process; The scope of the rebuttal panel’s review;

ruthc
Download Presentation

Rebuttal Panel Briefing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rebuttal Panel Briefing Heather Madey Specialized Advisory Unit, CRSAS, HRSD May 2019

  2. Learning Objectives After this presentation you should have a good understanding of: • The Rebuttal process; • The scope of the rebuttal panel’s review; • Your roles and responsibilities as a rebuttal panel member; and • What you are deciding as a rebuttal panel member. After this presentations you should be able to: • Determine if the staff member’s performance warranted the rating assigned; • Justify your determination in a well reasoned report; and • Ensure the integrity of the rebuttal process.

  3. When Can a Staff Member Rebut? ST/AI/2010/5 Performance Management and Development SystemSection 15.1 • Staff members can only rebut an overall rating of • Partially meets performance expectations, or • Does not meet performance expectations. • Staff members cannot rebut a rating of • Successfully meets performance expectations, or • Exceeds performance expectations. • Comments cannot be rebutted.

  4. Initiating a Rebuttal ST/AI/2010/5 Performance Management and Development SystemSection 15.1 • Staff member has 14 calendar days, after signing their completed performance document, to submit a rebuttal statement to their Executive Office or the Director/Chief of Administration/ Director of Mission Support.

  5. Rebuttal Statement ST/AI/2010/5 Performance Management and Development SystemSection 15.1 and 15.2 • The written rebuttal statement should set forth the specific reasons why a higher overall rating should be given. • The statement should contain the names of three individuals from the pre-approved list, selected by the staff member, to serve on the rebuttal panel. • Each selected panel member must be equal in grade or higher than the first reporting officer whose evaluation is being rebutted. • The statement may be accompanied by supporting documentation.

  6. Rebuttal Panel ListST/AI/2010/5 Performance Management and Development SystemSection 14.1 • The head of each department/office/mission shall draw up a list of rebuttal panel members composed of three groups of staff from the department/office/mission concerned, in equal numbers: • Panel members designated by the head of department/office/mission. • Panel members designated by the staff representatives of the department/office/mission in accordance with local practice. • Panel chairpersons selected by the head of the department/office/mission after consultation with staff representatives.

  7. After Staff Member Submits Rebuttal Statement…ST/AI/2010/5 Performance Management and Development System15.3 • The head of department/office/mission or their representative (normally the first reporting officer) has 14 days to submit a brief written reply to the staff member’s rebuttal statement. • The reply may be accompanied by documentation.

  8. Confidentiality Agreement /Conflicts of Interest • All panel members should sign a confidentiality agreement before receiving any information concerning the rebuttal. • All panel members should declare in writing any close relationships to the staff member or other actual/potential/perceived conflicts of interest.

  9. Relevant Documents • The rebuttal panel members review all relevant documents, both individually and collectively. • Written rebuttal statement from the staff member. • Reply to the rebuttal statement from the first reporting officer or head of department/office/mission. • Performance document under consideration. • At any stage during the process, the panel may request additional information. • HR should keep a log and copy of all documents received.

  10. Role of the Chairperson • The panel is headed by a chairperson chosen by the staff member from the rebuttal panel list. • Role of chairperson: • Leads the panel to ensure the prompt and effective review and resolution of rebuttal case. • The chairperson calls a meeting of the panel as soon as possible after receipt of all documentation.

  11. Role of Human Resources • An HR officer or a PM focal point should be performing the role of adviser/expert. That role should be limited to clarifying questions on policy and procedure and providing administrative support. The adviser/ex officer should: • Instruct all parties on the rebuttal process; • Convene the rebuttal panel; • Provide guidance on policy and procedure; • Explain rebuttal panel report template (template provided); • Perform administrative tasks; • Keep a record of all documents provided throughout the process.

  12. What is the Panel Deciding? • Whether staff member’s performance warranted the rating assigned. • Whether the staff member was advised that their performance was lacking. • Were remedial actions taken to address shortcomings.

  13. The UN Performance Management Cycle START : April MID: October END: March • Start workplan and set SMART goals. • (Deadline: May) • Review goals, have a face to face conversation and give feedback. • (Deadline: November) • Review goals, have a face to face conversation, write comments & rate performance. • (Deadline: June)

  14. Roles and Responsibilities of Staff Member • Understanding organizational goals. • Asking for clarification on performance expectations. • Participating in discussions with the FRO. • Completing each stage of the process on time.

  15. Roles and Responsibilities of FRO • Developing the workplan with the staff member. • Conducting the midpoint review and final evaluation. • Providing ongoing feedback, advice, support and coaching. • Ensuring compliance with the ST/AI.

  16. Roles and Responsibilities of SRO • Ensuring the FRO knows and applies the rules. • Holding the FRO accountable for fair and timely appraisals. • Providing feedback and evaluating the FRO’s performance & managerial ability. • Resolving disagreements between staff member and FRO. • Overseeing the performance improvement plan (if chosen by the FRO as a remedial measure).

  17. Guiding Principles for the Panel • Keep an open mind. • Try to be objective. • Try no to identify with any role. • Remember there are no winners or losers.

  18. First Panel Meeting • During the first meeting, panel members should: • Allocate responsibilities among each member. • Discuss the information provided and agree on what elements need to be clarified. • Schedule appointments for individual interviews with the staff member, the first and second reporting officer, and other individuals who may have information relevant to the case. • Decide which questions will be asked during the interviews.

  19. Interviews • All panel members must be present. • The panel must interview the staff member, the FRO and the SRO (Section. 15.3). • Interview questions should relate to: • Whether staff member’s performance warranted the rating assigned. • Whether staff member was advised that their performance was lacking. • Were remedial actions taken to address shortcomings.

  20. Decision of the Rebuttal Panel • The panel can only: • Maintain the original rating, or • Designate a new rating. • The panel cannot make recommendations or suggestions, nor can they modify comments made in the performance document nor change the ratings of the core values and individual competencies. • The panel’s decision must be justified in a report.

  21. Report of the Rebuttal Panel • Should: • Summarize the staff member’s, FRO’s and SRO’s arguments. • Briefly outline the methodology undertaken by the panel. • State the decision of the panel and the reasons for reaching that decision.

  22. What Happens to the Panels Report? • The report is sent by the human resources office (panel HR adviser/expert) to the Director/Chief of Administration or Director/Chief of Mission Support. • The Director/Chief of Administration or Director/Chief of Mission Support must inform the staff member of the panel’s decision and provide him/her with a copy of the panel’s report within 5 days of receipt of the final report by the panel. • The rebuttal panel’s report is also communicated to the first and second reporting officers. • The original report of the rebuttal panel is placed in the staff member’s official status file as an attachment to the completed e-Performance document.

  23. QUESTIONS?

More Related