1 / 21

# Part IIA, Paper 1 Consumer and Producer Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Part IIA, Paper 1 Consumer and Producer Theory. Lecture 4 Revealed Preferences and Consumer Welfare Flavio Toxvaerd. Today’s Outline. Leftovers from Lecture 2 Revealed preferences WARP, SARP, GARP Indices . Primal Approach. Dual Approach. Duality. Integrability problem. Solve. Solve.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Part IIA, Paper 1 Consumer and Producer Theory' - rune

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Part IIA, Paper 1Consumer and Producer Theory

Lecture 4

Revealed Preferences and Consumer Welfare

Flavio Toxvaerd

• Leftovers from Lecture 2

• Revealed preferences

• WARP, SARP, GARP

• Indices

Dual Approach

Duality

Integrability problem

Solve

Solve

Marshallian Demand

x1(p,m) and x2(p,m)

Hicksian Demand

Equivalent if

Substitute into cost equation

Roy’s Identity

Substitute into u(x,y)

Shephard’s Lemma

Indirect Utility

v(p,m)

Invert

Expenditure Function

Following a price change,

p1

a

b

Marshallian Demand

x1

• Question: What can we say about consumer preferences from observations of choice decisions?

• Recall ‘rationality’ assumption: Consumers select ‘most preferred’ option available

• So observed selection has been revealed as ‘preferred’ to all other available options

If, at prices p1 , p2 and income m, a consumer purchases a consumption bundle a, then this bundle is said to have been Directly Revealed Preferred to all other affordable bundles

x2

a

x1

No two different bundles, a and b, can be directly revealed preferred to each other

That is, if at prices (p1,p2) bundle (a1,a2) is chosen, and at prices (q1,q2) bundle (b1,b2) is chosen, then it cannot be the case that

, b affordable when a chosen

, a affordable when b chosen

x2

Graphically, we cannot have

a

b

x1

If a bundle a is directly revealed preferred to a different bundle b, and bundle b is directly revealed preferred to an alternative bundle c, then we can say that bundle a is Indirectly Revealed Preferredto bundle c.

x2

a

b

c

x1

• No two different bundles, a and c, can be either directly or indirectly revealed preferred to each other

• Note that both the strong and weak axioms of revealed preference require consumers to select a unique consumption bundle at any budget constraint

• If bundle a is indirectly revealed preferred to bundle c then whenever c is purchased the purchase of awould have been more expensive, that is pca pcc

• This is a more general specification, as it allows the consumer to be indifferent between two affordable consumption bundles. Effectively allowing flat spots in the indifference curves

Afriat’s Theorem

• For any finite number of price/consumption observations, there exists a continuous utility functions satisfying the condition that more is better, and with convex indifference curves which ‘rationalises’ the data if and only if the observations satisfy GARP

• Here is Homo Economicus

• Is the utility function obtained by this process unique?

NO!

• Utility functions are ordinal, so the same set of indifference curves may be generated by many different utility functions

• Practically, any finite number of observations may be ‘explained’ by a number of different indifference maps, each generating different ‘out-of-sample’ behaviour

• Consider a consumer who, in some base period, is observed consuming a bundle b when prices are pb and in some subsequent period is observed consuming bundle c when prices are pc

• Can anything be said about the welfare of this consumer over the interval?

• From revealed preference: If pb.b > pb.c then the consumer is worse off. If pc.c > pc.b then the consumer is better off

Laspeyres Quantity Index

Paasche Quantity Index

Laspeyres Quantity Index

Paasche Quantity Index

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the proportional change in the cost of purchasing a ‘given’ bundle of commodities. Specifically,

The CPI is commonly compared with the growth in nominal incomes to assess ‘real’ income changes

Is this comparison justifiable?

If CPI < M (ratio of incomes) then consumers are better off.

But if CPI > M cannot conclude that consumers are worse off.

x2

u0

Increasing incomes by CPI will generally improve welfare

c

b

x1

• Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics, chapter 7

• Varian, Microeconomic Analysis, chapter 8

• Samuelson P. (1948) ‘Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference’ Econometrica, vol. 15, pp. 243-253.

• Welfare

• Consumer surplus

• Equivalent variation

• Compensating variation

• Slutsky vs Hicksian substitution