1 / 28

Raptiva TM (efalizumab) Efficacy

Raptiva TM (efalizumab) Efficacy. Lee Kaiser, PhD Director Clinical Biostatistics Genentech, Inc. Phase III Studies. Conclusions About Raptiva Efficacy. Significant efficacy at Week 12 Onset of efficacy by Week 4 Psoriasis returns when Raptiva stopped Significant efficacy on retreatment

rufin
Download Presentation

Raptiva TM (efalizumab) Efficacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RaptivaTM (efalizumab) Efficacy Lee Kaiser, PhD DirectorClinical Biostatistics Genentech, Inc.

  2. Phase III Studies

  3. Conclusions About Raptiva Efficacy • Significant efficacy at Week 12 • Onset of efficacy by Week 4 • Psoriasis returns when Raptiva stopped • Significant efficacy on retreatment • Efficacy improves with continuous treatment past 12 weeks

  4. Study 2390:Pivotal Phase III Efficacy Study Entrance criteria • Plaque psoriasis ≥ 6 months • BSA ≥ 10% • PASI ≥ 12 • Candidate for, or history of, systemic therapy Placebo (n = 187) Screen Raptiva 1 mg/kg (n = 369) Randomization Day 0 Primary Analysis Week 12 (Day 84)

  5. Study 2390: Primary Efficacy Variable, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index • Physician-performed assessment • Extent of psoriasis and the degree of plaque erythema, thickness, and scaling • Index ranges from 0 to 72, higher scores worse Primary analysis based on rate of PASI-75 response • PASI-75 responder: A patient with a PASI percent improvement from baseline of ≥ 75% • PASI-75 nonresponder: A patient with a PASI percent improvement from baseline of < 75%

  6. Study 2390: Secondary Efficacy Endpoints • Physician-derived assessments • PASI-50 • PASI % improvement from baseline • Physician’s Global Assessments as given in briefing book • Patient-reported assessments • DLQI: Dermatology Life Quality Index • 10 items, each rated 0=Not at All, 1=A Little, 2=A Lot, 3=Very Much, or Not Relevant • Others as given in briefing book

  7. Study 2390: Demographics

  8. Study 2390: Baseline Characteristics

  9. n = 187 n = 369 Significant Effect on the Primary Endpoint:Rate of PASI-75 at Week 12 Study 2390 * * p < 0.001 % of patients with PASI-75 * Fisher’s exact test, Raptiva vs. placebo, ITT analysis

  10. A PASI-75 Response Baseline Week 12 PASI = 45 PASI = 2 95% improvement

  11. A PASI-50 Response Baseline Week 12 PASI = 14 67% improvement PASI = 43

  12. n = 187 n = 369 Significant Effect on Rate of PASI-50 at Week 12 Study 2390 * * p < 0.001 % of patients with PASI-50 * Fisher’s exact test, Raptiva vs. placebo, ITT analysis

  13. Significant Effects on Dermatology Life Quality Index at Week 12 Study 2390 * * p < 0.001 Mean DLQI Improvement Note: Mean baseline DLQI = 12 in each treatment group * Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Raptiva vs. placebo

  14. Percent of Patients with DLQI Problems Rated ‘A Lot’ or ‘Very Much’ Study 2390 Raptiva 1 mg/kg % of patients Dermatology Life Quality Index Item

  15. PASI-75 Rates at Week 12 in Placebo-Controlled Studies: Raptiva Superior to Placebo in Each Study * p < 0.001 * * * * % of patients with PASI-75 2600 (n = 686) 2058 (n = 332) 2059 (n = 354) 2390 (n = 556) Study * Fisher’s exact test, Raptiva vs. placebo, ITT analysis

  16. PASI-75 Rates at Week 12 in Placebo-Controlled Studies: Raptiva Superior to Placebo in Each Study * p < 0.001 * * * * * * % of patients with PASI-75 2390 (n = 556) 2600 (n = 686) 2058 (n = 498) 2059 (n = 597) Study * Fisher’s exact test, Raptiva vs. placebo, ITT analysis

  17. PASI-50 Rates at Week 12Raptiva Superior to Placebo in Each Study * p < 0.001 * * * * * * % of patients with PASI-50 2390 (n = 556) 2600 (n = 686) 2058 (n = 498) 2059 (n = 597) Study * Fisher’s exact test, Raptiva vs. placebo, ITT analysis

  18. Conclusions About Raptiva Efficacy • Significant efficacy at Week 12 • Onset of efficacy by Week 4 • Psoriasis returns when Raptiva stopped • Significant efficacy on retreatment • Efficacy improves with continuous treatment past 12 weeks

  19. * * p < 0.001 * * * Mean ± SE % improvement from baseline * Study Week Mean PASI % Improvement Over Time Study 2390 * Hierarchical t-test, Raptiva vs. placebo

  20. * p < 0.001 * * * Mean ± SE DLQI improvement Study Week Mean DLQI Improvement Over Time Study 2390 * Hierarchical rank-sum test, Raptiva vs. placebo

  21. Conclusions About Raptiva Efficacy • Significant efficacy at Week 12 • Onset of efficacy by Week 4 • Psoriasis returns when Raptivastopped • Significant efficacy on retreatment • Efficacy improves with continuous treatment past 12 weeks

  22. Study 2058: First 12 Weeks of Treatment, Observation, and Retreatment Placebo Raptiva Placebo Relapse * Retreatment for 12 weeks Screen Raptiva 1 or 2 mg/kg ObservationPeriod PASI 75 Randomization Day 0 Week 12 (Day 84) * Relapse was the loss of at least half of a patient’s PASI improvement at Week 12 of the treatment period.

  23. 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Time to Relapse for Subjects with PASI-75 Response after 12 Weeks of Treatment Study 2058, Observation Period (n = 107) Proportion Relapsed Weeks Since Last Dose Relapse is the loss of 50% of the PASI improvement at Week 12

  24. Raptiva is Effective upon Retreatment PASI Response Rates after 12 weeks of Retreatment in Relapsing Patients with a Previous PASI-75 Response Study 2058, Retreatment Period * p < 0.001 * % of Patients * * Fisher’s exact test, Raptiva vs. placebo, ITT analysis

  25. Conclusions About Raptiva Efficacy • Significant efficacy at Week 12 • Onset of efficacy by Week 4 • Psoriasis returns when Raptiva stopped • Significant efficacy on retreatment • Efficacy improves with continuous treatment past 12 weeks

  26. Studies 2390 and 2391 Study 2390 Study 2391 Placebo(n = 187) Raptiva 1 mg/kg Screen Raptiva 1 mg/kg (n = 369) Raptiva 1 mg/kg Randomization Day 0 Week 24(Day 168) Week 12(Day 84)

  27. Continued Treatment with Raptiva 1 mg/kg:PASI Response Rates at Weeks 12 and 24 Studies 2390 and 2391 PASI Response: * p ≤ 0.002 * 66% 59% % of Patients * 44% 27% Week 12 and 24 rates each based on 369 patients randomized to Raptiva on Day 0 of Study 2390 * McNemar’s test, Week 24 vs. Week 12

  28. Efficacy of Raptiva - Summary • Significant efficacy of Raptiva at 1 mg/kg for 12 weeks • PASI-75 response rate of 27% • PASI-50 response rate of 59% • Quality of life and patient-reported symptoms improved • Efficacy demonstrated at 4 weeks • Median time to relapse approximately 2 months • Raptiva is effective on retreatment • Improved efficacy with continuous treatment past 12 weeks • PASI-75 response rate of 44% at Week 24

More Related