1 / 79

MIMO for 5G Mobile Communications

MIMO Wireless Communications over Generalized Fading Channels. MIMO for 5G Mobile Communications. Dr. Brijesh Kumbhani Prof. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum. Introduction. Point-to-point MIMO: Discussed in previous chapters Single transmitter single receiver

rruff
Download Presentation

MIMO for 5G Mobile Communications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MIMO Wireless Communications over Generalized Fading Channels MIMO for 5G Mobile Communications Dr. BrijeshKumbhani Prof. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum

  2. Introduction • Point-to-point MIMO: Discussed in previous chapters • Single transmitter single receiver • Multiple antennas at single location (with sufficient spacing) • Also known as single user MIMO • Multiuser MIMO • Single/Multiple transmitters and single/multiple receivers with single/multiple antennas at one/both the transmitter and receiver • May be regarded as virtual MIMO • Multiple antennas distributed across locations

  3. Some issues with point-to-point MIMO • No multiplexing gain for rank deficit channels • Line-of-sight propagation • Keyhole channel • Full potential of MIMO can not be utilized • Multiple RF chains • Bulky hardware • TAS simplifies the hardware • But at the cost of feedback from receiver to transmitter

  4. Some issues with point-to-point MIMO • Size and inter antenna spacing • Base station: no constraint • Mobile station: limited size – large number of antennas not possible • mmWave frequencies may be a solution • Channel estimation overhead • Large MIMO systems: 100s of antennas at each terminal • Large size of pilot signals • Multi-user MIMO : A Solution?

  5. Multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO) • Overcomes shortcomings of point-to-point MIMO • Single base station with several antennas • Multiple users with single antennas • Let Base station has M antennas • Usually M is greater than or equal to total number of users/user antennas • K number of users with single antennas • Users may have multiple antennas too • Single antenna user is a simplified model

  6. MU-MIMO MU-MIMO system with transmitter employing M=4 antennas serving K=4 users with single antenna (highly simplified model)

  7. Multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO) • Two types of Communication in this scenario • Downlink (DL): communication from base station to mobile user • Uplink (UL): Communication from mobile user to base station

  8. Multiuser MIMO uplink • Multiple access for K mobile users • K users transmit signal to base station • Each user may have single or multiple antenna • Single antenna: one symbol per transmission • Multiple antenna: Symbol vector per transmission

  9. Multiuser MIMO uplink • Let signal transmitted by ith user is • For general representation transmitted signal is shown as vector of symbols for multiple antenna • Channel matrix for each user can be given as

  10. Multiuser MIMO uplink MU-MIMO system with transmitter employing M antennas serving K users with single antenna (uplink)

  11. Multiuser MIMO uplink • The signal received at the BS can be given as • Where the channel matrix is combined channel matrix for all the users, given as • Symbol vector is given as

  12. Multiuser MIMO uplink • is the AWGN with zero mean and diagonal covariance matrix. • Note: uplink transmission is like spatial multiplexing But from different locations • Multiple users regarded as single transmitter with multiple antennas • Challenge: synchronization of transmission from multiple users

  13. Multiuser MIMO downlink • Communication from BS to mobile users • Channel is considered as broadcast channel • BS broadcast user data at using same time frequency resources • Usually, uplink and downlink transmissions are done using time division duplexing (TDD)

  14. Multiuser MIMO downlink MU-MIMO system with transmitter employing M antennas serving K users with single antenna (downlink)

  15. Multiuser MIMO downlink • It is assumed that the channel state information is available only with the BS • Users do not have CSI • BS uses the reciprocity property of the channel • Precoding is done while transmission • Detection without requiring CSI at the mobile user

  16. Multiuser MIMO downlink • The signal received at the mobile terminal can be given as • Where the channel matrix, used for precoding, is combined channel matrix for all the users, given as • Received signal vector containing K users’ data is given as

  17. Massive MIMO • Several antennas at the BS • Few antennas at the mobile user (usually one or two) • A special case of MU-MIMO • Assume, number of antennas at BS tends to infinity • Total of user antennas is much less than the No. of antennas available at the base station

  18. Massive MIMO • Mobile station small number of antennas (one or two) • Most signal processing at base station • Small mobile device • No/less receive diversity • Interference management by base station • Beamforming in downlink – reduction in interference and energy requirements • Uplink – separation of user signals at the base station through signal processing • TDD massive MIMO • Scalable system in terms of number of antennas • Channel estimation time is independent of the number of BS antennas

  19. Massive MIMO MU-MIMO system for a single base station employing M=14 antennas serving K=3 users with single antenna (downlink transmission)

  20. Massive MIMO • High spectral efficiency and diversity order*: Simultaneous transmission/reception from many antennas • Better energy efficiency*: uplink transmission power inversely varying with the number of base station antennas • * As compared to the base station with single antenna

  21. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • Consider M antenna BS serving K single antenna users • Channel coefficient between ith user to jth BS antenna • is small scale fading coefficient and • is large scale fading coefficient

  22. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • The uplink channel matrix can be given as • with the matrices represented as

  23. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • When the channels are independent/orthogonal • Also, known as channel favorable condition • For , favorable condition is satisfied • In different channel conditions • For different antenna array configurations

  24. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • Channel favorable conditions: • Irrespective of fading distribution • Classical/generalized fading channels • Vast spatial diversity small scale randomness dies

  25. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • Let, equal transmission power for uplink to each user • Uplink capacity can be evaluated as • Further, it can be simplified as

  26. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • Capacity: Sum of individual user capacity • Decoupled signals are obtained through matched filtering • Matched filter is simple linear processing as follows

  27. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • Further, use the substitutions • Decoupled signals are obtained as • being the diagonal matrix, signals are decoupled

  28. Massive MIMO: uplink capacity • After matched filtering • Signal decoupling is obtained, i. e. • K parallel independent Gaussian channels • Each user SNR is obtained as • Total Capacity is sum of channel capacity of each user

  29. Massive MIMO: downlink capacity • BS has CSI. So, Adaptive power allocation is possible • Let, power allocation matrix is • with sum of all user power as constant for each transmission, i.e.

  30. Massive MIMO: downlink capacity • The channel capacity can be given as • Base station knowing CSI, uses precoding as

  31. Massive MIMO: downlink capacity • The downlink received signal can be given as • For favorable channel conditions • Again, signal decoupling is obtained in the downlink too.

  32. Massive MIMO: downlink capacity • Linear precoding is used at BS to obtain enhanced capacity through adaptive power allocation • Some assumptions for capacity analysis are: • Orthogonal channles • Perfect CSI at the BS • Reciprocal channel

  33. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • CSI is estimated only at the BS • Assume reciprocal channels • No CSI is required at the mobile user • Capacity analysis: presented for single cell • Practical: many cells near by (Figure in next slide) • Interference to/from near-by cells

  34. Massive MIMO: Multicell network Multi-cell MIMO based cellular network (BS equipped with M=14 antennas and single antenna MS or user, each cell has K=2 users for illustration purpose)

  35. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • Pilot transmission from users • Orthogonal pilots from every user • Limited number of orthogonal pilots • Pilots may be reused in other cells for multicell networks • This causes interference of pilot signals • Received signal: linear combination of pilots from home cell and neighbour cell

  36. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • Pilot signal power: proportional to distance of user from the BS • Cell edge user transmits more power • This results in interference to the neighbouring cell while CSI estimation known as pilot contamination

  37. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • Due to pilot contamination, matched filter precoding fails for downlink transmission • Other precoding techniques are useful, like • Zero forcing (ZF) • Regularized zero forcing (RZF) • Minimum mean square error (MMSE)

  38. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • Multiplier for downlink precoding can be given by • where with as the estimated CSI at lth base station, and

  39. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • The above precoding multiplier is a general case for RZF. • Some of the special cases of RZF are: • for MF • for ZF • for MMSE

  40. Massive MIMO: downlink precoding • Base station cooperation : to combat pilot contamination, also known as coordinated multipoint transmission (CoMP) • Two types : Full or Partial cooperation • Full cooperation: Network MIMO • Partial cooperation: coordinated beamforming/scheduling

  41. Massive MIMO: Challenges • Loss of reciprocity in uplink and downlink channels • Limited number of orthogonal pilots: pilot reuse leading to pilot contamination • High interference at the cell edge • No CSI at base station prior to link establishment • Transmit beamforming not possible • STBC may be used • Favourable channel condition may not satisfy all the time leading to performance degradation

  42. Massive MIMO: outage probability • Outage probability: a metric of system performance • Consider downlink transmission for user outage probability • Suppose BS use MF precoding and each user has single antenna • Transmitted signal at BS can be represented as

  43. Massive MIMO: outage probability • Received signal at the ith user is • Received signal comprises of three components • intended signal (first term), • interference (second term), i.e. signal for other users • Noise () – let it be zero mean unit variance

  44. Massive MIMO: outage probability • The signal to interference plus noise ratio in this can be given by • where is the power per user (equal power allocation),

  45. Massive MIMO: outage probability • In general, and may be assumed to be coming from any distribution depending on the scenario • Consider they are Gamma distributed for this analysis • The PDF of can be given as • So,

  46. Massive MIMO: outage probability • The PDF of can be given as • where ,

  47. Massive MIMO: outage probability • The PDF of can be simplified as • where,

  48. Massive MIMO: outage probability • On simplification the above expression reduces to • It can be evaluated as

  49. Massive MIMO: outage probability • The outage probability can be given as • So, the approximate outage probability can be given as • where and

  50. mmWave Massive MIMO • To be implemented at mmWave frequency region • Shorter wavelength – smaller antenna size – allows large number of antennas at single terminal • One of the technology candidate for 5G communication

More Related