1 / 19

Supplementary Plenary Information - January 2010

Supplementary Plenary Information - January 2010. Authors:. Date: 2010-1-16. Name. Company. Address. Phone. email. 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054. +1 (321) 427-4098. bkraemer@. marvell. .com. Bruce Kraemer. Marvell.

rpeak
Download Presentation

Supplementary Plenary Information - January 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supplementary Plenary Information - January 2010 Authors: Date: 2010-1-16 Name Company Address Phone email 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 +1 (321)427-4098 bkraemer@ marvell .com Bruce Kraemer Marvell Abstract: Information on topics for WG11 Interim meetings – January 2010 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  2. Monday Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  3. Monday Agenda 4.1.3 - WG18 AgendaJanuary Meeting Room – Palisades (California Level) Monday 10:30 – 6:00 pm Tuesday 8:00 – 6:00 pm Wednesday 8:00 – 6:00 pm Thursday 8:00 – 6:00 pm Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  4. Monday Agenda 4.1.4 WG19 • Meeting Room: Encino (California Level) • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.19/dcn/09/19-09-0100-00-0000-january-2010-agenda.xls • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.19/dcn/10/19-10-0002-00-0000-january-2010-opening-report.ppt Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  5. Working Group 19 Organization Coexistence Assurance Standing Committee SC Chair 802.19 WG WG Chair WG Vice Chair WG Secretary Task Group 1 TVWS Coexistence TG Chair TG Vice Chair TG Secretary January 2010 Monday Agenda Item 4.1.4 Slide 5 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  6. WG 19 Objectives for the Week • Develop a process document laying out the stages of standard development • Requirements • Evaluation criteria • Steps for contributions, evaluations, voting, etc. • General technical discussions on possible architectures • Joint meeting with 802.11 and 802.22 • Develop a call for submissions to be sent out after the session in preparation for future sessions • Nomination for TG1 and SC officers • Schedule Conference Calls • Plan for March session January 2010 Monday Agenda Item 4.1.4 Slide 6 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  7. January 2010 Slide 7 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  8. Monday Agenda 4.1.5 - WG22 AgendaJanuary Meeting Room – Westwood(+ Malibu for breakouts) (California Level) Monday 10:30 – 6:00 pm Tuesday 8:00 – 6:00 pm Wednesday 8:00 – 6:00 pm Thursday 8:00 – 6:00 pm Friday 8:00 – 12:00 pm closing plenary https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/10/22-10-0009-01-0000-ieee-802-22-wg-agenda-january-2010-los-angeles.xls Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  9. Monday Agenda Item 4.1.6 Emergency Services SG • At the July Plenary the 802.21 Emergency Services Study Group PAR that had been distributed to the rest of 802 for approval consideration was withdrawn. The Study Group itself was changed from a 802.21 Study Group to an Executive Committee Study Group. Geoff Thompson was appointed by the chair of 802 to be the chair of the new Emergency Services Executive Committee Study Group (ES-ECSG). • This week meetings will be held in : • Tuesday am2 @ Senators 1 (South Mezzanine) • Tuesday pm1 @ Directors 2 (South Mezzanine) • Stephen McCann is WG11 focal point Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  10. Monday Agenda 4.1.7 WG19/ WG22/WG11 • Joint meeting Monday 7:30 pm – 9:30 pm • Meeting Room: Olympic Ballroom (Plaza Level) WG19 topics • Establishing Liaisons between WGs • Scheduling of joint meetings and calls to enable broad participation in 802.19.1 project • Overview of the 802.19 plan for the week • WG11 topics • How 802.11 plans to run the Task Group af. • How does 802.19 plan to get universal acceptance of their coexistence mechanisms? • If universal adoption is not possible, how does 802.19 plan to keep the use of these mechanisms from disadvantaging those who do use them Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  11. Monday Agenda Item 4.1.7 EPA Energy Star Tuesday pm2 Constellation 2 room – Plaza Level Update on Small Network Equipment test plan for Energy STAR Open Forum for discussing in depth what WG11 should do (if anything) to service requirements for EPA Energy STAR Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  12. Monday Agenda Item 4.1.7 Smart Grid • Tuesday pm2 • Senators 1 room – South Mezzanine Level • Thursday am1 • Constellation 2 room – Plaza Level Open Forum for discussing in depth what WG11 should do (if anything) to service requirements for NIST Smart Grid Update of activities in P2030 Open SG NIST PAP#2 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  13. Monday Agenda Item 4.1.8 EC or Standards Board Activities WG19 approved to become WG rather than TAG QosMAn PAR Approved by NesCom – TG ae created TV Whitespace PAR Approved by NesCom – TG af created Chair elections/confirmation during Wednesday plenary Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  14. Wednesday Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  15. Registration Change Proposal • Colleagues, • After some careful study of our current Registration Process, we have noted some significant changes in how people register for Plenary Sessions, and it is now causing some serious difficulties in our preparation for upcoming sessions: • 1) Nearly all of our attendees are now waiting until just before the Pre-Registration deadline to register for the upcoming session, so we have extreme difficulty estimating attendance prior to that cut-off date. • 2) Most attendees are not booking their hotel rooms in advance of the cut-off either and so we are having major concerns from our hotels, who see <<100 rooms booked until just prior to the cutoff date. In these difficult economic times, when many Groups tend to miss their numbers by large margins, this causes an undue amount of paranoia from the hotel’s revenue manager, and we tend to get a serious curtailment of our usual goodwill and support as a result. • 3) In these difficult economic times it is very much harder to allow significant numbers of attendees to postpone registration until they arrive on-site because it causes overload of our on-site registration staff and puts a huge uncertainty in our actual attendance projections. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  16. Registration Change Proposal • Therefore we are proposing to implement some modifications that will be necessary to maintain our good reputation and attendance predictions going forward: • 1) We will advance the registration cut-off date by 2-weeks, from 17 days prior to the meeting to 31 days prior to the meeting. • 2) We will advance the hotel room-block cut-off by the same amount so that they continue to occur on the same date. • 3) We will adjust the Session Registration Fees to the following formula as has been done in many of the WG interim sessions: • Web Pre-Registration Fee (prior to 31-day cut-off) will remain at $400. • Web Registration Fee (after the Pre-Registration cut-off but at least 7-days before start of session (Monday) will now be $500. • Web or On-site Registration less than 7-days before or during the session will now be $600. • 4) We will also consider adding some form of surcharge to the registration fee for those attendees not staying in the 802-contracted hotel. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  17. Registration Change Proposal • We hope this will encourage our attendees to give us more advance warning of their intentions and we will continue to allow fairly generous cancellation provisions unless we see a significant change in the numbers attempting to cancel during the last 31-days before the session. • These provisions will need to be made even more stringent when we begin our adventure with non-North-American Plenary venues (e.g. Singapore and Macao) since lead-times and advance warnings are much more critical to our financial well-being in those types of venues, where the penalties are much more toxic. We do not wish to discourage future attendees, but rather to provide some reasonable economic incentives to give us better advance notice of their intentions. We hope our WGs will encourage their memberships to cooperate with these changes so we can continue to offer some best value arrangement with future venues by reducing the chance that bad projections will cause a serious shortfall to blemish our otherwise excellent record for consistently making our numbers. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  18. Friday Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

  19. Friday Agenda Item 2.09 IEEE Shop Contents 16 January 2010 http://www.ieee.org/web/standards/home/index.html Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

More Related