1 / 23

2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review

2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review. In situ Causticizing for Black Liquor Gasifiers Scott Sinquefield, IPST Xiaoyan Zeng, IPST Alan Ball, IPST James Cantrell, Jacobs Engineering Thermochemical Platform November 15, 2005. Project start: Oct 1, 2002 Project end: Oct 31, 2006 70% complete.

roy
Download Presentation

2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review In situ Causticizing for Black Liquor Gasifiers Scott Sinquefield, IPST Xiaoyan Zeng, IPST Alan Ball, IPST James Cantrell, Jacobs Engineering Thermochemical Platform November 15, 2005

  2. Project start: Oct 1, 2002 Project end: Oct 31, 2006 70% complete Process Integration Validate integrated black liquor gasification and causticiziation processes. Overview Barriers Timeline Detailed Investigation Budget Partners • $600,000 • DOE $480,000 • IPST/Jacobs $120,000 • Funding in FY04: $137,402 • Funding for FY05: $165,605 • Requested FY06: $176,978 • Institute of Paper Science at GA Tech • Jacobs Engineering

  3. Impetus Both of the current, actively marketed, black liquor gasification technologies results in an increased causticizing load which must be addressed Entrained-flow gasifier 950C, O2- or air-blown, ~5 sec residence time Steam reformer ~600C, fluidized bed ~50 hrs residence time

  4. Project Goals and Objectives • Phase 1: Direct- and auto-causticization processes (i.e. borates, titanates, and manganates) have been demonstrated effective on pure Na2CO3 in the laboratory. We test the processes on black liquor at realistic gasification conditions and determine which chemistries hold promise. Both equilibrium modeling and experimentation are employed. Successful processes move on to phase 2. (IPST) Go/No go • Phase 2: For the successful causticizing chemistries we confirm that concentrated caustic can be recovered, suitable for a pulping liquor (i.e. white liquor). We also identify feasible ways of purging non-process elements (“dregs”). (IPST) Go/No go • Phase 3: For the methods passing Phase 2 (if any), we determine the most rational ways of integrating them into the mill and perform economic evaluations. (Jacobs + IPST)

  5. Project Strategic Fit Black liquor gasification (BLG) promises significant market incentives such as combined cycle power generation, syn-gas to chemicals, and high-yield pulping synergies. However, pulping chemicals must still be recovered, and the inherent increase in causticizing load must be addressed: • Partial in situ causticizing would offset the load increase for a full scale gasifier utilizing the existing lime cycle; while complete causticizing would eliminate the petroleum-intensive lime cycle: • A 1000 ton/day pulp mill uses 90,000 bbls/yr #6 fuel oil to fire the kiln. (=$3.78 Million/yr at current prices) • Total US kraft pulp production is 156,700 ton/day. 100% adoption = 14 Million bbls/yr fuel oil saved. (=$650 Million/yr in fuel saved) • BLG for incremental capacity on a boiler-limited mill will require equivalent incremental causticizing capacity. • Pilot demonstration is easy with either a gasifier or a recovery boiler • IPST membership includes P&P companies committed to BLG

  6. Project Approach Chemistry for the titanate case; others are analogous Sodium is bound up by titanates within the gasifier: Na2CO3+3 TiO2(s)  Na2O.3TiO2(s)+CO2 (g) 7Na2CO3+5(Na2O.3TiO2)(s)  3(4Na2O.5TiO2)(s)+7CO2(g) Na2O6TiO2(s)+Na2CO3(s) 2(Na2O3TiO2)(s)+CO2(g) [Abbreviated NT3, N4T5, NT6] The caustic is later recovered by hydrolysis: 3(4Na2O.5TiO2)(s)+7H2O  14NaOH(aq) + 5(Na2O.3TiO2)(s) 2(Na2O3TiO2) (s)+H2O  2NaOH (aq)+Na2O6TiO2 (s)

  7. Project Approach cont. Phase 1 We begin by gasifying mixtures of black liquor and the causticizing agents (titanate, borate and manganate) at industrially realistic gasification conditions (i.e. entrained flow at 950C, and steam reforming at 600C) and determine which chemistries work. We also employ equilibrium modeling with FactSage 5.1 for comparison. Causticizing conversion is determined by the carbonate content remaining in the char (solid) phase compared to char from un-doped liquor. IPST’s Pressurized Entrained Flow Reactor (PEFR) was built for gasification research in a variety of gas environments at pressures to 30 bar, temperatures to 1500C, and residence times to 8 seconds.

  8. Project Approach cont. Raw Syn Gas Air, O2, steam Gasifier Char Raw White Liquor White liquor for pulping Dregs Purge(?) Black liquor Leaching Mixing Leached solids Cleaned Titanate or Manganate Dregs Purge(?) Phase 2 The gasified char is hydrolyzed to recover the caustic. The leachate solution is analyzed by ICP for metal species, and titrated to verify the amount of hydroxide. The leached solids are characterized by SEM-EDS, XRD, ICP, and BET to close the material balance and narrow the dregs removal options between chemical and physical processes; then test.

  9. Project Approach cont. Phase 3 The final phase includes mill integration and economic evaluations by Jacobs Engineering

  10. Project Approach cont. Phase 3 Economic evaluation

  11. Project Tasks • Phase 1: We must first demonstrate a high degree of causticizing conversion for each of the chemistries. 85% causticizing efficiency is common for the current lime cycle technology. If not, we abandon the option (Go/No go) • Phase 2: We must then confirm that we can hydrolyze the char and get hydroxide back. The causticizing agent must be in its starting form to be used again. If not, we abandon the option (Go/No go). Also the dregs must be removable from the cycle or they will accumulate. • Phase 3: For any processes that remain, they must be such that they can be integrated to the mill and they must be economical or they have little value to the industry. Jacobs Engineering assumes the lead in this phase.

  12. Project Collaboration Collaboration and Tech Transfer • Coordinate with BLG vendors/users to include in situ causticizng in pilot trials and incremental capacity applications • Publish results in open literature • Jacob’s can utilize the design data on its gasification projects. • Revisit overall BLG (Low Temp and High Temp) economics for kraft mill applications incorporating results of viable in situ causticizing. Should help with justification for incremental units as well as replacement systems. • Apply results to conventional recovery boilers for mills with bottlenecked lime kilns. [Note that borates have application in Tomlinson-based recovery systems as well] • On-going exchange of results with Adrian van Heiningen (U. of Maine) who leads a project focusing on titanates and high-yield pulping for low temperature steam reforming.

  13. Market & Customers • Potential customers are pulp producers, bio-refineries, and electric utilities with the intent of building, owning, and operating a gasification-based recovery island with combined cycle power generation while processing pulping liquors for an adjacent pulp mill. • Threshold for adoption is IRR=25% (Larson, et.al. ‘A Cost Benefit Assessment of Black Liquor Gasification’, 2003). Larson found the IRR to be 20%, but without considering in situ causticizing, environmental benefits, energy credits, or external social benefits.

  14. Competitive Advantage • In situ causticizing processes provide an additional economic incentive for adoption of black liquor gasification, and therefore have the same window of opportunity; that being that the technology must be ready for deployment as aging recovery boilers are replaced or undergo major rebuilds. • Competing technologies are state-of-the-art Tomlinson recovery boilers and the supposed “high efficiency recovery boiler”. While compatible with conventional pulp mills, they do not integrate well with multi-product biorefineries. Gasification offers greater flexibility over a wide range of process/product variations. • Market effects would include reduced demand for #6 fuel and lime, and increased use of TiO2, and/or NaBO2, and/or Mn3O4 • With regard to economics, the savings in offset fossil fuel (#6 fuel oil) alone justifies the use of in situ causticizing.

  15. Project Stage In situ causticization processes have been proven in the lab to convert Na2CO3 to NaOH. In this work we test them with black liquor at realistic gasifier conditions, investigate non-process element removal, and perform economic and mill integration evaluations. Are the processes truly viable?

  16. Progress and Accomplishments Results show that titanate direct causticizing will work for high temperature black liquor gasification at low to moderate pressures, but not at 20 bars (unless the CO2 can somehow be maintained at a lower level)

  17. Progress and Accomplishments Titanate direct causticizing was not effective for the steam reforming case at 600C. However, modeling suggests that it would work at 650C and above.

  18. Progress and Accomplishments Borates added for 20% conversion will be effective for atmospheric pressure entrained flow gasification (such as the Chemrec booster at New Bern)

  19. Progress and Accomplishments Borates added for 20% conversion did not prove to be effective for the 600C steam reforming case. Modeling suggests that 925C would be required.

  20. Progress and Accomplishments Manganates proved to be 100% effective for steam reforming at 600C, but at 950C (not shown) they showed zero conversion

  21. Progress and Accomplishments Phase 2. Summary of non-process element removal results • Concentrated caustic (white liquor) can be made but will require staged leaching of titanate char • Leaching of manganate chars consistently yielded 40% of expected hydroxide. We are working to resolve the discrepancy. • Hydration of borate chars produced high caustic recovery • ICP analysis of char, leachate, and leached solids produced good material balance closure. • Most of the B, Cr, Si, and V split to the leachate phase • The remaining non-process elements favor the solid phase. SEM-EDS will determine the number of phases

  22. Progress and Accomplishments Phase 2. Non-process element removal options • Viable techniques depend on fate of NPE’s (i.e. dissolved versus solid phase and number of solid phases) • Ion exchange • Mg(OH)2 complexing • Acid titration • Laminar air classification (size/density difference) • Density-based separation for slurries • APIC jig air pulses produce bed with density gradient • Knelson/Falcon concentrators centrifugal

  23. Future Work • Further characterize the leached solids to determine how non-process elements are distributed with respect to phases. This will narrow the removal options to test • Resolve the hydroxide material balance for the manganate case. If hydroxide cannot be balanced with carbonate, then must abandon this option. • Test the chemical processes for non-process element removal in the lab. • Test borates at 100% conversion for HTBLG. • Mill integration study, including: design basis, material & energy balances, process scope descriptions, flow diagrams, major equipment, +/-25% capital estimate. • Economic evaluation.

More Related