1 / 16

Virginia Ryan White Part B Data Report July 2007 to June 2008

Virginia Ryan White Part B Data Report July 2007 to June 2008. Kim Hunter and Anne Giuranna Rhodes Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory Virginia Commonwealth University * Note: includes all data received at SERL as of 7/15/2008. Data Reports – Quality Check Areas Regional Tables.

roxy
Download Presentation

Virginia Ryan White Part B Data Report July 2007 to June 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Virginia Ryan White Part B Data ReportJuly 2007 to June 2008 Kim Hunter and Anne Giuranna Rhodes Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory Virginia Commonwealth University * Note: includes all data received at SERL as of 7/15/2008

  2. Data Reports – Quality Check AreasRegional Tables • Table 1 – are client totals what are expected for the first quarter of the RW year? • Table 1 – are there specific demographics with high levels of unknowns? • Table 2 and 3 – are there numbers reported in service areas in which Part B funding is not being provided for the 2008-2009 grant year? • Table 4 – is each subcontractor reporting a total number of clients that is congruent with what they are billing for?

  3. Data Reports – Quality Check AreasMultiple Provider Report • Are clients accessing appropriate services at each subcontractor site? • If clients are accessing similar services, do the dates of service overlap or are they exclusive? • Is the number of service units being accessed by individual clients appropriate? • Is there coordination among subcontractor sites who serve the same client?

  4. Summary :July 2007 to June 2008 • Total of 2985 clients served (3083) • 21.2% of population received first consortia service (19.6%) • 31.6% of population below Federal Poverty Level(30.5%) • 15.1% of clients received non-ADAP pharmaceutical services (22.8%) • 37.1% of Consortia clients received ADAP (42.5%) * Numbers in parentheses are from one year ago (July 2006 to June 2007)

  5. Part B Statewide Summary:Clients Served by Region and Ryan White Year

  6. Part B Statewide Summary:Clients Served by Service Area

  7. Part B: New Clients by Region 2003-2008

  8. New Clients by Region:July 2007 to June 2008

  9. New vs. Continuing Clients:July 2007 to June 2008

  10. ADAP and Consortia by RegionJuly 2007 to June 2008

  11. MAI Summary: July 2007 to June 2008 • Served 94 Clients • 12 (13.2%) enrolled in ADAP in same time period • Provided 130 outreach encounters • 80% of MAI clients were new

  12. Part B Core Services by RegionJuly 2007 to June 2008 % of Total Core Services

  13. Part B Services by Region July 2007 to June 2008Consortia and MAI Services Only % of Total Clients

  14. Part B Services by Region July 2007 to June 2008Consortia and ADAP % of Total Clients

More Related