1 / 28

I. FINANCE - Introduction

I. FINANCE - Introduction. Professors Simon Pak and John Zdanowicz. I. FINANCE - WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT?. MAXIMIZING PROFIT ? MAXIMIZING MONEY HOLDINGS ?. MAXIMIZING EXPECTED HAPPINESS => MAXIMIZING EXPECTED UTILITY CONSIDERING TIME AND UNCERTAINTY

Download Presentation

I. FINANCE - Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. I. FINANCE - Introduction Professors Simon Pak and John Zdanowicz

  2. I. FINANCE - WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT? • MAXIMIZING PROFIT ? • MAXIMIZING MONEY HOLDINGS ?. • MAXIMIZING EXPECTED HAPPINESS => MAXIMIZING EXPECTED UTILITY • CONSIDERING TIME AND UNCERTAINTY MAX E(HAPPINESS) = MAX [ E(H0) + E(H1) + E(H2) + . . . + E(Hn) ] WHERE t = 0 . . . n WHAT IS n? t = -1 . . . -n PAST - SUNK COST t = 0 . . . n EXPECTED LIFE t = n+1 . . . INFINITY YOU ARE DEAD - WHO CARES n IS YOUR EXPECTED LIFE

  3. Finance Decisions and Utility • MAX E(H) => MAX E(CONSUMPTION) => MAX E(CONSUMPTION) => MAX WEALTH • WEALTH = Value Of Current Endowment + Value Of Labor Income + Value Of Claims On Assets (Investments In Firms) • FIRM VALUE = f (Investment, Financing, & Dividend Decisions)

  4. II.  EVOLUTION OF FINANCE • 1900 • EMERGED FROM ECONOMICS • INSTRUMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS • NO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS • 1920'S • NEW TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION • FIRMS NEEDED FUNDS • EMPHASIS ON LIQUIDITY • EMPHASIS ON RAISING EXTERNAL FUNDS • 1930'S • DEPRESSION • BANKRUPTCY AND REORGANIZATION • CONSERVATISM ‑ DEBT • GOVT. REGULATION OF THE SECURITY MARKETS • INCREASED FINANCIAL DATA

  5. II.  EVOLUTION OF FINANCE • 1940'S & Early 50’s • TRADITIONAL APPROACH • VIEW OF THE OUTSIDER ‑ INVESTOR OR CREDITOR • SECURITY ANALYSIS • NO EMPHASIS ON FIRM DECISION MAKING • MID 1950’s • VIEW OF THE INSIDER • INVESTMENT DECISIONS • CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS • DIVIDEND POLICY DECISIONS • * VALUATION THEORY • CORPORATE FINANCE <=> SECURITY ANALYSIS

  6. II.  EVOLUTION OF FINANCE • 1960'S • QUANTITATIVE ERA • MBA DEGREE ‑ PHYSICAL SCIENTISTS • COMPUTER • DATA BASES • 1970'S, 1980'S, 1990'S • THEORY ERA • COMMON THEORETICAL BASE • FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

  7. Intuitive Approach To Finance • FINANCE ‑ QUANTITATIVE VS. INTUITIVE • FINANCE IS MATHEMATICAL • DON'T NEED TO MEMORIZE EQUATIONS • NEED TO KNOW HOW TO GET THE CORRECT ANSWER • POOL ‑ PHYSICS: VELOCITY, ANGLES • MINNESOTA FATS • NEVER STUDIED PHYSICS • ACTS AS IF HE KNEW PHYSICS • LEARNED BY TRIAL AND ERROR • YOU CAN’T USE TRIAL & ERROR => BANKRUPTCY

  8. DEVELOPMENT OF FINANCE THEORY • FINANCE = ECONOMICS = SOCIAL SCIENCE • CAN'T EXPERIMENT ON HUMANS • NORMATIVE THEORY VS. POSITIVE THEORY • NORMATIVE - WHAT SHOULD BE . . . DEDUCTIVE LOGIC • POSITIVE - WHAT IS . . . INDUCTIVE LOGIC • POSITIVE IS MORE FUN . . . War Stories . . . Bad Finance • INCOME TAX WITHOLDING • CHRISTMAS CLUB • DEBIT CARDS • STUDENT LOANS • TACO BELL

  9. Methodology To Develop Finance Theory - Physical Science 1. Make Assumptions About Man - Rational And Economic A. Comparability - people can compare and rank choices A (PREFERRED TO) B A (P) B B (PREFERRED TO) A B (P) A A (INDIFFERENT TO ) B A (I) B B. Transitivity - people are logically consistent IF A(P)B AND B(P)C . . . THEREFORE . . . A(P)C OR IF A(I)B AND B(I)C . . . THEREFORE . . . A(I)C

  10. U Decreasing Marginal Utility U Constant Marginal Utility Increasing Marginal Utility U2 U U1 Wealth W1 W W2 Wealth Wealth Assumptions - continued C. NON-SATURATION MORE IS PREFERRED TO LESS TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING IS GREAT MORE WEALTH => MORE CONSUMPTION => MORE HAPPINESS d(U)/d(C)>0 and d(C)/d(W)>0 U D. DIMINISHING MARGINAL UTILITY HAPPINESS INCREASES AT A DECREASING RATE RESULTS IN RISK AVERSION

  11. Scientific Approach To Theory 1. MAKE ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT MAN: Rational And Economic 2. REMOVE REAL WORLD CONSTRAINTS No Taxes, No Transactions Costs, Divisibility Of Securities 3. DEDUCE CONCLUSIONS - BASED ON LOGIC Constant Over Time 4. ADD BACK REAL WORLD CONSTRAINTS 5. EMPLOY THE MODEL MAKES FINANCE MORE LIKE A PHYSICAL SCIENCE ALLOWS REAL WORLD CONSTRAINTS TO CHANGE

  12. Max Happiness - Max Wealth - For Whom? • CONSUMER • EMPLOYEE • CREDITOR • GOVERNMENT • SOCIETY • MANAGEMENT • OWNER => SHAREHOLDER • THE GOLDEN RULE OF FINANCE • THOSE WHO HAVE THE GOLD MAKE THE RULES • MAXIMIZE SHAREHOLDER WEALTH

  13. II. Focus Of Finance ‑ Return On Capital • CAPITALISM ‑ RETURN ON INVESTMENT • WHY DO CAPITALISTS DESERVE A RETURN ON CAPITAL • KARL MARX ARGUED THAT THEY WERE EXPLOITING THE WORKERS • AUSTRIAN ECONOMISTS REFUTED HIS ARGUMENTS

  14. A. Time Value Of Money (Delayed Consumption) • INCOME = CONSUMPTION + SAVINGS (INVESTMENT) • INCOME => FIXED • THEREFORE TO INCREASE INVESTMENT MUST DECREASE CONSUMPTION • INDIVIDUALS PREFER CURRENT CONSUMPTION • THEREFORE DEMAND COMPENSATION FOR DELAYING CONSUMPTION • EXAMPLE: PORSCHE • $ 100,000 DELAY FOR 1 YEAR ‑ NO • BUT PAY $110,000 IN 1 YEAR ‑ YES *** INTEREST RATE CREATED = 10 %

  15. CAPITAL MARKETS • INTEREST RATES SET BY SUPPLY AND DEMAND • INTEREST RATE = COMPENSATION FOR DELAYED CONSUMPTION = PAYMENT FOR CURRENT CONSUMPTION CANNOT BE TOO MUCH BORROWING => AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF LENDING MUST EXIST • CAPITAL MARKETS:  • NEEDED FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • NEED TO TRADE OVER TIME

  16. Capital Market Examples • EXAMPLES:  • MORTGAGE, CREDIT CARD, AUTO LOANS, EDUCATION LOANS, • PENSIONS, SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, LIFE INSURANCE • DIRECT SECURITIES: STOCK, BONDS, PRIVATE MORTGAGE • INDIRECT SECURITIES: PENSION FUND, INSURANCE, MUTUAL FUND, SAVINGS ACCOUNT => FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES i = Pure Interest Rate ‑ Treasury Securities => Time Value

  17. B. RISK PREMIUM • Individuals Demand Compensation For Bearing Risk • RISK PREMIUM = q • GREATER RISK ==> LARGER RISK PREMIUM q • LOWER RISK ==> SMALLER RISK PREMIUM q • NO RISK ==> NO RISK PREMIUM q

  18. Expected Return (Benefit) E(R)* q i i Risk* Risk C. Total Return On Capital (Investment) • ROI = Compensation For Delayed Consumption + Risk Premium • ROI = i + q

  19. Risk vs. Benefit Examples • Examples Of Risk Vs. Benefits *** Natural Event ‑ No Law ** • Investment ‑ T Bills ==> Futures (Illegal) • Job Safety ‑ Clerk Typist ==> Red Adaire (OSHA ?) • Product Warranties ‑ As Is ==> Lifetime (Lemon Law ?) • Auto Insurance ‑ Safe Drivers ==> Bad Drivers (Risk Pool ?) • Consumer Credit ‑ Low Risk ==> High Risk (Usury Laws ?)

  20. Shareholder Wealth Maximization • Alternative Argument To Justify Shareholder Wealth Maximization • Most direct securities owned by financial institutions • The ‘little guy’ invests through financial institutions • ‘Buy a piece of the rock’ • FIRM • A nexus of contracts • The firm is individuals who contract with each other • Business - a fiction • Can’t tax business - can only tax people

  21. D. RISK ANALYSIS • NEW DECISIONS:  • PEOPLE TEND TO FOCUS ON RETURN OR BENEFITS • MUST ALSO LOOK AT RISK ==> DEVIATIONS FROM EXPECTED • WORST CASE <======> BEST CASE & HOW WOULD I FEEL • HISTORICAL ANALYSIS:  • MEASURING PERFORMANCE ‑ YOU AND YOUR BOSS • STATEMENT: I BOUGHT IBM OR I BOUGHT HALOID ! • CORRECT RESPONSE: HOW MUCH RISK DID YOU TAKE ?

  22. EXAMPLE: Risk Analysis • INDIVIDUAL A & B GIVEN $1,000 TO INVEST FOR ONE YEAR • A RETURNS WITH $ 10,000 • B RETURNS WITH $ 00,000 • WHO SHOULD YOU HIRE AND FIRE ? BUT BOTH PLAYED THE SAME GAME:  • PICK A NUMBER FROM 2 TO 12 • BET $1000 • ROLL THE DICE • WINNING NUMBER PAYS $ 10,000

  23. EXAMPLE: Risk Analysis - continuted • A BET ON 12 1/36 X $10,000 = $ 278.00 35/36 X $00,000 = $0,000.00 EXPECTED RETURN = $ 278.00 • B BET ON 7 6/36 X $10,000 = $1,667.00 30/36 X $00,000 = $0,000.00 EXPECTED RETURN = $1,667.00 • DICE ROLLED ===> 12 ROLLED ===> A WINS, B LOSES • NOW, WHO WOULD YOU HIRE & FIRE If you hired A, hire all former lottery winners to manage $

  24. EXAMPLE: Risk Analysis - continuted *** LEARN TO BET ON 7'S *** LIFE IS A CRAP SHOOT *** • RISK SHIFTING: **** LIFE IS RISKY **** • CAN'T ELIMINATE ALL RISK • CAN SHIFT RISK ==> MUST COMPENSATE THOSE WHO ASSUME RISK • INSURANCE, PRODUCT WARRANTIES, ETC. • Eliminating Risk • Proper Diversification • 2 + 2 = 3

  25. Expected Return (Benefit) E(R) A i Risk E. ROLE OF FINANCE • Can't tell you what choice to make • Your choice depends on your attitude toward risk and return * Can Teach You How to Make Rational Choice ! * Can Teach You How to Bet on 7's ! * Can Teach You How to Behave Like Minnesota Fats ! • Simon Pak & John Zdanowicz 2000

  26. F. FINANCE VS. ACCOUNTING • ACCOUNTING ‑ RECORD KEEPING • FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ‑ EXTERNAL ‑ SHAREHOLDERS & CREDITORS • MANAGERIAL (COST) ACCOUNTING ‑ INTERNAL ‑ MANAGEMENT • TAX ACCOUNTING ‑ EXTERNAL ‑ IRS • " REAL ACCOUNTING " ‑ IN THE DESK ‑ THE TRUTH • FINANCE ‑ DECISION MAKING • HOW YOUR DECISIONS IMPACT SHAREHOLDER WEALTH !

  27. G. Overview Of The Firm ‑ Financial Statements • STOCK VS. FLOW Balance Sheet ==> + Income Statement ==> Balance Sheet (1/1/1998) (1/1/1998 TO 12/31/1998) (12/31/1998) • BALANCE SHEET • STOCK • FIRM AT A POINT IN TIME • INCOME STATEMENT • FLOW • WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FIRM OVER TIME • EXAMPLE: FILM OF YOUR TRIP • 1'st Frame ‑ Where You Started ===> 1'st Balance Sheet • Last Frame ‑ Where You Ended ===> Last Balance Sheet • All Other Frames ‑ How You Got There ===> Income Statement

  28. THE FIRM

More Related