1 / 18

Andy Wu (HBS), Discussant Platform Strategy Research Symposium Boston University July 18, 2018

DISCUSSION Dynamics of Platform Competition and Complementor Mobility: Why Do App Developers Move from Apple to Google ? f.k.a . Competing Across Platforms: Antecedents Of Platform Mobility Yongzhi Wang, Nandini Rajagopalan, and Lori Qingyuan Yue. Andy Wu (HBS), Discussant

rossd
Download Presentation

Andy Wu (HBS), Discussant Platform Strategy Research Symposium Boston University July 18, 2018

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DISCUSSIONDynamics of Platform Competition and Complementor Mobility: Why Do App Developers Move from Apple to Google?f.k.a. Competing Across Platforms: Antecedents Of Platform MobilityYongzhi Wang, Nandini Rajagopalan, and Lori Qingyuan Yue Andy Wu (HBS), Discussant Platform Strategy Research Symposium Boston University July 18, 2018

  2. Summary Quality-based vs. quantity-based platform governance strategy for incumbents vs. entrants Theory Phenomenon Complementor (app developers) choice of competing platforms, as revealed by their movement Empirics iOS vs. Android in 2008–2014, focusing on period of Android entry against iOS incumbency Andy Wu (Harvard)

  3. Quality vs. Quantity: Productivity Frontier High Competitive Positioning Choosing a unique point on the frontier. Differentiation Operational Effectiveness Achieving best practice. Low High Low Relative Cost Position Andy Wu (Harvard)

  4. Google/Android is fundamentally a (search) advertising business. Google 2015 Annual Report. Graphics by http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/z9x6bk7 Andy Wu (Harvard)

  5. Apple is fundamentally an iPhone business. Estimated gross profit in FY2014. https://www.statista.com/chart/1994/apples-gross-profit-by-product/ Andy Wu (Harvard)

  6. Overall Trends in Applications and Developers by Platform Source: App Figures. https://blog.appfigures.com/app-stores-growth-accelerates-in-2014/ Andy Wu (Harvard)

  7. Theoretical Strengths • General question of interest to strategy scholars • Platform competition (e.g., Zhu and Iansiti, 2012) • Industry evaluation (e.g., Abrahamson and Rosenkopf, 1993) • Clear theoretical motivation and baseline mechanisms Andy Wu (Harvard)

  8. Theoretical Opportunities • Perspective. Smooth out transition between perspective of the complementor and perspective of platform owner • E.g., when building out hypotheses, the arguments need to be from the perspective of the complementor • Dimensions of quality. Distinguish carefully between vertical differentiation vs. horizontal differentiation. Clarify language, particularly when contextualizing theory in the setting • Rational vs. behavioral arguments. Are behavioral arguments necessary to motivate complementor migration patterns? • E.g. “anxiety” • Judo economics. Price umbrella concept may apply to entrant strategy Andy Wu (Harvard)

  9. Theoretical Opportunities • Specificity of differentiation. Opportunity to delve into transaction-specific vs. generic differentiation • E.g., as iOS apps tend overtime to adopt Android and become saturated with Android, the remaining apps on only iOS are those most tailored specifically for the iOS customer base (as revealed by top-ranked developers moving less to Android, and paid apps moving less to Android when Android is dominant) Andy Wu (Harvard)

  10. Generic Competitive Strategies (Porter, 1980) Andy Wu (Harvard)

  11. Theoretical Opportunities • Switching vs. multi-homing costs. Both are relevant when analyzing dynamics of competition between platform incumbents and entrants. Predictive value skews from multi-homing costs for new market vs. switching costs in established markets Mono-homing: 1 Setup Cost + 1 Ongoing Cost Multi-homing: 2 Setup Costs + 2 Ongoing Cost (may be smaller than 2x mono-home) Switching: 2 Setup Costs + 1 Termination Cost + 1 Ongoing Cost (Eisenmann, 2007) Andy Wu (Harvard)

  12. Empirical Strengths • Huge matching process across platforms, resulting in massive dataset • Excellent job working within constraints of data • Effect sizes • Extensive battery of robustness checks • Media coverage • Surpassing events • Competition on Android • Time confounding effect • Multi-homing costs changing over time • Complementor capabilities Andy Wu (Harvard)

  13. Empirical Opportunities • Omitted variables bias. Anything correlated with both Android-iOS market share gap (benefit-cost to end customer of adopting platform) and complementor transition event from Android to iOS (benefit – cost of developer adopting platform), e.g., general quality of hardware • Ideally would have instrument for Android-iOS market share gap meeting exclusion restriction: something that affects consumer adoption but not developer adoption except through consumer adoption • 1st Stage: • 2nd Stage: • where i: developers, t: time (month), : developer fixed-effects, and are usual error terms • , • is a vector of developers’ characteristics (time-varying). Andy Wu (Harvard)

  14. Empirical Opportunities • Measurement error: free vs. in-app payment. Data limitation, but ideally would have proxy dummy to separate these and strengthen results. One way is to have dummies for apps that are platforms themselves (e.g., social media, dating apps) Andy Wu (Harvard)

  15. Empirical Opportunities • Interaction term vs. inverted U. As in robustness check, proxy average platform profitability (for a complementor) and including interaction term with market share • Switching vs. multi-homing. Separate out multi-homing events (complementor adopts one platform, while staying on original platform) from switching events (complementor adopt one platform, abandons apps on other platform) Andy Wu (Harvard)

  16. Appendix: Minor Details • Footnote superscript number should go after commas and periods,5 not before • X-axis of Android-iOS installed-base gap in smartphone shipment in graphs should be rounded to nearest 10th(i.e., 0.01, 0.02, etc.) • Rescale variable 11 (i.e., Avg. Size of the Developer’s…) by dividing by 1000 or 100,000 • Split summary table and correlation table into two tables or turn the big table horizontal • Variables 8–13 should have more concise variable labels • In tables, show base independent variable before corresponding interaction term(s), e.g., Top-ranked & Portfolio’s % of Paid Apps on iOS Andy Wu (Harvard)

  17. Appendix: Minor Details • Difference-in-difference should be Difference-in-differences • Table 2: (2)(3) The sample includes • Table 2: , and (b) iOS stayers. • Table 3, 4, and 6: Some of the notes should end with period (.) instead of comma (,) • Table 5: Remove hyphen between installed-base and gap • Table 7: Remove extra period after inparentheses. Andy Wu (Harvard)

  18. Thank you!awu@hbs.edu@andywuandywuDisclaimer: Andy Wu is a Android user and developer. Andy Wu (Harvard)

More Related