1 / 14

ULB contribution to the MICROME Jamboree

Evry, June 27, 2011. ULB contribution to the MICROME Jamboree. Tools used for ULB contrib to MICROME. From the Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools (RSAT, http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/rsat/ ). infer-operons : predict operons from genome annotations footprint-discovery

ross-curry
Download Presentation

ULB contribution to the MICROME Jamboree

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evry, June 27, 2011 ULB contribution to the MICROME Jamboree

  2. Tools used for ULB contrib to MICROME • From the Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools (RSAT, http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/rsat/). • infer-operons: predict operons from genome annotations • footprint-discovery • Gene-wise prediction of cis-regulatory elements by detecting conserved motifs in promoters of orthologous genes (phylogenetic footprints). • Inference of a co-regulation network by linking pairs of genes with similar footprints. • Network Analysis Tools (RSAT, http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/neat/). • pathway builder: extract a sub-network of a large metabolic networks (all reactions and compounds) that connects at best a set of seed nodes (e.g. enzymes in the same operon). • compare-classes: comparison between two files describung grouping of elements (e.g. genes) into sets (e.g. operon members), classes (e.g. GO), clusters (e.g. co-expression), etc ... • Pathway projection: comparison between annotated pathways and genome reaction content. • Patwhay comparison: comparison between predicted and annotated pathways.

  3. From operons to pathways

  4. Operon prediction • Example: Bacillus subtilis • http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/MICROME/results/operons/Bacillus_subtilis/Bacillus_subtilis_operons_inferred_dist55_2genes.html • We selected all the predicted operons containing at least 2 genes (single-gene transcription units are not reported).

  5. Examples of 1-to-1 operon/pathway correspondances

  6. Exercise: filling the gap • An operon from B.subtilis contains 4 enzyme-coding genes. • Those enzymes catalyze inter-connected reactions. • The pathway builder inferred 2 possible candidates as intermediates. • Can we use annotations to check the gap filling ?

  7. Predicting pathways from operons

  8. Case study: purine operon(s) • The pur operon was splitted in 3 pieces by infer-operons, because some genes pairs have a larger spacing.

  9. Pathway projections

  10. All METACYC pathways against genome-wise reaction sets • Results • http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/MICROME/results/pathway_projections/projection_against_metacyc/result_index.html • Tool: compare-classes • Approach: compare the set of all “possible” reactions in a given organism (enzyme-coding gene found in genome or spontaneous reaction) with all pathways annotated in Metacyc. • Stats: coverage + hypergeometric significance • Detailed output: lists of reactions found and missing for each pathway. • Example: Bacillus subtilis

  11. Pathway projection profiles (D4.4) • Each row represents one pathway • Each column represents one organism • Separate sheets are generated to show the absolute and relative coverage, significance, ...

  12. Pathway projection tree (D4.4) • The projections profiles can be mapped onto a taxonomic tree, using the tool GeneTrace (Victor Kunin and Christos Ouzounis). • Each intermediate node is annotated with the number of pathways found (green). • Each branch is annotated with the number of lost pathways (blue) or gained pathways (red).

  13. Prediction of co-regulated genes

  14. Detection of conserved motifs in promoters of orthologs • Example of footprint-discovery result • http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/MICROME/results/footprints/Enterobacteriales/Escherichia_coli_K12/NP_416992.1/NP_416992.1_Escherichia_coli_K12_Enterobacteriales_ortho_dyads_3nt_sp0-20-2str-noov_taxfreq_sig0.png

More Related