1 / 28

Chaparral Physics Research

Chaparral Physics Research. Jay Helmericks, Duncan Marriott, John Olson Wilson Infrasound Observatories Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Presented at the Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda 3 Nov 2008

ronnie
Download Presentation

Chaparral Physics Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chaparral Physics Research Jay Helmericks, Duncan Marriott, John Olson Wilson Infrasound Observatories Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks Presented at the Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda 3 Nov 2008 This presentation does not necessarily reflect the policies or views of the United States Government.

  2. Abstract This talk will cover two areas of research that Chaparral Physics has been pursuing, both of which are of interest to the general Infrasound community. The first is an investigation of the linearity of Chaparral Physics sensors. The testing shows that there are three regions: with small-amplitude signals the sensor is fully linear; then, as the signal amplitude increases, there is a point where the linearity of the sensor depends on the shape of the incoming wave; and finally, as the signal exceeds 150 Pa peak-to-peak the sensor response completely departs from linearity. The second area of research looks at both the effectiveness and frequency response of wind noise reduction systems, from ~5 Hz to 100Hz. The effectiveness of wind noise reduction systems have been studied extensively, but little work has been done on the frequency response of such the systems. Preliminary results from this research will be presented. CP Research • ITW 2008

  3. Introduction • Linearity of Chaparral Physics sensors • Frequency response of soaker hose • Large area vs small area wind noise reduction systems • New Chaparral Physics sensors CP Research • ITW 2008

  4. Linearity Setup • Constructed a test chamber with heavy plywood with a subwoofer as the signal source • Standard audio power amplifier and sound card to drive the speaker • Pressure reference was a G.R.A.S 40BF ¼” microphone • Able to test from 1 to ~ 200Hz, and 0.5 Pa p-p to 700 Pa p-p CP Research • ITW 2008

  5. Test Chamber CP Research • ITW 2008

  6. Test chamber opened CP Research • ITW 2008

  7. Single Tone Test • Drove the chamber with a sine wave of varying frequency and amplitudes • Compared the output of the G.R.A.S. microphone to the Chaparral microphones CP Research • ITW 2008

  8. CP Research • ITW 2008

  9. 100 Pa Fit CP Research • ITW 2008

  10. 20 Pa Fit CP Research • ITW 2008

  11. CP Research • ITW 2008

  12. Linearity to 650 Pa p-p CP Research • ITW 2008

  13. CP Research • ITW 2008

  14. Two Tone Test • Used the same test setup • Ran two sine tones at the same time • A low frequency tone is varied in amplitude • A high frequency tone is constant through the tests • Looked at the amplitude of the high frequency tone as the low frequency tone moves the diaphragm through its operating range CP Research • ITW 2008

  15. CP Research • ITW 2008

  16. CP Research • ITW 2008

  17. CP Research • ITW 2008

  18. Linearity Summary • Below 20Pa p-p non-linearity is not significant • From 20-150 Pa p-p small scale non-linearity needs to be considered • Above 150 Pa the wave shape will have significant distortion CP Research • ITW 2008

  19. Response of Wind Noise Filters • Measured the frequency response and the noise reduction • 4 50ft soaker hoses • 2 3ft soaker hoses • Foam doughnut • Used the same signal source as the linearity tests CP Research • ITW 2008

  20. CP Research • ITW 2008

  21. CP Research • ITW 2008

  22. CP Research • ITW 2008

  23. Freq Response CP Research • ITW 2008

  24. Wind Noise Reduction CP Research • ITW 2008

  25. Wind Filter Summary • Short soaker hoses provide no noise reduction and significantly attenuate high frequency signals • Long soaker hoses provided good noise reduction with a slight attenuation of high frequency signals • There appears to be no wind noise reduction relative to an open sensor with a filter that does not have significant averaging area CP Research • ITW 2008

  26. New Sensors • Added a single port configuration back to the lineup • Lighter weight • Provides an option when a manifold is not needed • New feature reduced low cost sensor for 30% less then a M25 • Removed gain selection and sensor self-check functions • See website for details (soon) • www.chaparral.gi.alaska.edu CP Research • ITW 2008

  27. Conclusion • Linearity of Chaparral Physic sensors • 20 Pa p-p transition point to needing to evaluate whether the linearity will effect your results • Wind Noise Filters • Showed the frequency response of soaker hose and how it changes with length • The small filters tested had no noise reduction advantage over an open microphone • New Models from Chaparral Physics CP Research • ITW 2008

  28. Questions?

More Related