EU TRANSPORT POLICY - NEW DEVELOPMENTS

1. EU TRANSPORT POLICY - NEW DEVELOPMENTS Tamás Fleischer Institute for World Economicsof the Hungarian Academy of Sciences http://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch <tfleisch@vki.hu> Working Group „EU-Relations” Alps Adriatic Working Community12th Meeting, Pécs, Europe House 28th April, 2005

2. Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state

3. Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015

4. Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state 1990 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 2004

5. Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state 1990 „Time to decide” 2001 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 2004

6. 1990 „White Paper” 1992 „Time to decide” 2001 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 2004

7. 1990 „White Paper” 1992 Hungarian Transport Policy 1996 „Time to decide” 2001 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 2004

8. 1990 „White Paper” 1992 Trans-European Networks Hungarian Transport Policy 1996 „Time to decide” 2001 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 2004

9. 1990 „White Paper” 1992 Trans-European Networks Hungarian Transport Policy 1996 Pan-European Corridors, TINA „Time to decide” 2001 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 2004

10. 1990 „White Paper” 1992 Trans-European Networks Hungarian Transport Policy 1996 Pan-European Corridors, TINA „Time to decide” 2001 Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015 A TEN revision 2004 (29 April) 2004

11. Common Transport Policy (CTP) of the European Union 1992 • Before 1992 • There was no integrated transport policy in the union, single sectorial targets main motivation was the regulation of the competition • EU CTP 1992 „Single network to the single market” • Integrated transport policy – but focus on one single layer (international level) • Inter-modality, interoperability =>, free access, corridors, TEN-T, single market • Comparing the characteristics of western and eastern European transport transport performance / unite of GDP, accidents, modal split (rail/road ratio) EU-25év CEE+15 év

12. Common Transport Policy (CTP) of the European Union 1992 Illustration of the necessity of interoperability: differences in voltage and electricity systemsof railways of Europe

13. TEN and its extension to the east Source: Az országos közúthálózat 1991-2000 évekre szóló-fejlesztési programja 1991, KHVM. The birth of corridor thinking, renumbering the roads in 1975

14. TEN and its extension to the east • What does the eastern extension of the TEN means ?

15. TEN and its extension to the east • Extension of the grid toward the east

16. TEN and its extension to the east • Prolongation of the east-west corridors

17. TEN and its extension to the east • Prolongation of the east-west corridors

18. TEN and its extension to the east • Prolongation of the east-west corridors

19. TEN and its extension to the east • Prolongation of the east-west corridors

20. TEN and its extension to the east Source: http://www.khvm.hu/EU-integracio/A_magyarorszagi_TINA_halozat/Image11.gif Helsinki, or Pan-European transport corridors

21. Dilemmas of the Central European Transport Policy in time of EU Enlargement • (1) Corridors (TEN) in western Europe were based on the internal demand of the area, namely on the necessity of the interconnection of well developed national networks (“Common network to the common market”) • (2) In the eastern part of Europe the starting point was external: the extension of the TEN network toward the east. Its priority is exaggerated in countries where internal connections also would need enforcement • (3) Furthermore, in Hungary interregional corridors are planned in a mistaken structure, strengthening the earlier single-centred hierarchy

22. TEN and its extension to the east Hungary plans to lead the transit traffic through its most heavily loaded areas that would need rather protection

24. EU Transport Policy 2001: „Time to Decide”

25. EU Transport Policy 2001: „Time to Decide” • Main problems to solve: congestion, isolated regions, quality problems, deteriorated environment, accidents • Balance of the consequences of the 1992 CTP • Main target: decoupling the link between the economic and the transport growth - focus on road transport through charging, - with efficiency measures in other modes, - targeted investments… …into the TEN networks… • Sixty measures – in four blocks. - shift the balance between modes of transport, - eliminate bottlenecks, - place users at the heart of transport policy, - manage the globalisation of transport.

26. EU Transport Policy 2001: „Time to Decide”

27. Summary • A transport policy collects the governmental strategies promoting the operation and development of activities belonging to the transport sector. • The basic documents of the transport policy of the past decade are the White Papers (CTP) of the European Union in 1992 and in 2001 (Time to Decide); while in Hungary the national Transport Policy of 1996 and 2004. • The documents of the EU earlier focused mainly on the overlay level of the networks between the single countries. Copying the unchanged priority of the construction of the corridors in domestic transport policies can be considered as a mistake. • Besides exaggerated priority of inter-regional axes, the Hungarian planners lead the through traffic across the conurbation of Budapest, in a single-centred structure, and built on that structure also the network of the logistic centres.

28. EU TRANSPORT POLICY - NEW DEVELOPMENTS THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION Tamás Fleischer Institute for World Economicsof the Hungarian Academy of Sciences http://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch <tfleisch@vki.hu> Working Group „EU-Relations” Alps Adriatic Working Community12th Meeting, Pécs, Europe House 28th April, 2005