1 / 68

Degenerations of algebras. José-Antonio de la Peña UNAM, México

Degenerations of algebras. José-Antonio de la Peña UNAM, México. Advanced School and Conference on Homological and Geometrical Methods in Representation Theory January18- February 5, 2010 . Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Table of contents . José-Antonio de la P eña.

ronat
Download Presentation

Degenerations of algebras. José-Antonio de la Peña UNAM, México

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Degenerations of algebras.José-Antonio de la PeñaUNAM, México Advanced School and Conference on Homological and Geometrical Methods in Representation Theory January18- February 5, 2010.

  2. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Table of contents.José-Antonio de la Peña

  3. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Notation.José-Antonio de la Peña

  4. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Notation: representations.José-Antonio de la Peña

  5. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Basic geometricconcepts.José-Antonio de la Peña

  6. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Basic geometricconcepts. Examples Let k be the field of complex numbers C. Let A2 be a two dimensional affine space over C. The polynomials ƒ in the ring k[x, y] can be viewed as complex valued functions on A2 by evaluating ƒ at the points in A2. Let S be the subset of k[x, y] containing a single element ƒ(x, y): The zero-locus of ƒ(x, y) the set of points in A2 on which this function vanishes: it is the set of all pairs of complex numbers (x,y) such that y = 1 − x, known as a line. This is the set Z(ƒ): Thus the subset V = Z(ƒ) of A2 is an algebraic set. The set V is not an empty set. It is irreducible, that is, it cannot be written as the union of two proper algebraic subsets. Let subset S of k[x, y] contain a single element g(x, y): The zero-locus of g(x, y), that is the set of points (x,y) such that x2+ y2 = 1, is a circle. The variety defined by is a cone. Hence the variety . . is the intersection of a cone and a plane, therefore a conic section.

  7. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: irreducibility.

  8. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Example: commuting matrices. The fact that commuting matrices have a common eigenvector – and hence by induction stabilize a common flag and are simultaneously triangularizable -- can be interpreted as a result of the Nullstellensatz, as follows: commuting matrices A1,…,As form a commutative algebra k[A1,…,As ] over the polynomial ring k[x1,…,xs] the matrices satisfy various polynomials such as their minimal polynomials, which form a proper ideal (because they are not all zero, in which case the result is trivial); one might call this the characteristic ideal, by analogy with the characteristic polynomial. Define an eigenvector for a commutative algebra as a vector v such that x(v)= λ(v)x for a linear functional and for all x in A. Observe that a common eigenvector, as if v is a common eigenvector, meaning Ai(v) = λiv, then the functional is defined as (treating scalars as multiples of the identity matrix A0: = I, which has eigenvalue 1 for all vectors), and conversely an eigenvector for such a functional λ is a common eigenvector. Geometrically, the eigenvalue corresponds to the point in affine k-space with coordinates with respect to the basis given by Ai. Then the existence of an eigenvalue λ is equivalent to the ideal generated by the Ai being non-empty. Observe this proof generalizes the usual proof of existence of eigenvalues.

  9. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Example: varieties of modules.José-Antonio de la Peña We consider the set of representatations of vector dimension (2,2,2). They satisfy the system of (polynomial!) equations: =0 This is the intersection of 4 quadrics and dim modA (2,2,2)=4. But this variety is not irreducible. Observe it contains two 4 dimensional affine spaces A4, which are irreducible components. t 0 0 t2 The map f: k modA (2,2,2), such that f(t)= , is polynomial 0 t t 0 in the coordinates, hence continuous in the Zariski topology. Observe that the lim t0 f(t) is a semisimple module.

  10. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: regular map.

  11. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: variety of algebras.

  12. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: action of groups.José-Antonio de la Peña A an algebra and g in GL(n) Ag has multiplication: a.b=gabg-1

  13. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: degenerations.José-Antonio de la Peña A B

  14. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: connectedness.

  15. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: genericstructures.

  16. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. DescribingAlg(n).

  17. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: Chevalleytheorem.José-Antonio de la Peña

  18. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts: uppersemicontinouos

  19. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 1. Geometricconcepts.José-Antonio de la Peña

  20. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Cohomology and deformations.José-Antonio de la Peña

  21. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Hochschildcohomology.José-Antonio de la Peña

  22. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Hochschildcohomology.José-Antonio de la Peña semidirect product gl dim A=s, then for t>s we have Ht (A)=0.

  23. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Hochschildcohomology.José-Antonio de la Peña Case n=1 in detail: V Hom(V,V) Hom(V V, V) f (a b f(a b) ) a (x ax – xa) 0

  24. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2.

  25. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Hochschilddim. isuppersemicontinous

  26. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Proof (cont.)José-Antonio de la Peña

  27. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Tangentspace.José-Antonio de la Peña • In algebraic geometry, the Zariski tangent space is a construction that defines a tangent space, at a point P on an algebraic varietyV . It does not use differential calculus, being based directly on abstract algebra. • For example, suppose given a plane curveC defined by a polynomial equation • F(X,Y) = 0 • and take P to be the origin (0,0). When F is considered only in terms of its first-degree terms, we get a 'linearised' equation reading • L(X,Y) = 0 • in which all terms XaYb have been discarded if a + b > 1. • We have two cases: L may be 0, or it may be the equation of a • line. In the first case the (Zariski) tangent space to C at (0,0) is • the whole plane, considered as a two-dimensional affine • space. In the second case, the tangent space is that line, • considered as affine space.

  28. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Tangentspaces (geometry).José-Antonio de la Peña

  29. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Hochschildcoh. and rigidity.

  30. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Hochschildcohomology and degenerations.José-Antonio de la Peña

  31. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. A toolforcalculation.José-Antonio de la Peña

  32. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Anexample.José-Antonio de la Peña

  33. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Formal deformations.José-Antonio de la Peña

  34. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Deformations as inverse of degenerations.José-Antonio de la Peña Alg(n) A

  35. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Lifting deformations.José-Antonio de la Peña

  36. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 2. Methodology of proofs.José-Antonio de la Peña

  37. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Tame and wild algebras.José-Antonio de la Peña

  38. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Tame and wild definitions.José-Antonio de la Peña

  39. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Thetamebehavior.José-Antonio de la Peña

  40. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. The wild behavior.José-Antonio de la Peña

  41. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Why wild algebras are ‘wild’?.José-Antonio de la Peña

  42. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Module varieties.José-Antonio de la Peña

  43. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Degenerations of modules.José-Antonio de la Peña GL(r)X

  44. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Indecomposable are constructible.José-Antonio de la Peña

  45. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Number of parameters.José-Antonio de la Peña

  46. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Tame and wild number of parameters..José-Antonio de la Peña

  47. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Degenerations of wild algebras.José-Antonio de la Peña

  48. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Anexample.José-Antonio de la Peña

  49. Degenerations of algebras. Lecture 3. Tameness and thestructure of the AR quiver .José-Antonio de la Peña

  50. Degenerations of algebras. Proof of proposition. Lecture 3. .José-Antonio de la Peña

More Related