1 / 77

CATALYSIS I . The HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION

CATALYSIS I . The HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION. THE HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION. Oldest process still in use Responsible for the production of materials from a homogeneous catalyzed reaction 100% atom recovery. THE HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION. O. R. cat. R. +. +. +. H. CO. R. H.

rona
Download Presentation

CATALYSIS I . The HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CATALYSIS I. The HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION

  2. THE HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION • Oldest process still in use • Responsible for the production of materials from a homogeneous catalyzed reaction • 100% atom recovery

  3. THE HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION O R cat R + + + H CO R H 2 H O "iso" "normal" branched product linear product Fig. 7.1. The hydroformylation reaction

  4. HYDROFORMYLATION THERMODYNAMICS H2 + CH3CH=CH2 + CO CH3CH2CH2C(O)H G 63 -138 -117 (l) = -42 kJ.mol-1 H 21 -109 -238 = -150 kJ.mol-1 H2 + CH3CH=CH2 CH3CH2CH3  G 63 -25 = -88 kJ.mol-1 H 21 -105 = -126 kJ.mol-1

  5. COBALT CATALYZED HYDROFORMYLATION REACTION • A prototype homogeneous metal catalysis - precatalyst to an active complex - steps involving organometallic reactions - 16 e to 18 e transition steps - possible geometries of intermediates

  6. STEP a • Formation of the catalytically active species (16 e) from HCo(CO)4 • HCo(CO)4 from Co2(CO)8 + synthesis gas (CO + H2) • Reaction conditions: • (200 – 300 bar, 120-170oC)

  7. STEP a Preferred geometry of the intermediate: (based on calculations)

  8. STEP b binding of the alkene to the active catalyst - forms 18 e complex

  9. STEP b Theoritical calculations indicate a slightly stable 4 (less steric hindrance). Structure 5 has the requisite coplanar geometry for Co, H, and the double bond C atoms)

  10. STEP c 1,2 alky insertion - reversible -elimination is highly possible but high CO partial pressure will stabilize the 18 e- complex

  11. STEP c initial 16e complex 18 e complexes upon CO addition

  12. Step d CO insertion (1,2 alkyl migration)

  13. STEP d 18e 16e

  14. STEPe oxidative addition (H2) – reductive elimination (product) sequence.

  15. STEP e

  16. 8. HydroformylationA comment about metal-ligand ratio Consider the following exercise. The catalytically active complex is involved in the following equilibrium: L + HM(CO) LHM(L) + CO The selective and fast catalyst species we want is HM(L) and we have determined that at a certain pressure we need a twenty-fold excess of L in order to have 95 % of M in the M(L) state. The concentration of M = 10-3 molar. Suppose we want to reduce the concentration of M to 10-5. What should we do with the concentration of L (at constant pressure of CO). What ratio L/M should one choose? What happens if the ratio is kept at 20? (calculate the equilibrium constant from the first example and then calculate the required concentration of L at M = 10-5 molar)

  17. HYDROFORMYLATIONRHODIUM CATALYSTS, MONODENTATES

  18. HydroformylationHydroformylation with rhodium phosphite/phosphines

  19. HydroformylationRhodium catalysts for propene Rh/triphenylphosphine: linearity 60 to 96 % Union Carbide Corporation, now Dow Chemicals 30 bar, at 120 °C, at highphosphine concentrations linearity 92%. 300 mol.mol-1(Rh).h-1. Low ligand concentrations, 10-20 mM, 1 mM Rh 10-20 bar and 90 °C low linearities (70%), 5-10,000 mol.mol-1(Rh).h-1.

  20. Rhodium TPP mechanism 1

  21. 8.3. Rhodium tpp mechanism, dimers Positive effect of raising H2 pressure

  22. 8.3. Rhodium cycle

  23. 8. HydroformylationKinetics, overall

  24. HydroformylationKinetics, resting state, type I

  25. 8. HydroformylationKinetics, rate equation, type I equation d'Oro v = k [C3H6]0.54[PPh3]-0.7[Rh]1 (conditions 90-110°C, 1-25 bar CO, 1-45 bar H2, PPh3/Rh ratio 300:1 to 7:1) “type I kinetics”

  26. 8.2.2. HydroformylationKinetics, resting state, type II

  27. 8. HydroformylationKinetics, rate equation, type II rate equation Garland v = k [RC(O)Rh(CO)4]1[CO]-1.1[H2]1[3,3-DMB]0.1 “type II kinetics”

  28. 8.2.2. Rhodium tpp cycle, type I kineticselectronic effects

  29. 8.4. Rhodium complex isomers for regioselectivepropene hf

  30. 8.4. Rhodium complex isomers;regioselectivity

  31. 8. Steric effects for regioselective hf Table 8.1. Hydroformylation of methyl-substituted 1-alkenes Alkene Rate, mol.mol-1.h-1 Linearity, % 1-pentene 11,300 78.4 4-Me-1-pentene 9,300 78.0 4,4-Me2-1-pentene 5,300 85.0 3-Me-1-pentene 9,600 91.0 3,3-Me2-1-pentene 7,600 99.0 Conditions: 90 °C, p(CO/H2) = 20 bar, [Rh]=0.5 mM, [PPh3]=5 mM, [alkene]=0.5 M, initial rates at <20% conversion, no isomerization was observed [18].

  32. 8. HydroformylationRhodium LPO stripping

  33. 8.5. HydroformylationRhodium LPO liquid

  34. 8.6. HydroformylationRhodium tppts Ruhrchemie-Rhone Poulenc 1986 Propene and 1-butene Same chemistry as tpp

  35. 8.7. HydroformylationRuhrchemie-Rhône Poulenc process

  36. 8.8. Hydroformylationone-phase, two phase

  37. 8.7. HydroformylationSummary of hydroformylation catalysts Catalyst Co Co/phosphine Rh/phosphine Pd/phosphine Pressure, bar 200 70 30 60 Temperature, °C 140 170 120 100 Substrate C3 C3 C3,4 internal C10+ terminal all Product aldehyde alcohol aldehyde aldehyde Linearity, % 60‑70 70‑90 70‑95 70-95 Alkane by‑product, %2 10‑15 0 ? Corrosion + + ‑ ? Metal deposition + + ‑ - Heavy ends + + ‑ ? Catalyst costs (Co=1) 1 10 1000 500

  38. 8. HydroformylationRhodium catalyst isomers for propene

  39. 8. HydroformylationMechanistic Scheme; Why Bidentates

  40. 8. HydroformylationNovel bidentates

  41. Ligand Bite angle Rate m.m–1.h–1 Ratio l:b 12 126 2550 2.6–4.3 BISBI, 11 113/120 3650 25 13 107 3200 4.4–12 DIOP [also 56] 102 3250 4.0–8.5 dppf [also 33] 99 3800 3.6–5 dppp 91 600 0.8–2.6 dppe 85 2.1 PPh3a 6000 2.4 8.9. Table 8.1. Hydroformylation; Novel bidentates

  42. 8. HydroformylationRhodium diphosphine catalysts • BISBI DIOP dppf dppe • Bite angle 113 107 102 99 85 • l/b ratio 66 12 8.5 2.4 • Devon, 1987, Casey, 1992 • 13 4-5 • Consiglio, 1973 Unruh, 1982

  43. 8. HydroformylationNovel bidentates 2

  44. 8. HydroformylationNovel bidentates 3 Linear/ branched = 10 (patent to Shell, 1987)

  45. 8.10. HydroformylationBite angles in Xantphos ligands

  46. 8. HydroformylationGeometry of bidentate Xantphos/rhodium

  47. Table 8.2. HydroformylationBite angle effects in Xantphos ligands Hydroformylation of octene-1 (1.2 M) X n l/b H, H 102 7 PPh 105 18 SiMe2 109 34 S 111 41 C=CMe2 112 50

  48. 8. HydroformylationBite angle effects, steric hindrance

More Related