1 / 13

Higgs search in H  ZZ/WW decay channels with the CMS detector

Higgs search in H  ZZ/WW decay channels with the CMS detector. Claude Charlot LLR - École Polytechnique for the CMS collaboration. Outline. LHC & CMS detector SM Higgs at the LHC H  WW  ll  selection H  ZZ  llll selection Expected sensitivity for both channels

romeo
Download Presentation

Higgs search in H  ZZ/WW decay channels with the CMS detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Higgs search in HZZ/WW decay channels with the CMS detector Claude Charlot LLR - École Polytechnique for the CMS collaboration

  2. Outline • LHC & CMS detector • SM Higgs at the LHC • HWWll selection • HZZllll selection • Expected sensitivity for both channels • Combined sensitivity • 10 TeV projection • Conclusions

  3. The Large Hadron Collider • pp collider at CERN, s=14 TeV • Start operation in late 2009 • 10 TeV for this run • ~200pb-1 expected by automn 2010 • Two general multi-purpose experiments • CMS and ATLAS • understanding EWK symmetry breaking among the main goals

  4. The CMS Detector SUPERCONDUCTING HCAL Scintillating PbWO4 crystals(~80000 ) 36 supermodules (EB) 4 dees (EE) Preshower (EE) 3.8T ECAL COIL Plastic scintillator/brass sandwich ||<2.6 TRACKER ||<2.4 silicium (200m2) PIXEL (rT<11cm) 3 layers (barrel) 2x2disks (fwd) SST (rT<120cm) >8 hits, depending on  MUON MUON BARREL Drift Tube Resistive Plate Cathode Strip Chambers weight: 12,500 t diameter: 15 m length: 21.6 m Drift tubes (||<1.2) Cathode strip chambers (0.9<||<2.4) Resistive plate chambers e: (E)/E ~ 0.5% @100 GeV : (p)/p ~ 1% @100 GeV

  5. SM Higgs at the LHC • Higgs production cross-section (NLO): 0.1-50 fb • gluon fusion dominates at LHC • Especialy at low mH • Factor ~10 @ 100 GeV • Here results for inclusive production • HWW(*) and HZZ(*) are main discovery channels • Highest BRs for mH>~2mW • Clean leptonic decay modes • BR(Wl): 10.8%; BR(Zl+l-):3.4% • Cover high mH region and down to ~2mW

  6. HWWll: selection • Event topology: 2 isolated high pT leptons + ET miss, no hadr. activity • Main backgrounds: tt, Drell-Yan, WW, WZ, ZZ, tW, W+jets Jets: ET>15 GeV ||<2.5 • Preselection to select leptonic WW events • Single lepton triggers • Exactly 2 isolated leptons opp. charge • pT1,2>10 GeV or at least one pT>20 GeV • ETmiss > 30 GeV • mll>12 GeV • Main selection observables • Central jet veto • Angular correlations btw leptons • Dilepton mass, ETmiss, leptons pT • Other discriminants also used in NN analysis After preselection and CJV

  7. HZZllll: selection • Event topology : 4 isolated leptons • Main backgrounds (after presel.): tt, Zbb , ZZ • Preselection to supress backgds involving fake leptons • Single and double lepton triggers • >=2 pairs of opposite charge, matching flavors leptons • pTlepton>5 GeV • mll>12 GeV (all pairs) • m4l>100 GeV (at least one) • Loose isolation • Selection to further reduce irreducible backgds (mH independant ) • Isolation (Iso3+Iso4), IP • pTe>7 GeV, pT>5GeV • 50< mZ<100 GeV • 20<mZ*<100 GeV

  8. Systematics and control from data • Lepton efficiencies measured from Zll candel using tag and probe method • In WW analysis, control of background is crucial • tt and WW from control region close to signal region but with low signal contribution • tt using signal preselection but inverting the CJV (2 jets) • WW using signal preselection and mll>115 GeV • W+jets from P(jetlepton) from jet triggers and using signal selection with only 1 identified lepton (pT>20) and 1 jet (pT>10) • In ZZ analysis, systematic on lepton isolation from UE and pileup estimated using random cone technique • ZZ background normalisation from Z data, using ZZ/Z MC ratio • Zbb by inverting the isolation cuts and using mZ cut to separate from tt and W/Z+jets

  9. HWWll: results • Likelihood ratio method • S = -2lnQ • Q = LS+B/LB • Systematic errors included 14 TeV 1fb-1 14 TeV, ∫Ldt=1fb-1 14 TeV 1fb-1  SM Higgs could be discovered for mH~2mW with 1fb-1

  10. HZZllll: results 14 TeV, ∫Ldt=1fb-1 • Counting experiment • For each mH hypothesis, count events within mH2mH • Sliding window central value (m4l) and  from MC • Systematic errors included  SM-like Higgs could be excluded for 185< mH<250GeV with 1fb-1

  11. HZZ/WW: combined sensitivity • Combine channels using two different approaches: Bayesian and CLs • Different assumptions on correlations between systematic errors • CLs/Bayesian ~0.91 on average  SM-like Higgs could be excluded for mH >140 GeVfor 1fb-1

  12. HZZ/WW: 10 TeV projection • Most important effect is change in cross-section • ggH: 10 TeV/14 TeV is ~0.54 • WW/ZZ: 10 TeV/14 TeV is ~0.65 J. Stirling • Here simple rescaling of signal and main backgrounds yields from the 14 TeV analyses • Full analyses for 10 TeV are underway  1410 TeV is approximately equivalent to a loss of a factor two in sensitivity

  13. Conclusions • New CMS analyses for HWW and HZZ in leptonic modesin the context of an initial scenario • Simple cut based as well as multivariate selections (HWW) have been studied • Methods for background estimation and control from data • SM Higgs could be discovered at 5 around mH=160 GeV in WW decay mode with 1fb-1 • SM Higgs could be excluded for 185<mH<250 GeV in ZZ decay mode with 1fb-1 • Using both channels, SM Higgs could be excluded for mH>140 GeV with 1fb-1 • 10 TeV bottom line: a loss of sensitivity by a factor ~2  CMS is looking forward to the first LHC data!

More Related