Download

The first step in energy management Andrew Ibbotson Joe Flanagan






Advertisement
/ 192 []
Download Presentation
Comments
rollin
From:
|  
(1220) |   (0) |   (0)
Views: 75 | Added:
Rate Presentation: 0 0
Description:
Energy Survey Workshop . The first step in energy management Andrew Ibbotson Joe Flanagan. What is an energy survey? . For a site, dept, or process Establishes the energy cost and consumption Is a technical investigation of the energy flows
The first step in energy management Andrew Ibbotson Joe Flanagan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be sold or licensed nor shared on other sites. SlideServe reserves the right to change this policy at anytime. While downloading, If for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.











- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




The first step in energy management andrew ibbotson joe flanagan l.jpgSlide 1

Energy Survey Workshop

The first step in energy management

Andrew Ibbotson

Joe Flanagan

What is an energy survey l.jpgSlide 2

What is an energy survey?

For a site, dept, or process

  • Establishes the energy cost and consumption

  • Is a technical investigation of the energy flows

  • Aims to identify cost effective energy savings

  • Examines both the technical and ‘soft’ management issues.

Why carry out a survey l.jpgSlide 3

Why carry out a survey?

  • Identify savings

  • Establish the viability of an energy management programme

  • Establish a ‘baseline’

The energy management process l.jpgSlide 4

Identify where Energy is Used and Develop an Action Plan

Survey

Senior Management Commitment

Measure Energy Consumption and Production

Review Performance and Action Plan

Develop Targets

Implement Energy Saving Measures

Produce Reports to Monitor Energy Use Against Output

The Energy Management Process

Diy or consultant l.jpgSlide 5

DIY or Consultant?

Consultant

  • Expertise

  • Fresh pair of eyes

  • Should not be afraid to poke into any corner

  • Opinions may carry more weight

  • Job will be completed

DIY

  • No cost

  • No learning curve

  • Projects should be viable

Choosing a consultant l.jpgSlide 6

Choosing a Consultant

  • Salesman or consultant?

  • Ensure he/she is experienced in your process

  • Don’t be afraid to take up references

  • Cost - day rate of fixed price

The survey process l.jpgSlide 7

The Survey Process

  • Define the scope

  • Establish energy balances

  • Identify priority areas

  • Identify energy saving projects

    • Low cost (control, housekeeping, awareness)

    • Medium cost (revenue expenditure <1 year payback)

    • High cost (capital expenditure <2-3 year payback)

  • Reporting

How much effort is required l.jpgSlide 8

How much effort is required?

Depends upon

  • complexity of the site and scope

  • Level of detail available (esp. sub-meters)

  • Size and energy intensity

  • Rule of thumb

    • Up to €200,000 – 6 mandays

    • Up to €1,000,000 – 10-15 mandays

Scope l.jpgSlide 9

Scope

  • Electricity, gas, oil, solid fuel etc

  • ?Water, effluent, industrial gases

  • In general further detailed study will be required for medium and high cost opportunities

Energy balances and data analysis l.jpgSlide 10

Energy Balances and Data Analysis

  • Last 12 months bills

  • Sub-meter readings

  • Principal energy users

  • Production and climatic data

  • 1st Law of Thermodynamics – energy can neither be created or destroyed

Electricity bills l.jpgSlide 11

Electricity Bills

  • Maximum Demand charges (kVA, kW)

  • Capacity charges (kVA, kW)

  • Day and night rates

  • Power factor

Power factor l.jpgSlide 12

kWh

φ

kVArh

kVAh

Power Factor

PF = kWh/kVAh

= cos φ

From the electricity bill

kWh = 17,400

kVArh = 8,700

What is the power factor?

Power factor13 l.jpgSlide 13

Power factor

tan φ = 8,700/17,400

= 0.5

φ = 26.5º

cos 26.5 = 0.89

PF improved by adding capacitors

Worthy of further investigation below 0.85-0.90

Gas bills l.jpgSlide 17

Gas Bills

  • More frequently estimated (in the UK)

  • Errors more prevalent

  • Very rarely obtain ½ hourly demand

  • Can obtain some useful energy management information

Slide18 l.jpgSlide 18

‘Base’ or process gas load

Electrical balance l.jpgSlide 20

Electrical Balance

  • Sub-meters help – but rarely provide all the required information

  • Need to list major electrical consumers (pumps, fans, compressors, chillers, lighting, process heating etc)

  • Need rating and running hours

Estimating electricity l.jpgSlide 21

Estimating Electricity

Estimating electricity22 l.jpgSlide 22

Design kW = rating on equipment

e.g. plate rating of a motor; wattage of a bulb

Estimating Electricity

Estimating electricity23 l.jpgSlide 23

Actual kW = best estimate of actual power

e.g. based on ammeter reading or design data

Estimating Electricity

kW = √3*V * I * PF

Estimating electricity24 l.jpgSlide 24

Load factor allows for variable load

e.g. air compressor on load / off load

Estimating Electricity

Estimating electricity25 l.jpgSlide 25

Total should = metered total

either for whole site or for a sub-meter

Estimating Electricity

Estimating electricity26 l.jpgSlide 26

Estimating Electricity

  • High accuracy is time consuming

  • ±10% is very good

  • Portable data logger useful for large users

  • Don’t underestimate the large number of small users e.g. conveyors, fans, pumps

Electricity balance l.jpgSlide 27

Electricity Balance

Fuel balances l.jpgSlide 28

Fuel Balances

  • Process vs. space heating from a year of monthly or weekly data

  • Difficult to estimate the distribution among process users if there is no metering

  • Most gas process plant will operate well below MCR – manufacturers specification

  • No portable gas metering

Could chp be feasible l.jpgSlide 29

Could CHP be feasible?

  • Power demand >500 kW

  • Coincident heat (steam or hot water) demand?

  • Heat to power 3:1

  • High operating hours > 2 shift 5d/week

Benchmarking l.jpgSlide 30

Benchmarking

  • Comparison to a published benchmark often seen as method for estimating savings

  • Treat with caution

    • ‘best practice’ often refers to ‘state of the art’

    • Utilisation has a large influence

  • Generally confirms what you already know

  • Greatest validity for ‘basic’ industry – metals, ceramics, glass etc..

  • Lots of information at www.actionenergy.org.uk

Boilers steam systems l.jpgSlide 31

Boilers & Steam Systems

Scope32 l.jpgSlide 32

Scope

Basic combustion process l.jpgSlide 33

Basic Combustion Process

Natural gas

8N2 + CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + 2H2O + 8N2

Plus the release of ~10 kWh/m3 of CH4

10 volumes of air required for 1 volume of methane

Heat recovery process l.jpgSlide 34

Heat Recovery Process

Gas Passes -

convection

Burner

Furnace Tube - radiation

Boiler losses l.jpgSlide 35

Exhaust

(~20% on gas, ~16% on oil)

Convection &

Radiation

(1% to 1.5% @

max continuous

rating (mcr))

Air & Fuel

Blowdown

(<5%)

Boiler Losses

Convection proportional to T

Radiation proportional to T4

Combustion losses l.jpgSlide 36

Combustion Losses

  • heat loss in flue gases

  • Latent heat of water vapour in flue gases

  • incomplete carbon combustion

  • ‘Excess’ air must be kept to a minimum

  • Generally at least 10% excess is required to ensure good combustion

  • Combustion losses depend upon volume and temperature of flue gases

Excess air l.jpgSlide 37

Excess Air

  • measured by inference from O2 in exhaust or level of CO2 in exhaust

  • Portable instrument (measures O2, temp and CO

  • Permanent zirconia probe in stack linked to air/gas valves (oxygen trim)

Best boiler efficiency l.jpgSlide 39

Best Boiler Efficiency

  • optimised fuel / air ratio well insulated (shiny surface)

  • clean burner nozzles

  • clean boiler surfaces

  • minimum steam pressure / temperature

  • reasonable load (~80%)

  • optimised TDS controlling blowdown

Combustion l.jpgSlide 40

Combustion

  • 1% efficiency increase, 79% to 80% savers 1- 0.8 = 1.25% fuel

    • reduction of 02 by ~2%

    • reduction of exhaust temperature by ~20ºC

  • oxygen trim control; 1% to 1.5% on well adjusted boiler

  • Air preheat (duct from air compressors or boilerhouse) saving 0.5% to 1%

Blowdown l.jpgSlide 41

Blowdown

  • maintaining recommended TDS levels ensures clean heat transfer surfaces

  • operating low TDS waste energy, water, chemicals and increases effluent costs

  • heat recovery (for large boilers payback 2-3 years)

Other l.jpgSlide 42

Other

  • check optimum load on boilers

  • rank multiple boilers to operate the group with minimum loss

  • Shutdown Loss Minimisation

    • gas side isolation with dampers

    • water/steam side isolation with crown valve

Heat recovery l.jpgSlide 43

Heat Recovery

  • economiser (to feedwater)

  • recuperator (to wash water)

Insulation l.jpgSlide 44

Insulation

  • check existing quality

  • insulate all hot pipework, flanges (1m pipe), valve bodies (5m pipe)

  • hotwell cover and insulation

Key points for the boiler house l.jpgSlide 45

Key Points for the Boiler House

Check

  • Boiler efficiency

  • Blowdown procedure

  • Condensate return

  • insulation

The nature of steam l.jpgSlide 46

The Nature of Steam

Item Heat Content

KJ/kg %

Latent at 7 bar g 2050 74

Flash at Atmospheric from 7 bar g 300 11

Condensate at Atmospheric 420 15

Total 2770 100

Breakdown of heat content of 7 bar g saturated steam

System standing losses l.jpgSlide 47

System Standing Losses

Fixed loss from:

  • Pipework

  • Valves

  • Fittings etc.

    Losses range from 2% to 5%

System variable losses l.jpgSlide 48

System Variable Losses

Flash and % losses with steam at

condensate ? bar g & cond. at 0 bar g

return 7 5 3 0

Total loss 26 24 22 15

50% cond. return 19 17 15 7

Management control l.jpgSlide 49

Management Control

  • Automatic isolation systems

  • Pressure reduction

  • Energy management:

    • Metering

    • Data analysis

    • Action

Fixed losses l.jpgSlide 50

Fixed Losses

  • Insulation

  • air ingress

  • steam leaks

Pipework l.jpgSlide 51

Pipework

  • Size:

    • cost trade-off

  • Installation:

    • air removal

    • condensate drainage

    • weather sealing

    • group users

Pressure reduction l.jpgSlide 52

Pressure Reduction

  • More efficient

  • Saves fuel

  • Cost incurred for:

    • pressure reduction sets

    • larger heat exchangers

    • larger traps

  • Consider life cycle costs

Steam leaks l.jpgSlide 53

Steam Leaks

1000

800

12.5 mm

600

400

10 mm

7.5 mm

200

100

5 mm

80

60

40

3 mm

20

10

Examples:

Steam Leak = 7.5mm diameter

Steam Pressure (barg) ( or pressure difference between steam and condensate) = 6 bar

Steam Loss = 100 kg/h

8

6

4

3

3

4

5

7

10

14

2

Steam trapping air venting l.jpgSlide 54

Steam Trapping & Air Venting

  • Steam trapping

    • function

    • testing

    • group trapping

    • sizing traps

  • Air venting

  • Scale and dirt removal

Condensate recovery l.jpgSlide 55

Condensate Recovery

Saves costs for:

  • Water

  • Treatment chemicals

  • Fuel

  • Effluent

    Produces rapid payback

Flash steam recovery l.jpgSlide 56

Flash Steam Recovery

By:

  • Indirect method

  • Direct method

    Potential sinks:

  • BFW

  • Wash water

  • Process fluid

  • Space heating

Key points for steam systems l.jpgSlide 57

Key Points for Steam Systems

  • Pipe insulation

  • Leaks

  • Isolation of redundant plant/off line plant

  • Steam traps

  • Condensate return

Lighting l.jpgSlide 58

Lighting

Lighting59 l.jpgSlide 59

Lighting

  • Overview of main industrial lighting types

  • Their efficiency

  • Common savings

Lighting60 l.jpgSlide 60

Lighting

  • Typically 10-50% of electricity use

  • Good lighting is critical to all manufacturing operations

  • Survey is relatively easy to carry out

Estimate of load l.jpgSlide 61

Estimate of Load

  • Rating of lamp

  • Number

  • Operating hours

  • Add 10% for control gear

Common industrial lighting types l.jpgSlide 62

Common Industrial Lighting Types

  • Fluorescent

    • Offices, general manufacturing

    • Good colour rendering

    • Instant instantaneous on and off

  • Metal Halide (HPI, MBI)

    • Good colour rendering

  • High Pressure Sodium (SON)

    • Poor colour rendering

  • Low Pressure Sodium (SOX)

    • Very poor colour (orange yellow)

    • Very efficient

Comparison of lamp types l.jpgSlide 63

Comparison of Lamp Types

Typical illuminance levels l.jpgSlide 64

Typical Illuminance Levels

Savings with fluorescents l.jpgSlide 65

Savings with Fluorescents

  • Change T12 for T8

  • Control (PIR, zoning, daylight)

  • New systems

    • High frequency ballasts

    • High efficiency reflectors/diffusers

    • Payback 2-4 years

Savings with metal halides l.jpgSlide 66

Savings with Metal Halides

  • Convert to SON (beware of colour issues)

  • Payback ~1 year if replace 400W MBF to 250W SON (8760h/y). Cost of SON €100

  • Convert to fluorescent if switching off is possible

Top tips for lighting l.jpgSlide 67

Top Tips for Lighting

  • Lux measurement is worthwhile

  • Switch off

  • Need high lighting hours (2 shift) to justify replacement

  • Plenty of suppliers will carry out free surveys

Compressed air l.jpgSlide 68

Compressed Air

Compressed air69 l.jpgSlide 69

Compressed Air

  • Background to Compressed Air

  • Reducing loads and pressure

  • Improving distribution

  • Improving generation

Compressed air70 l.jpgSlide 70

Compressed Air

  • very expensive form of energy

    • typically costs 1€/kWh

  • often used unnecessarily or inappropriately

    • Cooling, cleaning etc

  • similar philosophy to steam / refrigeration

    • minimise loads and pressures

    • minimise distribution system losses

    • maximise generation efficiency

Potential savings l.jpgSlide 71

Potential Savings

  • Compressed air can account for up to 20% electricity use.

  • Enviros study identified minimum potential savings of 27%

    • generation (7%)

    • distribution (11%)

    • end usage (3%)

    • new technology (6%)

Compressed air system components l.jpgSlide 72

Compressed Air System Components

What to look out for use l.jpgSlide 73

What to look out for - use

  • Leaks

  • Main uses of air such as tools, painting, instrumentation or process

  • Misuses such as open ended lances, full pressure blow guns, product ejection and vacuum venturis

  • End of line pressure

  • Ring or spur mains?

Check each load l.jpgSlide 74

Check Each Load

  • why is air being used

    • a key requirement or ‘habit’?

  • can a load be eliminated or reduced

    • replace pneumatic valves with electric

    • ‘amplifier’ nozzles

  • pressure and air quality requirements

    • is it as low as possible

    • how does it compare with other loads

Distribution l.jpgSlide 75

Distribution

  • Three main issues:

  • pressure drops

  • water

  • leaks

The distribution system l.jpgSlide 76

The Distribution System

  • examine the pressure drop across the system (velocity 6-9 m/s)

  • pipework is rarely upgraded when system extended

  • small bore pipe, elbows and short bends increase pressure drop

  • internal corrosion increases friction losses

  • A 1 bar pressure drop increases energy cost by 10%

Distribution lines the effect of water l.jpgSlide 77

Distribution Lines – The Effect of Water

  • Problems with water

    • Causes corrosion

    • Product quality

    • Increases pressure drops

  • Is drying adequate? Additional automatic drain points

Leakage losses l.jpgSlide 78

Leakage Losses

  • typically 25 - 50% of full load usage!

  • regular maintenance required to identify and repair leaks especially where flexible connections are used

  • identify and tag leaks at the weekend when production areas are quiet

Leak reduction l.jpgSlide 79

Leak reduction

Leakage losses80 l.jpgSlide 80

Leakage Losses

Some ways of reducing losses l.jpgSlide 81

Some Ways of Reducing Losses

  • Isolate air supplies outside working hours

    • to the machines

    • Interlock air supply with machinery

    • to areas of the factory with different working hours

  • Use the lowest possible operating pressure

    • reduce pressure locally if possible

  • If some consumers use low pressure air install a separate system

Life cycle costs of compressor l.jpgSlide 82

75%

Energy Cost

10%

Maintenance

15%

Capital

Life Cycle Costs of Compressor

What to look out for in the compressor room l.jpgSlide 83

What to look out for in the Compressor Room

  • Type, make, capacity, hours run and control of each compressor

  • Type make and configuration of treatment package

  • Room ventilation, inlets in or outside?

  • Is waste heat recovered?

  • What is the generation pressure?

  • Is there a group controller?

  • What is the estimated demand?

  • Are the feeding mains OK are there any other bottlenecks?

  • Do they have electronic zero loss condensate traps?

Filtration l.jpgSlide 84

Filtration

  • Filters cause pressure drops.

    • To save energy meet the minimum requirement

    • Undersizing raises pressure drop

    • Every 25mbar pressure drop increases compressor power consumption by 2%

Drying l.jpgSlide 85

Drying

  • Ambient air at 15oC contains about 12.5g water per cubic metre

  • Most condenses in the aftercooler

    • An after cooler might remove 68% of the water in the air if cooled to 35oC

  • Further drying is usually necessary

    • Deliquescent - energy efficient, cheap

    • Refrigerated - popular, 3-5% energy cost (dew point 3ºC)

    • Desiccant – air regenerated can consume 15-20% of air produced (dew point -60ºC)

Guidelines for drying l.jpgSlide 86

Guidelines for Drying

  • Generally design to dry air to 6ºC below ambient temperature

  • Don’t run pipework outside if possible

  • Only dry as much air as is necessary (i.e. have a separate wet and dry system)

Compressor efficiencies l.jpgSlide 87

3

Configuration

Capacity Nm

/h

Specific Power

Control

3

kWh/Nm

2-25

14.2

Good with step unloading and low

Lubricated Piston

25-250

11.8

off load power

250-1,000

10.0

2-25

15.3

Good with step unloading and low

Oil Free Piston

25-250

13.0

off load power

250-1,000

11.2

2-25

14.2

High power on part load

Lubricated Screw/Vane

25-250

12.4

250-1,000

11.2

25-250

11.9

Two step with good part load power

Oil Free Screw

250-1,000

10.6

1,000-2,000

10.6

250-1,000

12.4

Good over modulation range

Centrifugal

1,000-2,000

10.6

Above 2,000

10.0

Compressor Efficiencies

Reciprocating compressors l.jpgSlide 88

Reciprocating Compressors

  • Single or multi stage

  • Idling losses normally around 25% of full load current

  • Relatively efficient on part load

  • Valve deterioration reduces efficiency

  • Noisy

  • High maintenance

Rotary screw compressors l.jpgSlide 89

Rotary Screw Compressors

  • Normally provide cleaner air

  • Most popular unit

  • Packaged units available with integral heat recovery

  • Very efficient if run with variable speed control

  • Unloaded power greater than reciprocating machines

Centrifugal compressors l.jpgSlide 90

Centrifugal Compressors

  • High capacity base load machines

  • Large machines have very good efficiency on full load

  • Part load operation achieved by inlet throttling modulation

  • Modulation should only be used around full load conditions, very poor efficiency at low loads

Rotary sliding vane l.jpgSlide 91

Rotary Sliding Vane

  • Normally used for less demanding duties

  • Generally low capital cost machines

  • Used for single shift operations

  • No integral heat recovery

  • Part load operation very inefficient

Control general rules l.jpgSlide 92

Control - General Rules

  • On/off control (where possible) is better than variable speed, which is better than modulating control

  • Modern control systems can select the optimum combination of compressors

  • For multiple compressors check hours run and loaded meters

Modulating and variable speed control l.jpgSlide 93

Modulating and Variable Speed Control

Modulating

100%

Power

Variable Speed

Output

100%

50%

Heat recovery94 l.jpgSlide 94

Process

Drying

Heating

Building Services

Space Heating

Water Heating

Compressed Air Treatment

Dryers

Boiler Pre-heating

Feed Water

Combustion Air

Heat Recovery

Into air or water for:

Heat recovery example l.jpgSlide 95

Heat Recovery Example

  • A 20kW compressor would satisfy the combustion air requirements of a 1 MW boiler

  • For each 20oC rise in combustion air temperature there is an approximate 1% rise in boiler efficiency.

  • If this air is at 60oC, an efficiency increase of 3% may result.

Heat recovery potential l.jpgSlide 96

Heat Recovery Potential

Intake air temperature l.jpgSlide 97

Intake Air Temperature

For every 4C that the intake air temperature falls:

The energy required for compression falls by 1%

Intake air temperature example l.jpgSlide 98

Intake Air Temperature - Example

  • A compressor draws air from a plant room that is typically at 25oC, and consumes 75kW

  • The average UK/Ireland outside air temperature is 10oC

  • Taking the air from outside means that the average temperature is 15oC lower

  • Saving 3.75%, 2.8kW, £1000/yr

Summary l.jpgSlide 99

Summary

  • compressed air is very expensive

    • often equivalent to >50p/kWh

  • only use when really necessary

  • minimise system pressure

  • minimise leaks

    • simplify distribution

    • isolate unused sections

  • optimise generation efficiency

Top tips l.jpgSlide 100

Top Tips

  • Check compressor instrumentation (hrs run, on-load etc.)

  • Simple ‘rotameters’ for (temporary) flow measurement are very cheap

  • Install automatic drain traps

  • Look carefully what happens at meal breaks, shift changes and weekends

Energy management l.jpgSlide 101

Energy Management

Slide103 l.jpgSlide 103

Shape

Description

Diagnosis

1

High Balanced

Score 3 or more on all columns

Excellent performance; the challenge is to maintain this high standard

2

Low Balanced

Balanced score of less than 3 on all columns

Is this balance a symptom or orderly progress or stagnation

3

U-shaped

The two outside columns are significantly higher

Expectations have been raised

Slide104 l.jpgSlide 104

Shape

Description

Diagnosis

4

N-shaped

The two outside columns are significantly lower

Achievement in the centre is likely to be wasted

5

Trough

A single column is significantly lower than the rest

Underachievement in this column may well hold back success elsewhere

6

Peak

A single column is significant higher than the rest

Effort in this area could be wasted by lack of progress elsewhere

7

Unbalanced

Two or more columns are 2 points above or below average

The more imbalance the harder it is to perform well

Refrigeration l.jpgSlide 105

Refrigeration

General comments l.jpgSlide 106

General comments

  • Refrigeration systems are often complex

  • Maintenance often sub-contracted

  • Poor energy efficiency not obvious

  • Savings potential is good ~20%

The refrigeration process 1 l.jpgSlide 107

Condenser

Ambient Cooling Stream

Substance Being Cooled

Evaporator

The Refrigeration Process (1)

High pressure liquid

High pressure vapour

Expansion valve

Compressor

High P

Low P

Low pressure vapour

Low pressure liquid/vapour

Refrigerants a few examples l.jpgSlide 110

Refrigerants - A Few Examples

  • Ammonia R717

  • CFCs R11, R12, R502

  • HCFC R22

  • Pure HFCs R134a, R32

  • HCFC blends R403B, R408A

  • HFC blends R404A, R507

  • Hydrocarbons R290

System efficiency l.jpgSlide 111

System Efficiency

Coefficient of Performance (COP) = useful cooling/system power

Theoretical efficiency (Carnot efficiency)= Te/(Tc – Te) (T is degK)

Useful approximation COP=0.6Te/(Tc – Te)

Chillers often specified in tons (US) 1 ton = 200 BTU/min (3.52kW)

Measurement of t c t e l.jpgSlide 112

Measurement of Tc & Te

  • Often chillers only equipped with pressure gauges

  • Pressure can be converted temp. if refrigerant is known

Typical compressor cops l.jpgSlide 113

Typical Compressor COPs

COP

Air Conditioning 15°C 5

Chilling 3°C 4

Freezing -30°C 2

Calculation of cop l.jpgSlide 114

Calculation of COP

  • Need to know

  • Compressor power

  • Flow/return temps of primary/secondary refrigerant

  • Flow rate of primary/secondary refrigerant

  • Thermodynamic properties/specific heat of primary/secondary refrigerant

  • Only possible on large systems

Improving cop l.jpgSlide 115

Improving COP

  • From Carnot = Te/(Tc – Te) theoretical efficiency increases as:

  • Tc – Te approach 0

  • Te increases for the same temperature lift (Tc – Te)

Increasing t e l.jpgSlide 116

Increasing Te

  • Efficient heat transfer in evaporator

    • Clean heat exchange surfaces (e.g. ice on evaporator)

  • Avoid overcooling of product

    • e.g. product stored at -20ºC, but freezer cools to -30ºC

  • Temperature set point unnecessarily; low ΔT between refrigerant and process liquid <5ºC

    • Two stage cooling

  • Increase Te 1ºC increases efficiency by ~3%

Condensers l.jpgSlide 117

Condensers

  • Water cooled shell and tube (with CT)

    • Water approach temp 5ºC

    • Water temp rise ~ 5ºC

    • Condensing temp 15 ºC greater than wet bulb

  • Air cooled

    • Condensing temp 15 ºC greater than air

  • Evaporative condensers

    • Similar to shell and tube

  • Decrease Tc 1ºC increases efficiency by ~3%

Compressor performance l.jpgSlide 118

Compressor Performance

% of full load COP

100

Centrifugal

and screw

50

Reciprocating

0%

100%

% of full duty

Modular design 3 water chillers l.jpgSlide 119

Modular Design, 3 water chillers

Case study a poor part load control of 3 modular water chillers l.jpgSlide 120

Case Study (a) poor part load control of 3 modular water chillers

Load % Power kW

Compressor 1 33 90

2 33 90

3 33 90

Chilled water pumps 1 100 25

2 100 25

3 100 25

Condenser pumps 1 100 20

2 100 20

3 100 20

Total Power Absorbed - 405

Case study b good control l.jpgSlide 121

Case Study (b) good control

Load % Power kW

Compressor 1 100 150

2 0 0

3 0 0

Chilled water pumps 1 100 25

2 0 0

3 0 0

Condenser pumps 1 100 20

2 0 0

3 0 0

Total Power Absorbed - 195

What can be easily assessed l.jpgSlide 122

What can be easily assessed?

  • If possible calculate COP

  • Minimise cooling loads

    • Free cooling in HVAC systems

    • Two stage

    • Cold store housekeeping

  • Check ΔTs

    • Condition of heat exchangers

Using variable speed drives and efficient motors l.jpgSlide 123

Using Variable Speed Drives and Efficient Motors

Content l.jpgSlide 124

Content

  • Background to Motors and Drives

  • Using High Efficiency Motors

  • Using soft starts for better control

  • Using voltage controllers for partly loaded motors

  • Using variable speed drives

Motor and drives l.jpgSlide 125

Motor and Drives

  • constitute over half of industrial electrical demand

  • overall saving potential - 10% across Industrial & Commercial sectors

  • A motor will consume its capital cost in just a month of continuous operation. SoThe capital investment is insignificant compared to running costs.

Motor operation costs l.jpgSlide 126

Motor Operation Costs

132kW motor, cost £3600, efficiency 93%

22kW motor, cost £660, efficiency 90%

Electricity cost 4p/kWh, both motors fully loaded

Typical motor efficiency simplified l.jpgSlide 127

Typical Motor Efficiency (simplified)

Nominal motor efficiency v rating l.jpgSlide 128

Nominal Motor Efficiency v. Rating

Motor Efficiency %

Motor Rating (kW)

The european efficiency labeling scheme l.jpgSlide 129

The European EfficiencyLabeling Scheme

% Efficiency

kW

1.1

90

Slide130 l.jpgSlide 130

12

9

6

3

0

Full

Load

Power

Loss

(%)

Total Loss

I2R (copper) loss

stray loss

iron loss

friction and windage

0 40 80 120

Load (%)

High efficiency motors l.jpgSlide 131

High Efficiency Motors

  • reduced Iron (Steel) Losses

  • reduced copper Losses

  • stray losses minimised

  • more efficient motor generates less heat

High efficiency versus standard motors payback period l.jpgSlide 133

High Efficiency Versus Standard Motors Payback Period

New Motor - 7.5 kW

Hours of Electricity Additional Payback

Usage p.a. Cost Savings Costs Years

£ p.a. £

2000 36 83 2.3

4000 72 83 1.2

6000 108 83 0.8

At 4p/kWh for electricity, the

incremental cost payback occurs after about

5000 hours.

High efficiency motors conclusions l.jpgSlide 134

High Efficiency Motors - Conclusions

  • most suitable for highly loaded motors

  • justified on new or replacement motors

    • rewinds introduce extra losses – buy HEM instead of rewinding

  • on 4,000 hrs or more operation, marginal payback just over a year

Switch it off l.jpgSlide 135

Switch it off!

  • don’t leave motors running needlessly

  • fit automatic controls to avoid motors being left on

    • e.g. timers or load sensors on conveyors

  • look for fixed loads

    • e.g. tank mixers – why not switch motor off for 1 minute every 5 with a saving of 20%

Soft start equipment l.jpgSlide 136

Soft start equipment

  • can enable switch off strategies to work

  • gives a more controlled motor start

    • by ramping up motor voltage

    • replaces DOL or star-delta starters

  • reduces power surge

  • reduces mechanical wear on motor, drive and connected equipment

  • makes it possible to stop and start motors more frequently

Motor voltage controllers l.jpgSlide 137

Motor Voltage Controllers

  • improve efficiency at loads below 50%

    • regulate the voltage at the motor terminals

    • iron losses are reduced

    • efficiency and power factor are improved

  • suitable for variable load motors that operate under 50% load for long periods

  • do not use on highly loaded motors

    • reduce efficiency at high load!

Variable speed drives l.jpgSlide 138

Variable Speed Drives

  • excellent “new” technology to help reduce electricity consumption

  • for pumps / fans savings can be dramatic

    • cubic relationship between power and flow

    • reduce flow to 80%, reduce power to 50%

  • not applicable to all motors

    • e.g. difficult for refrigeration compressors

Advantages of vsd l.jpgSlide 139

Advantages of VSD

  • many loads run at fixed speed, but user requirement is varying

    • e.g. pumps and fans

  • system often designed for worst case

    • then designer adds a safety margin

  • under average conditions flow too high

  • at fixed speed control is inefficient

    • e.g. dampers, flow bypass etc.

  • VSD can provide excellent savings

    • e.g. 80% flow at 50% power

Ways to vary the speed l.jpgSlide 140

Electro-mechanical variable speed systems

Electronic Variable Speed Drives (Inverters or VSDs)

Variable Speed Motors

Some savings, but losses in transmission systems

Good savings, efficiency maintained reasonably well

Better than an inverter, but a special motor

Ways to vary the speed

Electro mechanical drives l.jpgSlide 141

Electro-Mechanical Drives

  • Mechanical (V-belts & gears)

  • Hydraulic Couplings (Slippage between discs)

  • Eddy Current Couplings

Variable speed motors l.jpgSlide 142

Variable Speed Motors

  • Two speed AC Motors

  • AC 3-phase Commutator Motors

  • AC Switched Reluctance Motors

  • DC Motor & Drive Systems

Inverter vsds l.jpgSlide 143

Inverter VSDs

  • can be applied to most existing 3 phase motors

  • AC current is rectified into DC and then “inverted” back to AC at any desired frequency

  • motor speed proportional to frequency

    • speed can go from ~10% to ~120%

    • speed range depends on motor design and load requirements

Getting the savings wrong l.jpgSlide 144

Getting the savings wrong

  • Some consultants, salesmen and suppliers assume that the cube law always applies

  • IT DOESN’T apply, if

    • the variable speed is set to maintain a constant pressure at the pump or fan discharge

    • if a liquid is being pumped up to a tank at higher level (called “static head”)

Estimating vsd savings properly l.jpgSlide 145

Estimating VSD savings properly

  • See Good Practice Guide 249, Appendix 3

  • You will need

    • An understanding of the static head of your system

    • A good picture of the flow requirements of your system

    • The fan/pump curves from the manufacturer

    • The motor and VSD efficiency curves from the manufacturer

Achieving the maximum saving l.jpgSlide 146

Control point A

Control point B

Achieving the maximum saving

Fan feeding large ductwork system

Achieving the maximum saving147 l.jpgSlide 147

Control point A

Control point B

Achieving the maximum saving

At control point A, the pressure cannot change, so the new power will be in simple proportion to the flow:

Reduced power = old power x (new flow/old flow)

Achieving the maximum saving148 l.jpgSlide 148

Control point A

Control point B

Achieving the maximum saving

At control point B, the pressure through most of the system can change as friction reduces, so the new power will follow the cube law:

Reduced power = old power x (new flow/old flow)3

Typical invertor costs l.jpgSlide 151

Typical invertor costs

Case study variable speed drive townsend hook paper l.jpgSlide 152

Case Study - Variable Speed DriveTownsend Hook - Paper

  • Fan Drives

  • 3x45kW fan motors

    • damper controlled and drawing 30kW

  • £15,750 to install inverters on 3 motors

  • Savings 20kW/motor or £13,500/annum

  • Simple payback 14 months

Case study variable speed drive townsend hook paper153 l.jpgSlide 153

Case Study - Variable Speed DriveTownsend Hook - Paper

  • Pump Drives

  • Two pump motors, 1x75kW and 1x37.5kW

  • £12,500 to install inverters on both motors

  • Savings 74kW or £16,650/annum

  • Simple payback 9 months

Summary154 l.jpgSlide 154

Summary

  • most electricity consumed via electric motors

  • HEMs should always be selected

  • motor rewinds can introduce losses

  • motor switch off strategies should be adopted where possible

  • VSDs can improve control significantly

Top tips155 l.jpgSlide 155

Top Tips

  • Look for large motors with long running hours

  • Big motors >20 kW

  • Variable flow (fans and pumps)

  • Inventory listing

  • HEM policy

Insulation156 l.jpgSlide 156

Insulation

Where to insulate l.jpgSlide 157

Where to Insulate

  • Generally any hot surface above 60 ºC and any cold surface less than 5 ºC

  • Types of insulation

    • Mineral fibres (bonded or loose)

    • Polyurethane

    • polystyrene

Estimating heat losses q r l.jpgSlide 158

Estimating Heat Losses (Qr)

Radiation Qr = CE(T4s –T4a) W/m2

C= 5.67x10-8

E = emissivity (0.1 – 0.9)

T = K (ºC +273)

Estimating heat losses q c l.jpgSlide 159

Estimating Heat Losses (Qc)

Radiation Qc = C(T1 –T2)1.25 W/m2

C= 2.56 upward horizontal hot or down horizontal cold

= 1.97 flat vertical surfaces at least 0.5 m high

= 1.32 downward facing hot

= 2.3 horizontal cylinders greater than 150mm diam

Use a factor of V0.8 to allow for forced convection

Heat loss from open tanks l.jpgSlide 160

Heat loss from open tanks

  • Can be very large at high temperatures

  • Typical areas – metal treatment vats, hot wells

  • Losses can be reduced by ~80% with lids and insulation balls

Process integration l.jpgSlide 161

Process Integration

Process integration162 l.jpgSlide 162

Process Integration

  • Commonly used technique in the chemical industry to optimise heat recovery between hot and cold streams

  • Complex process but worthwhile quantifying fluid heating and cooling streams

Heat sinks l.jpgSlide 163

Heat sinks

Heat sources l.jpgSlide 164

Heat sources

Slide165 l.jpgSlide 165

Identify where Energy is Used and Develop an Action Plan

Survey

Senior Management Commitment

Measure Energy Consumption and Production

Review Performance and Action Plan

Develop Targets

Implement Energy Saving Measures

Produce Reports to Monitor Energy Use Against Output

Headline numbers update l.jpgSlide 166

Headline Numbers Update

Total Energy Cost Year to May 2003 $5.2 million

Utility management l.jpgSlide 168

Utility Management

  • In 2001, utility consumption data was very poor

  • Metering is now excellent

  • The only significant gap is the RTO

  • Environmental drivers are more powerful

  • Montage, Powerlogic and ORCI all provide excellent data

Priority areas l.jpgSlide 169

Priority Areas

  • Compressed air

  • Chillers

  • RTO

  • Colour Line

Air compressors l.jpgSlide 170

Air compressors

  • Well metered

  • Annual energy consumption is 5.3 million kWh/year ($480,000)

  • Centacs now meet all demand

  • One machine is shutdown at weekends

  • Manual control

Slide173 l.jpgSlide 173

$1400/day

$700/day

Slide174 l.jpgSlide 174

$1400/day

$970/day

Air Compressors Hourly Electricity Use

Scope for savings l.jpgSlide 175

Scope for Savings

  • Run a Centac and the Broomwade - estimated saving $150,000/year

  • Just run the Broomwade at night and weekends estimated saving $30,000

  • When Prime Line restarts investigate a heat regenerated drier

Chillers l.jpgSlide 176

Chillers

  • Chillers, pumps and CTs consume 6 million kWh/year ($550,000)

  • 1 chiller in the winter and 2 in the summer

  • System is oversized and inflexible

  • In the winter cooling load from ASH is 74kW (+90kW from old compressors) actual cooling is 750kW and compressor power is 350kW i.e. effective COP of 0.4

Slide177 l.jpgSlide 177

Chillers – Daily Elec. Use and Average Temperature

Slide178 l.jpgSlide 178

3 Pumps

4 Pumps

2 Pumps

5 Pumps

6 Pumps

Chillers potential savings l.jpgSlide 180

Chillers Potential Savings

  • In the summer one chiller is switched off at weekend

  • Corresponding pumps are not always switched off – potential saving 60,000 kWh/year ($5,400)

  • Can a chiller be switched off at night in the summer 3hrs@50 days – potential savings 60,000 kWh/year ($5,400)

  • VFD for glycol pumps

  • Small chiller for winter

Slide181 l.jpgSlide 181

RTO

  • Meter has not yet been configured

  • Estimated gas use $1.4 million/year

  • Electricity use of RTO fan 1.6 million kWh/year ($140,000)

  • Control of flow and LEL to the RTO is essentially manual

Slide182 l.jpgSlide 182

Hourly Gas Use

Rto savings potential l.jpgSlide 183

RTO Savings Potential

  • Weekend setting for night non productive time estimated saving 280,000 m³/year ($90,000) for gas and 50,000 kWh/year ($4,500) for electricity

  • Optimization of LEL set points (and air flows) Saving ?$100,000/year

Colour line l.jpgSlide 184

Colour Line

  • Is comprehensively metered

  • Total gas cost is $400,000/year

  • Total electricity is $600,000/year

  • Is well controlled

Slide187 l.jpgSlide 187

Colour Line Hourly Gas Use

Slide188 l.jpgSlide 188

Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon

Colour Line Hourly Electricity Use

kW

Colour line gas savings potential l.jpgSlide 189

Colour Line Gas Savings Potential

  • Appears well controlled

  • Improving shut down and start up procedure would save $3-4000/year for gas and $6,000 for electricity

Potential savings190 l.jpgSlide 190

Potential Savings

Other significant areas are lighting and space heating

Conclusions l.jpgSlide 191

Conclusions

  • Level of data is very impressive

  • Major gaps are:

    • RTO

    • Main site gas meter

    • Correlate chiller performance to ambient conditions and/or COP

  • Next step is to analyse and act upon the data


Copyright © 2014 SlideServe. All rights reserved | Powered By DigitalOfficePro