gri nw and implementation
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
GRI NW and Implementation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

GRI NW and Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 98 Views
  • Uploaded on

GRI NW and Implementation. David Halldearn Energy Market Insights Limited [email protected] 5 July 2010. Background. NMa identified need to update the Roadmap following adoption of 3 rd package

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' GRI NW and Implementation' - rolf


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
gri nw and implementation

GRI NW and Implementation

David Halldearn

Energy Market Insights Limited

[email protected]

5 July 2010

background
Background
  • NMa identified need to update the Roadmap following adoption of 3rd package
  • Review identified new role for GRI NW in co-ordinating implementation of 3rd package measures (notably Framework Guideline policies and network codes)
  • Current project is to specify how GRI NW can take implementation work forwards operationally
  • The proposals are for discussion!
objectives
Objectives
  • Improve the regulatory implementation process and of decision making by ministries on implementation
  • Enhance monitoring and enforcement by NRAs where there are cross border aspects
  • Assist ACER in undertaking its regional co-ordination functions
principles
Principles
  • GRI NW co-ordinates NRA decisions in the region – it does not take decisions itself
  • Implementation work undertaken by GRI NW must be complementary to the work of ACER
  • The work of GRI NW must take account of possible binding guidelines under the 3rd package on NRA co-operation; and of the possibility of binding decisions following dispute resolution by ACER should NRAs disagree
  • The forward work plan of GRI NW on implementation must take account of the 3 year work plan published by the Commission
  • Co-ordination should enable more efficient use of regulatory resources
scope of gri nw work on implementation
Scope of GRI NW work on implementation
  • Core co-ordination work:
    • national implementation by NRAs of European requirements
    • monitoring activities required of NRAs where there is a cross border interaction
    • enforcement action by an NRA where there is a cross-border aspect to the case
    • regulatory assessment of the regional TYNDP
  • Possible additional co-ordination work:
    • Interaction between NRAs and member states
    • regulatory supervision of the implementation work by TSOs
roles and responsibilities
Roles and responsibilities
  • Member states: formal responsibility for member state compliance
  • NRAs: Detailed aspects on implementation (although scope varies) and for monitoring and enforcement
  • TSOs: practical implementation
  • Stakeholders: -are the customers!
possible governance
Possible Governance
  • 2 options: ‘shallow’ and ‘deep’
  • Each has different attributes and implies a different level of co-ordination of regulatory decisions
  • Shallow model assumes voluntary co-operation as now
  • Deep model assumes formal arrangements exist for co-ordination of regulatory decisions
shallow model
Shallow model

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • No change
  • No legal barriers
  • No additional formal governance needed
  • Low prospects of delivering regulatory co-ordination on implementation
  • May encourage Agency to propose guidelines to bind NRAs in co-operation
  • Would not provide a sound basis for co-operation between NRAs on cross-border monitoring and enforcement
deep model
Deep model

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Potentially sound basis for NRA co-ordination on implementation, monitoring and enforcement
  • Formality could integrate GRI NW as recognised (but not formal) part of wider 3rd package institutional structure
  • Would reinforce shift to compulsory rather than voluntary
  • A formalised arrangement could be difficult to reach agreement on
  • Any arrangements must not be bureaucratic
governance implications of deep model
Governance implications of deep model
  • RCC remit to be formalised based on enhanced agreement
  • Role of member states to be recognised
  • Operational arrangements to be developed
  • Role of other GRI NW structures to be refined
  • Processes for interaction with ACER to be developed
next steps
Next Steps
  • Proposals to be revised following RCC discussion
  • Procedural aspects to be developed
  • Discussions to be held with other involved organisations
thank you
Thank you

David Halldearn

Energy Market Insights Limited

[email protected]

5 July 2010

ad