WP7 Integrated Transition Strategies

1. WP7IntegratedTransition Strategies TURASExternal ReviewBrussels 24 July 2013

2. ITS Context Setting : Architecture and urban-regional Planning : Spatial Planning and Development : Planning Theory and Methodology : WP Synergies, Project Synthesis : Integrated Planning, Knowledge Transfer : transition, urban, resilience, sustainability, integration • Professional Culture • Disciplinary Approach • Thematicalfocus • Explicit objectives • Implicitobjectives  Strategic objectives/keyterms  Planningstrategyon urban-regional scale

3. WP7 content & objectives task 7.1 7.2 7.3 milestones & deliverables • Trans. Strategy Workshop • Circulationof (city) ITS • Integrated Transition Report • Publicationof (city) ITS • Final Transition Guidelines objectives • prepare integrated transition approachfor combining the outcomes of one or more of the WP 2-6• framework / Matrix: problem definitions, data needed, actors etc.• methodology for integration • prepare integrated transition strategy (ITS) for each participating TURaScity• further aspects of urban resilience developed and tested in other TURaS cities• demonstration and assessment in terms of impact and transferability • prepare transferable final ITS framework / methodology for non-TURAS cities• modular structure based on TURaS outcomes• user-friendliness, accessibility … … 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Year 4 Year 5

4. WP7 content adaptation task 7.1 7.2 7.3 milestones & deliverables • Transition Strategy Workshop •Circulationof (city) ITS • Integrated Transition Report •Publicationof (city) ITS • Final Transition Guidelines milestones & deliverables • Transition Strategy Workshop • Circulationof (city) ITS • Integrated Transition Report • Publicationof (city) ITS • Final Transition Guidelines objectives Key steps ◦ WP 7 Risk Analysis 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 „black box“ • assess status and risks of WP7 within project • knowledge gaps vs. holistic approach• project terminology• capacities for WP7 (per partner / WP) • conceptualise “urban resilience” as a strategic objective for WP7 (planning)• resilience vs. sustainability• different sectorial conceptualisations vs. integration in “overall” urban strategy • operationalisability vs. uncertainty/complexity • conceptualise “transition strategy” in context of “urban resilience”• strategic planning vs. bottom-up & flexibility• transition management towards urban resilience ◦ Project Stakeholder Analysis 7.0 Year 1 ◦ Methodology for „common terminology“ ◦ Literature review & contributionto„urban resiliencetheory“ Year 2 ◦ Draftofintegrated (≙ urban)transitionstrategy ◦ Methodologyfor „integration“ Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

5. WP7 status & risk analysis WP7 working paper on website WP7 part of Project Periodic Report M1-18 • Topical (sectorial) selection vs.holistic (urban) overall project goal • Lack of „time framing“ of transitions aimed for in WP 2-6 • Very heterogeneous, wide & flexible use of „resilience“ through all WPs • Sectorial professional language vs. Common terminology • Lack of examples of operationalisable definitions/conceptualisations of „urban resilience“ (literature & practice) • Lack of indicators for/of resilience (literature & project‘s research capacity) • Tension between need/expectation for „ready-to-use“ working definitions and evolutionary bottom-up structure of project CapacityInventory in Excel • Uneven distribution of ressources

6. WP7 status & risk analysis WP 5 S L R WP4 WP3 D R WP2 LR WP6 S N SR source: EM Stumpp

7. Common Terminology Methodology – Key Terms to Glossary • Collection of potential key terms: Kick-off working sheets, DoW, SCMeetings • Pre-selection (and reduction) of key terms on people level: partner (individual) survey (questionnaire) TURAS Operational Vocabulary • Selection of key terms on WP level: WP leader survey (questionnaire) in collaboration with task leaders WP key terms • Collocation of working groups (lead by WPs) & allocation of key terms • Definition (& differentiation) of key terms: (interdisciplinary) dialogues Turas expert groups (Wiki) • Edition & publication for partners  TURAS Glossary(ready for public site)

8. Common Terminology WP7 keyterms on TURAS Wiki • Examplefor Wiki use • Conceptualframetosubstantiate & detailthetermsfor WP context • Open todiscussion

9. Conceptualising Urban Resilience • What means resilience in the disciplinary context of planning (vs. sustainability)? • What means URBAN resilience (versus e.g. ecological or psychological resilience)? • How can urban resilience be operationalised (integration, evaluation etc.)? • What means resilience in the disciplinary context of planning (vs. sustainability)? • What means URBAN resilience (versus e.g. ecological or psychological resilience)? • How can urban resilience be operationalised (integration, evaluation etc.)?

10. De-composing Urban Resilience

11. Framing Urban Resilience descriptive normative

12. Conceptualising Urban Resilience • What means resilience in the disciplinary context of planning (vs. sustainability)? • What means URBAN resilience (versus e.g. ecological or psychological resilience)? • How can urban resilience be operationalised (integration, evaluation etc.)?

13. ITS combined approaches

14. Strategic Integration Organisational Dimension • Level I-III • Content & Process • Scope: research Methodological Dimension • Level I-III (-IV) • Content & Process • Scope: strategicplanning

15. Strategic Integration Organisational Dimension • Integration I-III • Evaluation

16. Strategic Integration Methodological Dimension • TURAS Core Elements • Stakeholder groups  • Integration I • Integration II: • Context for decision making • Mechanism for coordination • Mechanism for delivery • Mechanism for control • Integration III: Navigation • Integration IV: Dissemination Methodological Dimension • TURAS Core Elements • Stakeholder groups  • Integration I • Integration II: • Context for decision making • Mechanism for coordination • Mechanism for delivery • Mechanism for control • Integration III: Navigation • Integration IV: Dissemination Methodological Dimension • TURAS Core Elements • Stakeholder groups  • Integration I • Integration II: • Context for decision making • Mechanism for coordination • Mechanism for delivery • Mechanism for control • Integration III: Navigation • Integration IV: Dissemination Methodological Dimension • TURAS Core Elements • Stakeholder groups  • Integration I • Integration II: • Context for decision making • Mechanism for coordination • Mechanism for delivery • Mechanism for control • Integration III: Navigation • Integration IV: Dissemination Methodological Dimension • TURAS Core Elements • Stakeholder groups  • Integration I • Integration II: • Context for decision making • Mechanism for coordination • Mechanism for delivery • Mechanism for control • Integration III: Navigation • Integration IV: Dissemination

17. Outlook • Evaluation of key term survey(part I - individual level) • Distribution of WP leader questionnaire(including key term survey part II) • Publication of „contribution to resilience theory“ • Furthering the „integrated (≙ urban) transition strategy approach“:draft of academic paper for discussion • Preparation of WP7 Kick-Off for local authorities / urban regionsat annual meeting (Nov, Rome)