1 / 21

Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR

Blois 2008. Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR. Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung University and Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle astrophysics, National Taiwan University. Work done with F.-Y. Chang (KIPAC/Stanford & NCTU), P. Chen (KIPAC/Stanford & NTU)

rodney
Download Presentation

Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Blois 2008 Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung University and Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle astrophysics, National Taiwan University

  2. Work done with F.-Y. Chang (KIPAC/Stanford & NCTU), P. Chen (KIPAC/Stanford & NTU) K. Reil (KIPAC/Stanford) and R. Sydora (U. of Alberta) axXi:v: 0709.1177 (astro-ph)

  3. Cosmic Ray Spectrum 12 decades of energies Galactic—Extragalactic Transition ~1018 eV Galactic origin Extragalactic origin?

  4. A closer look at ultrahigh energy

  5. Source flux E-γ Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cutoff Look for viable acceleration mechanisms Alan Watson at ICRC2007

  6. Cosmic Particle Acceleration Models • Conventional models • Fermi Acceleration (1949) (= stochastic accel. bouncing off magnetic domains) • Diffusive Shock Acceleration (1970s) (a variant of Fermi mechanism) ( Krymsky, Axford et al, Bell, Blandford&Ostriker) • Limited by the shock size, acceleration time, synchrotron radiation losses, etc. • Examples of new ideas • Unipolar InductionAcceleration (R. Blandford, astro-ph/9906026, June 1999) • Plasma Wakefield Acceleration (Chen, Tajima, Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 , 161101 (2002)) • Many others We shall focus on the plasma wakefield acceleration

  7. plasma wakefield acceleration • Idea originated by Chen, Tajima and Takahashi in 2002 • Plasma wakefield generated in relativistic astrophysical outflows. • Good features of plasma wake field acceleration: • —The energy gain per unit distance does not depend (inversely) on • the particle's instantaneous energy. • —The acceleration is linear. • The resulting spectral index • Stochastic encounters of accelerating-decelerating phase • results in the power-law spectrum: f(E) ~ E-2. • Energy loss (not coupled to the acceleration process) steepens the energy spectrum to f(E) ~ E-(2+β).

  8. B Three Ways of Driving Plasma Wakefield • Laser Plasma Wakefield Accelerator (LPWA) • A Single short laser pulse • T. Tajima and J. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1979) • Plasma Wakefield Accelerator (PWFA) • A High energy electron bunch • P. Chen, et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. (1985) But high intensity lasers or e-beams may be hard to find in astrophysical settings • Magnetowave Plasma Wakefield Accelerator (MPWA) • Asingle short magneto-pulse in magnetized plasma • P. Chen, T. Tajima, Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002) A magneto-pulse can be excited in a magnetized plasma  more relevant to astrophysical application

  9. + – right-handed , – + left-handed Waves in Magnetized Plasma • If k║B, the dispersion relation of wave in magnetized plasma pi ,pe : plasma frequency for ion& e- ci,ce :cyclotron frequency for ion & e- and 4 possible modes exist We call the branches below the light curve (=kc) “Magneto-waves” because of their phase velocities are lower than the speed of light. E/B = vph/c <1 One can always find a reference frame where the wave has only B component. ω=kc ω=kc

  10. Whistler Mode Dispersion Relation v.s. Magnetic Field B We aim for the large B case. As B increases, the relation approaches to a linear curve and the slope is closed to c. The range of k in simulation

  11. Take k and B to be along +z direction, the whistler wave packet induces the ponderomotive force Perpendicular to k and B Amplitude of whistler pulse This leads to the plasma wakefield Simulation results whistler pulse plasma wakefield

  12. a0 <<1 linear a0 >>1 nonlinear if Acceleration Gradient Maximum wakefield (Acceleration Gradient G) excited by whistler wave in magnetized plasma is χ~O(1): Form factor of pulse shape Vg ~ c where Verified for a0 <<1 by simulation Cold wavebreaking limit Lorentz-invariant normalized vector potential “strength parameter” The wakefield acceleration is efficient only when p <  < c

  13. Applications to UHECR acceleration • The astrophysical environment is extremely nonlinear, while our simulations are performed in the linear regime • In view of successful validation of linear regime, we have confidence to extend the theory to the nonlinear regime.

  14. Extension to a0>>1 is done analytically Varying Ew while fixing kand  The dependence of G on the strength parameter a0 verified! Arbitrary unit G a0 for a0>>1 G Fitted curve Numerical result Strength parameter a0=eEw/mc

  15. θ Acceleration in GRB Assume NS-NS merger as short burst GRB progenitor, where trains of magneto-pulses were excited along with the out-burst Typical neutron star radius ~ 10 km Surface magnetic field B ~ 1013 G Jet opening angle θ ~ 0.1 Total luminosity L~ 1050 erg/s Initial plasma density n0~1026 cm-3 R Wakefield excitation most effective when p~~c. Where is the sweet spot (choose c/p=6)? Due to the conservation of magnetic flux, B decreases as 1/r2. The plasma density also decrease as 1/r2. Therefore while Location for the sweet spot: R ~ 50 RNS ~500 km

  16. Whistler Mode Dispersion Relation v.s. Magnetic Field B We aim for the large B case. As B increases, the relation approaches to a linear curve and the slope is closed to c. The range of k in simulation

  17. The acceleration gradient at the sweet spot R Rs~10km R~ 50 Rs~ 500km θ~0.1 *Just need 100 km to accelerate particle to 1020 eV provided 10-4!

  18. Does acceleration gradient really depend on surface B field and plasma density?  R Rns=10 km θ~0.1 

  19. Let us take the range of the sweet spot of order 0.1R. Then, within the 0.1R range, a proton can be accelerated to the energy  Attainable energy 1020 eV for 10-4 No explicit dependence on magnetic field and plasma density!

  20. Acceleration in AGN Take nAGN  1010 cm-3, B104 G at the core of AGN L1046 erg/s ** is the fraction of total energy imparted into the magnetowave modes. ** Frequency of magnetowave in this case is in the radio wave region.  can be inferred from the observed AGN radio wave luminosity Acceleration distance for achieving 1021 eV is about 10 pc, much smaller than typical AGN jet size

  21. Summary • The plasma wakefield acceleration is a possible mechanism to explain the UHECR production. • Our simulations confirm, for the first time, the generation of the plasma wakefield by a whistler wave packet in a magnetized plasma. We have studied k||B case, simulation for a general angle is in progress. Simulations for production of whistler wave packet is also in progress. • When connecting it to relativistic GRB outflow, we suggest that super-GZK energy can be naturally produced by MPWA with a 1/E2 spectrum. • Same mechanism is also applicable to AGN

More Related