1 / 18

Full Economic Costing and Pricing – Latest developments

Full Economic Costing and Pricing – Latest developments. John Newton - National Co-ordinator for Costing and Pricing JCPSG. JCPSG. What is fEC?. TRAC methodology “The full economic cost of a project/activity incorporates all direct and indirect costs,

roddy
Download Presentation

Full Economic Costing and Pricing – Latest developments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Full Economic Costing and Pricing – Latest developments John Newton - National Co-ordinator for Costing and Pricing JCPSG

  2. JCPSG What is fEC? • TRAC methodology • “The full economic cost of a project/activity • incorporates all direct and indirect costs, • including the cost adjustments, required • under TRAC” (a definition) • Direct costs • Indirect costs • Cost adjustments- Infrastructure • - COCE Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  3. JCPSG Background • TR • TRAC • Investing in Innovation • Cross-Cutting Review of Science and • Research • CSR 2002 • Government expectations/commitment • JCPSG Strategy - cost/market-based pricing • DSR - new funding arrangements • OGDs/Treasury letter • HEFCE Financial Memorandum • Long-term strategy for science/CSR 2004 Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  4. Why is fEC important? JCPSG • Sustainability • “ An institution is being managed on a • sustainable basis if, taking one year with • another, it is recovering its full economic • costs across its activities as a whole, and is • investing in its infrastructure (physical, • human, and intellectual) at a rate adequate to • maintain its future productive capacity • appropriate to the needs of its strategic plan and students, sponsors and other customer requirements.”(Definition in TRAC Volume III) • Issues - fEC, strategic, pricing, project management/cost recovery, investment Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  5. TRAC requirements JCPSG • Definitions • Accounting/costing principles and • conventions • Time allocation - now every 3 years • Sampling • Cost drivers • T, R,O, S • PGRs • T, R, O /dept • R by research sponsor • Library/learning resources and estates • robust • Testing • Internal Audit • Audit Committee • Approval of figures - to Funding Councils Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  6. fEC requirements JCPSG • Estates - direct cost (by FTE or sq m) • 1650 hours • Indirect cost rate calculations - £/FTE • RC projects - time estimates, pay • bandings, monitoring, check on total RC • time, direct costs • QA process • Default indirect cost rates • Dispensations • Income reporting (January 2006) Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  7. fEC research project calculation JCPSG • Directly Incurred costs • Researcher salary costs - names, time (hours) • PGR salary costs - names, time • Technical/clerical salary costs • Direct non-staff costs, exc. Estates • Directly Allocated costs • PI/Co-investigators - names, time (hours) • Charges for lab. technicians • Directly allocated Estates costs (Inc. infrastructure adjustment) • Equipment • Indirect costs, inc. COCE adjustment • calculated for PI/researcher and PGR • FTEs • Exceptional items Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  8. fEC data requirements JCPSG • FTEs • Costing schedules for salary costs (note standard time), estates, charge-out rates for equipment, indirect cost rates/FTE • Verification of costs • Recording of actual costs • Recording of estimated costs and • matching with other records • Comparison • No double-charging • Indexation Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  9. Use of fEC JCPSG • Pre-award estimates • fEC for cost-based pricing • Funding of project • Difference – to be subsidised from other • income streams • Review of processes • Post-award reporting Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  10. Pricing publications JCPSG • Pricing toolkit (JCPSG) • Financial strategy in higher education institutions (HEFCE) • Developing a pricing strategy in higher education institutions (JCPSG) • OST guidance on the pricing of competitive and non-competitive contracts • OST guidance on the pricing of non-Research Council projects Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  11. JCPSG Pricing tips • Don’t disclose costs • Have clear pricing policy guidelines • Clarify ownership over IPR • Target appropriate markets • Be aware of market position and competition • Beware of Risk • Use Lambert Model Agreements • Negotiate for win-win Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  12. Implementation issues JCPSG • Control/systems processes • Project management • Cultural change • Communication • Resources • Performance measurement • Training • Planning for Sustainability Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  13. Future developments JCPSG • Funders Forum – Public Good Funding • Principles • Public sector acceptance – Treasury letter • Cost recovery on Framework Programmes • Eligible/ineligible costs - charities, EU, etc • HEFCE Review of Teaching • Shortfall on Research, European and • Public Good projects – use of QR or…? Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  14. Performance Indicators JCPSG • % of full economic costs recovered/project or activity. • This could also be stated by sub-category of activity (e.g. research sponsor, client, customer, etc) and category of activity (e.g. PFT, NPFT, PFR, NPFR, and O) • Contribution (being the difference between income and full economic cost) by project or activity, sub-category and category (as above) • Total of indirect costs recovered annually (which may be compared annually) • Total of estates costs recovered annually (which may be compared annually) • % of S time to time spent on T, R, O by department or school annually Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  15. Performance Indicators JCPSG • Surplus/deficit for major categories of activity (i.e., NPFT, PFR, NPFR, O) annually • % of surplus /deficit for major categories of activity to full economic costs annually • % of surplus/deficit for major categories of activity to income annually • % of surplus/deficit to COCE by category of activity annually • Review of backlog in investment in infrastructure annually • Success rate of bids to research sponsors and clients annually – to indicate competitiveness Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  16. Performance Indicators JCPSG • Number of customers/sponsors/clients for R and O • Income growth by category of activity annually • Comparison of forecast to actual of surplus/deficit by category of activity and surplus/deficit for competitor institutions year on year • Quality reviews of performance from customers, clients, students, sponsors – comparing trends Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  17. Strategic issues JCPSG • Shortfall on Research, European and • Public Good projects – use of QR or…? • Pricing implications - contribution/project, • negotiation. • Research strategy - portfolio, mix by • sponsor by dept Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

  18. Future JCPSG • JCPSG website - www.jcpsg.ac.uk • Self-help groups • BUFDG group • Sector bodies – AURIL,ARMA, etc Joint Costing and Pricing Steering Group

More Related