1 / 30

Jet Correlations from PHENIX: From Low-p T to High-p T

Jet Correlations from PHENIX: From Low-p T to High-p T. Many thanks to Paul Constantin, Wolf Holzmann, Jiangyong Jia, Jiamin Jin, and Hua Pei for work I’m showing. Also thanks to Brian Cole, Barbara Jacak, Craig Ogilvie, Paul Stankus, and Mike Tannenbaum for useful discussions.

rhood
Download Presentation

Jet Correlations from PHENIX: From Low-p T to High-p T

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jet Correlations from PHENIX: From Low-pT to High-pT • Many thanks to Paul Constantin, Wolf Holzmann, Jiangyong Jia, Jiamin Jin, and Hua Pei for work I’m showing. • Also thanks to Brian Cole, Barbara Jacak, Craig Ogilvie, Paul Stankus, and Mike Tannenbaum for useful discussions. Nathan Grau, Columbia University, Nevis Labs For the PHENIX Collaboration • Focus entirely on A+A collisions • High-trigger pT correlations • Can we do jet tomography? • What does theory tell us? • Low-trigger pT correlations • Away-side shape modification • RP dependence Correlations and Fluctuations

  2. nucl-ex/0507004 accepted nucl-ex/0510023 STAR PRL 91, 072304 (2003) Pedestal&flow subtracted • Moderate pT jets are suppressed • Lower pT jets are suppressed and broadened Jet Quenching • Single particle suppression pattern persists to 20 GeV Correlations and Fluctuations

  3. Df Total Elliptic flow C(Df) Hard scattering Resonance decays Df (rad) Constructing Jet Correlations Mixed events – corrects pair acceptance Sum over all events  jets measured on a statistical basis Correlations and Fluctuations

  4. High-pT Jet Correlations Correlations and Fluctuations

  5. Away-Side Jet in Au+Au! • C(Df) strength ~ S/B of jets • Red and blue lines are the uncertainty in v2 • Jets seen above the background for trigger >5 GeV/c and associated >2 GeV/c Correlations and Fluctuations

  6. Clear Away-Side in Cu+Cu! • Larger jet S/B in central Cu+Cu than central Au+Au • v2 modulation is smaller as well Correlations and Fluctuations

  7. h-h correlations in Au+Au Near-side unmodified Away-side yield is suppressed! PHENIX 8 < pT(trig) < 15 GeV/c Away-Side Yield Suppression nucl-ex/0604018 J. Jia Hard Probes 2006 Correlations and Fluctuations

  8. Black – scattering of parent partons Red – gluons from energy loss. Expected Broadening of Away-Side I. Vitev hep-ph/0501255 • Consequence of energy loss is broadening of the away-side correlations • multiple scattering of the parton • gluon radiation Correlations and Fluctuations

  9. 8 < pT(trig) < 15 GeV/c Lack of Away-Side Broadening! D. Magestro QM2005 Trigger 5-10 GeV/c Widths do not change between p+p and Au+Au?!? Correlations and Fluctuations

  10. Punch-through Events (I) T. Renk hep-ph/0602045 • Monte Carlo includes radial expansion reducing the effect of DE ~ L2 • Non-zero probability to lose no energy • Away-side only sensitive to none-zero energy loss? Production vertices of events with trigger > 8 GeV Red circles indicate an associated hadron (> 4 GeV) suffering no E-loss Correlations and Fluctuations

  11. Punch-through Events (II) • Yield suppression sensitive to the probability of punch-through Comparison of MC to STAR away-side yields. Correlations and Fluctuations

  12. Non-zero Probability for E-loss • Important quantitative question not answered by theorists: • ASW • qhat = 15 GeV/fm2 and L=2 • P(0) ~30-40%! • GLV • P(0) ~ 0%! • Can these data help constrain this result? Weidemann, Vitev Hard Probes 2006 Correlations and Fluctuations

  13. Lower pT Correlations • h-h Correlations in Au+Au (upper plots) • C(Df) strength ~ jet S/B • Few % S/B at lowest pT Correlations. • h-h Correlations with background subtracted (lower plots) Correlations and Fluctuations

  14. Cu+Cu @ 200 GeV Au+Au @ 62.4 GeV Different Colliding Systems and Energies Au+Au @ 200 GeV Correlations and Fluctuations

  15. assoc D trigg D assoc Parameterize the Away-Side Shape Could be a “bent” jet or a mach/ Cherenkov cone Parameterize the away-side shape as a double Gaussian that are offset symmetrically around Df = p by fit parameter D. Correlations and Fluctuations

  16. Physical Mechanism of the Away-Side Structure • Deflection due to flowing medium • Sensitive to jet + bulk interaction • hep-ph/0411341, Armesto, Salgado, Wiedemann • Shoulder position dependent on the RP orientation. • Cones • Mach cones • measure speed of sound • nucl-th/0406018 Stoecker, hep-ph/0503158 Muller, Ruppert, hep-ph/0411315 (2004) Casalderrey-Solana, Shuryak, Teaney • Cerenkov Cones • measure index of refraction • nucl-th/0507063 Koch, Majumder, Wang • Both would conclude shoulder position independent of RP orientation. • Distinguish by pT dependence to the shape. • Do we understand the root-s and system size evolution? Correlations and Fluctuations

  17. Au+Au Reaction Plane Dependence (I) Look at 4th bin since it has the smallest v2. Dip exists at most central before substraction! Correlations and Fluctuations

  18. Au+Au Reaction Plane Dependence (II) Know v2 depending on triggers RP orientation. J. Bielcikova et al, Phys. Rev. C69:021901, 2004 Correlations and Fluctuations

  19. Remnant jet Backsplash Mach Cones in From Theory • Mach shocks do not produce the two-particle correlation structure? • Hydro calculation of energy lost by jets U. Heinz HP2006 Correlations and Fluctuations

  20. H H H For the future: 3-Particle Correlations (I) • 3-particle correlations = 3 jet + 2 jetx1 thermal + 1 jetx2 thermal + 3 thermal. • Determining background is difficult • 3 jet correlation signal-to-background worse than 2 jet correlation signal-to-background • Looking for few % effect. Correlations and Fluctuations

  21. High pT (2.5<pT<4) p1 p2-a p3-a Correlation Variables : For the future: 3-Particle Correlations (II) • Study the 3-particle correlations in the “high-pT reference frame” • Project associated particles to perpendicular plane (1<pT<2.5) Correlations and Fluctuations

  22. θ* = 180 θ* = 180 θ* = 120 θ* = 120 θ* = 60 θ* = 60 v2 subtracted Correlation Function For the future: 3-Particle Correlations (III) PHENIX Preliminary 20-40 % Correlations and Fluctuations

  23. g Hadrons For the future: Direct g-h PRL 94 232301 (2005) • Direct photons not suppressed in the medium. • Much less “trigger bias” i.e. less biased toward skin emission • Photon measures jet energy  measured away-side D(z) modification Correlations and Fluctuations

  24. C(Df) C(Df) Df Df Inclusive g-h Correlations in Au+Au g: 5-10 GeV/c h: 1-2 GeV/c g: 5-10 GeV/c h: 3-5 GeV/c Comparison with p0 triggered data necessary to extract direct photon correlations. NB: a dip at p exists in the left CF after subtraction Correlations and Fluctuations

  25. PT Partner 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PT Trigger h± --- h± p0 --- h± C: 0-20% Summary of pT Evolution • The jet functions in Au+Au collisions evolve with both partner and trigger pT Away-side peak visible Away-side shoulders visible Neither visible Based on PHENIX preliminary and nucl-ex/0507004 P. Stankus CIPANP06 Correlations and Fluctuations

  26. Summary and Conclusions • High-pT triggered correlations show • Au+Au away-side not broadened • A suppressed away-side yield consistent with punch-through jets. • What is learned about the medium from this data? • Low-pT triggered correlations show a strongly modified away-side shape • independent of system size and collision energy • Independent of trigger orientation to the RP • What is learned about the medium from this data? • Still left to do with current data • Three particle correlations: Sorting out deflected, vs. mach/cerenkov • Further RP studies: Can we show DE ~ L2,L,Ln? • Direct g-h: D(z) modification Correlations and Fluctuations

  27. Backup Correlations and Fluctuations

  28. Comparison of g- and p0- Triggered Widths Near-side widths are consistent between g-triggered and p0-triggered. Dominant inclusive photon correlation is decay from jet fragments Correlations and Fluctuations

  29. PRL 94 232301 (2005) g-h Near Side Yields ~50% direct photons above 5 GeV/c in the most central. Also seen in g-triggered near side yield ratio to p0 -triggered yield. Correlations and Fluctuations

  30. For the future: RP-Dependence At Higher pT • Qualitatively: No hint of a volcano shape in any RP bin Correlations and Fluctuations

More Related