1 / 17

WisDOT Bureau of Technical Sevices Spring 2014 QMP Training

B ase Compaction SPV’s and Project Design Guidance. WisDOT Bureau of Technical Sevices Spring 2014 QMP Training. Outline. How’d we get here Project selection/design guidance SPV highlights Still to come. How’d We Get Here?. 2013 pilot projects IH-43 Ozaukee Co.

rhoda
Download Presentation

WisDOT Bureau of Technical Sevices Spring 2014 QMP Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Base Compaction SPV’sand Project Design Guidance WisDOT Bureau of Technical Sevices Spring 2014 QMP Training

  2. Outline How’d we get here Project selection/design guidance SPV highlights Still to come

  3. How’d We Get Here? • 2013 pilot projects • IH-43 Ozaukee Co. • USH 63 St. Croix Co. (x2) • STH 179 Crawford Co. • STH 29 Brown Co. • STH 153 Marathon Co. • Spec revisions • 1 ¼ – Inch BAD • Mill/Pulverize and Relay • STH 47 Vilas Co. • USH 51 Lincoln Co. • STH 73 Wood Co. • STH 29 Marathon Co. • Fishel Road Forest Co.

  4. ProjectSelection – BaseAgg. Dense • HMA surfaced mainline • AND QMP Subgrade and/or Subgrade improvement • AND 30,000 tons+ • Between 2010 and 2013 • 17% of all let projects • 31% of HMA projects • 54% of HMA projects with 1-1/4” base agg.

  5. Project Selection - Mill/Pulv.& Relay 5 • Minimum Mill and Relay or Pulverize and Relay Quantity of 40,000 SY • Between 2010 and 2013 • 3% of all let projects • 43% of pulverize and relay projects • 56% of mill and relay

  6. Special Provision – Highlights 6 • QC plan • IA requirements • Personnel requirements • 93% of target density • Test frequency • “Failing” test/corrective action • Measurement and payment

  7. QC Plan Requirements Organizational chart Communication process Source locations list (1 ¼” spec only) Stockpiling and hauling methods (1 ¼” spec only) Process control problem resolution process QC lab, sample, and documentation storage locations Estimate of locations and calculated quantities to be tested under this provision.

  8. Misc Requirements • Personnel • HTCP Nuclear Density Technician I • Or ACT certified technician • IA • According to the Department’s independent assurance program

  9. Target Density Determination • 1 ¼ - Inch Base Aggregate Dense • ≤20% Recycled Material • Modified Proctor Max Dry • >20% Recycled Material • Mod. Proctor Max Wet • Mod. Proctor Max Dry • Control Strip • Mill/Pulverize and Relay • Control Strip

  10. Test Frequency – QC/CA • 1 ¼ - Inch Base Aggregate Dense • Density – 1 per 1500 tons • Gradation – 1 per 3000 tons • Proctor – initial and then if trigger met • Mill/Pulverize and Relay • Density – 1 per 3000 tons • Proctor – initial and thenif trigger met • CA – Optional Information • Process control decisions • Troubleshooting • Limiting liability and/or corrective action limits

  11. QC/CA – Proctor Triggers • 1 ¼ - Inch Base Aggregate Dense • Gradation change > 10.0% • Source change • Recycle material blend change > 10.0% • Density > 103% on two consecutive measurements • If using control strips; thickness change > 2.0 inches • Mill/Pulverize and Relay • Layer thickness change > 2.0 inches • Density > 105% or <90.0%; AND outside of range of 10 avg control strip shots; on three consecutive measurements

  12. QV Frequencies • Density and gradations • 30% of Contractor Frequency • Target densities; • Same triggers as QC • Control Strips • QV person must be present and verify sufficient compactive effort (including addition of water) • Will use same value as contractor

  13. IA Highlights • Evaluate QV and QC sampling and testing • May include one or more of the following: • Split sample testing • Proficiency sample testing • Witnessing sampling and testing • Test equipment calibration checks • Additional sampling and testing

  14. Corrective Action

  15. Measurement and Payment 1 ¼ - Inch BAD; Tons Mill/Pulverize and Relay; SY Water; MGal

  16. Still To Come 16 • Facilities Development Manual guidance – March 2014 • Project selection guidance • Water bid item • 10 – 20 gallons per ton 1 ¼ - Inch BAD • 3 – 6 gallons per SY Mill/Pulverize and Relay • Revisions – Fall 2014 • Conversion to STSP – Spring 2015

  17. ftp://ftp.dot.wi.gov/dtsd/bts/pavement/Base_Comp_Docs 17 Questions Now or On Projects jed.peters@dot.wi.gov or (608)220-0690

More Related