1 / 8

Martha: a next generation testable language

World’s worst title. Martha: a next generation testable language. Not a “language” but support tools for “what else” queries. Tim Menzies West Virginia University tim@menzies.us. Problem. The unknown knowns Factors that have been modeled separately, but never studied in conjunction.

rfoote
Download Presentation

Martha: a next generation testable language

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. World’s worst title Martha: a next generationtestable language Not a “language” but support tools for “what else” queries Tim Menzies West Virginia Universitytim@menzies.us

  2. Problem • The unknown knowns • Factors that have been modeled separately, • but never studied in conjunction • Leveson: • common cause of software failure • components that are known to fine in isolation but failing when combined due to an unknown interaction. • Brian O’Conner: • Columbia incident- pre-launch foam-strike studies • Did not study a critical combination of factors

  3. Hypothesis The “enough” hypothesis: • Early in lifecycle we know enough to find enough problems. “Enough” : • models exist or can be created for enough of the components • operational constrains known • system goals understood. • goals can be converted into oracles • behavior can be sampled, fast enough The “funnel” hypothesis (a.k.a. “low hanging fruit”) • Within a system of decisions, there are a few “master” decision and many “slaves” • It is practical to find those master decisions Faster, better arguments: • Sample, learn, restrain • Address the master decisions first, • Makes the slave decisions superfluous Procedural encodings + range functions + memoing • More usable modeling langauge for most folks

  4. Not: “what is” a = f(b,c,d,…) Not: “what if”: For a few scenarios.. jiggle “b,c,d,…” see how “a” changes Rather: “what else” Memoed functions (with rollback) Hedges (fuzzy and-ors-nots) Not data types, but range functions Massive what-ifs (generates lots of output) An oracle scores each run A data miner: finds ranges of “b,c,d…” that select for poor scores Repeat till happy :-) Approach use hedges models contain use are range definitions functions are exercise monitored by restrains make simulations memos treatments scored-by Aha! used-by oracle learns data miner used-by

  5. Importance/ Benefits The trouble isn't what people don't know; it's what they do know that isn't so. -- Will Rogers My ideal computer never says “hello world”;rather, it says “hello, that’s strange”. -- Tim Menzies Q1: Cold causes o-ring incidents? A1: No, so launch Q2: Heat blocks o-ring incidents? A2: Yes, don’t launch

  6. Relevance To NASA • Increasing use by NASA: • Rapid development of mission concepts • E.g. • JPL’s TeamX • GSFC’s IMDC • How to audit TeamX or IMDC sessions? • How ensure that, in the heat of the moment, critical features of a mission are not over-looked? • Or worse, accidently over-written by other decisions?

  7. CHEM Accomplishments • Taught Martha to graduate students • “just a bunch of functions” • Case studies • FLEET: a fleet of autonomous agents • CHEM: chemical production facility • COST: software cost model • Tasks parameter, fault simulation, optimization, tuning, localization, diagnosis, configuration • CHEM • COST • FLEET • Lessons: • “treatments” support a wide range of tasks • Surprisingly fast learning of controllers • Automating a “principle-investigator-in-a-box” COST FLEET

  8. Next Steps • Better incremental data mining • 100 to 1000 times faster • Anytime algorithm • Smaller memory footprint • Better sampling policies • ??? Use internals of data miner to define what to try next • Release of a tool kit • More case studies • SMART (small ARRT) • TEAM-X • ECS support • with James Kiper, Miami Uni; and Leila Meshkat, JPL • Other offers?

More Related