1 / 14

Smartphones impact in 3G and Future LTE Networks

Smartphones impact in 3G and Future LTE Networks. Student : Adnan Basir (84906S) Supervisor : Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor : Timo Halonen (Nokia Siemens Networks ) Work carried out at Nokia Siemens Networks, Espoo. 17-March-2011. Aalto University, School of Electrical Engineering .

reya
Download Presentation

Smartphones impact in 3G and Future LTE Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Smartphones impact in 3G and Future LTE Networks Student : AdnanBasir (84906S) Supervisor : JyriHämäläinen Instructor : TimoHalonen (Nokia Siemens Networks ) Work carried out at Nokia Siemens Networks, Espoo 17-March-2011 Aalto University, School of Electrical Engineering

  2. Table of Contents • Introduction /Background • Reason for Smartphone Signaling Congestion • Problem statement • Layer 3 Radio Resource Control (RRC) Cell states. • Method Used • Important Results • Signaling Congestion in LTE • Conclusion and Future Work

  3. Introduction • What is smartphone ? • A device that has ability to browse internet, send/receive email, edit office tasks etc, in addition to make regular phone calls. • What is Smartphone Signaling Challenge ? • Huge Influx of smartphones to the market • Congestion in cellular networks • Failed call attempts • High congestion report in newyork (AT&T case) and london • Is increase in data usage the real problem ? • High data usage is only among small group of subscribers but congestion is in entire network.

  4. Why Congestion then ! • Signaling Traffic is the culprit . • 30 – 50 % higher now as compared to data traffic. • Applications in smartphones connect to internet even when users are no using them (i.e. facebook updates, tweets etc). • Keep-alive messages • 3G networks were designed to handle huge data traffic but not signaling traffic ! • With influx of tablet devices the problem is going to get worse

  5. RRC Cell states • What is signaling message ? • Each time a mobile make state transition it generates signaling messages. • 30 messages to go between idle and dch • 7 messages between dch and pch • 2 messages between pch and fach • Some mobile vendors implement Fast dormancy which is transition from DCH to IDLE state when there is no data.

  6. Thesis objective • Observe impact of various smartphones applications on network in terms of resource management. • Best network parameters for optimized services • T1, T2, T3 timers etc • To study How LTE cope with signaling congestion problem.

  7. Method Used • 3G Test Network • 3G RRC logs with EMIL Tool (NSN propriety) • Wireshark for traces from 3G Gn Interface • NSN NETACT to configure network parameters • Nemo Handy (Used in case of outdoor map studies)

  8. Important Results • Online Gaming • 30 minutes game play • A single voice call would result in estimated 50 signaling messages. • Android uses “Fast dormancy” which results in high number of signaling messages TOTAL STATE TRANSITIONS TOTAL SIGNALING MESSAGES(Respective to state transitions) 3201 1996 345 97 G Android IPhone 4.1

  9. 3201 Total Signaling Messages = 3201 ! Android uses fast dormancy and forces the UE to idle state when there is no data ! STATE TRANSITIONS SIGNALING MESSAGES(Respective to state transitions) 97 RABS DCH>FACH FACH>PCH PCH>FACH FACH>DCH SIGNALING IMPACT (TEXAS HOLDEM ON GOOGLE ANDROID) Total Signaling Messages = 1996 ! 936 930 STATE TRANSITIONS SIGNALING MESSAGES(Respective to state transitions) 155 156 36 28 66 18 14 2 RABS DCH>FACH FACH>PCH PCH>FACH FACH>DCH SIGNALING IMPACT (LIVE POKER ON IPHONE 4.1) Important Results 30 minutes game play !

  10. 24 Hour user profiling with N97 • In 24 Hour resources utilization estimate, idle, shoulder and busy cases have been divided as following • User remain idle for 14 hours in 24 hours • User perform shoulder activity for 7 hours in 24 hours. • User perform busy activity for 3 hours in 24 hours • For N97 mini, the results from 24 hour profile is given in the table

  11. Signaling Congestion in LTE • Simplified RRC Architecture • RRC Idle • Cell selection • Monitoring • RRC Connected • DRX in connected state • Only one reconfiguration message • No RNC • Simple RRC connection procedure. • No NBAP and ALCAP signaling • Only PS Domain • No signaling connection release procedure • MME Handling most of the load now • So there can more signaling congestion on core network side

  12. Other important studies • Impact of CELL_PCH • Laptop (with utms dongle) Vs Mobile signaling Load • Maps Studies (Google maps, Ovi maps) • Angry bird (Online Game) • MiFi study

  13. Conclusion / Future Work • Implement HSPA Release 7 Cell-Fach • HS-DSCH instead of FACH • High efficiency • Implement Cell-Pch • Avoid fast-dormancy • Femtocells • Load sharing (signaling/data) • Intelligent network monitoring • Application using more signaling resources • Charge users on application bases

  14. QUESTIONS ? THANK YOU !

More Related