1 / 42

CDMA/IP-based System for Interoperable Public Safety Radio Communications

CDMA/IP-based System for Interoperable Public Safety Radio Communications. Xin Wang Director: Wireless Networking and Systems Lab (WINS) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Stony Brook University www.ece.sunysb.edu/~xwang. Problems in Public Safety Systems.

reya
Download Presentation

CDMA/IP-based System for Interoperable Public Safety Radio Communications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CDMA/IP-based System for Interoperable Public Safety Radio Communications Xin Wang Director: Wireless Networking and Systems Lab (WINS) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Stony Brook University www.ece.sunysb.edu/~xwang

  2. Problems in Public Safety Systems • Two main factors limiting the reliability and availability of public safety systems: • Different agencies use incompatible systems (different frequencies, different modulation or encoding, etc). • Spectrum is limited and fragmented. • Problems of limited spectrum and incompatibility: • Can not interoperate • Cannot support wideband data and video communications • Real-time access to mug-shots, finger-prints, crime-scene • Fire-fighting, crowd- and prison control • Cannot share data among agencies

  3. Short-term Solutions • Use dispatching or switch center to manually relay signals betweens systems • Requirements • Interfaces to all potential systems • Coordination and involvement of all public safety agencies • Challenges • Scalability when allocating new frequency band • Proprietary nature of public safety system

  4. Long-term Solutions • Develop modular and scalable systems • Individual agencies can acquire and expand their own wireless systems without compromising compatibility • Cost offset: sharing the radio infrastructure from various agencies in a region • Use of more efficient radio technologies, especially for new frequency bands

  5. CDMA/IP-based Wireless Systems • CDMA • Easy of deployment, higher capacity, improved quality, greater coverage, increased privacy and talk time • IP interface between different systems • Allowing the interoperability of different bands • Sharing the networks independent of access techniques • Easy of supporting new radio bands and new IP-based technologies while supporting existing systems • Deployment of off-the-shelf and third-party products • Multimedia, location tracking, encryption, VPN

  6. IP Radio Access Network (IP RAN) Internet Performance &Services Multimedia & Messaging Server Content Location service Future Network Architecture Micro Base Station Wireless Gateways Cellular Base Station Bluetooth - Radio Hub - Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

  7. IP Radio Access Network (IP RAN) IP Radio Access Network (IP RAN) Internet A Sharing and Connection Structure Public Switched Telephone Network PDSN/SGSN PDSN/SGSN PAG (PSTN) (Packet Data Serving Node) (Packet Access Gateway) RNC RNC RNC (Radio Network Controller) BSm BS i Area 2 Area 1 BS j BS k

  8. Benefit of IP RAN • More scalable, reliable, and cost effectiv • Instead of linking individual agency to switching center through private or leased lines • Enable packet-based transportation • New applications • Statistical aggregation • High bandwidth utilization, reduced cost • Support both wire-line and wireless

  9. Requirements of Public Safety System • Round clock availability, secure and private communications • Quality of services (QoS) guarantee • Voice (low delay and jitter) • Data (high throughput) • Video (QoS and throughput) • Maximize resource usage under scarce spectrum • Efficient resource management while guaranteeing • Availability, emergency, QoS

  10. Challenges: Air Interface • Support transmission quality • Control power and rate to achieve target Eb/Io • Power and rate allocation for circuit-based transmission (e.g., multimedia) • Adapt rate of elastic data through scheduling • Admission control for guaranteeing quality of on-going transmissions • More efficient use of spectrum • Integrated support of various traffic • real-time circuit-based and elastic packet-based

  11. Challenges: IP-based Backhaul • Traffic in RAN is different from general Internet • Significant amount of traffic is delay sensitive • Voice, radio frames involved in soft handoff • Majority of handoffs involve RAN • Interruptions during hard handoffs • Delayed handoffs and resource wastage during soft handoffs • Reservation needs to be quick • Radio frame may contain both data and control • Loss and delay of control impact transmission, and reduce air interface capacity

  12. Proposed Work • Resource management for air interface • Scalable backhaul management Many interactions: Resource allocation across multiple network layers Effect of air interface management and user mobility on RNA Effect of resource management in RAN on the air interface • Multicasting support: group communications • Simulator design

  13. Resource Management for Air Interface • Goal • Serve both circuit-based delay sensitive applications and packet-based high speed data application • Support both user-to-user unicast and one-to-many multicast for group communications • Approaches: Cross-layer • Physical layer: power control, rate control • Link layer: scheduling • Network layer: admission control

  14. Rate Control • Basic rate control methods: • Fixed channel continuous transmission • Vary processing gain • Assigning multiple codes • Time-slotted scheduling • Allocate different number of time slots • Allocate different number of codes • Supporting connectivity and availability • Reduce video resolution, reduce rate of elastic data • Different tradeoffs • Combating the reduction of Eb/Io: throttling the source-coding rate or increasing the transmission power • Allowing for increasing bit error for less critical data • Apply more efficient error-resilient coding algorithms

  15. Power Control • Optimal power allocations: different types of traffic, different transmission formats • Power sharing among real-time and non real-time traffic • Fixed rate transmission: iterative power control to find the minimum power to guarantee the received quality • Increased power for real-time traffic (increased load, or bad channel) • Reduce power for elastic data traffic • Allocate more time slots to delay sensitive packet scheduled data

  16. Packet Scheduling • Support different QoS • Literature work only considers maximize total throughput, cannot meet public safety requirement • Study tradeoffs between time-slotted scheduling and fixed-channel continuous transmissions. Feature of scheduling: • Pros: More efficient resource usage and overall higher throughput, throughput gains from multi-user diversity • Cons: complex in guaranteeing quality • Adaptive scheduling • Increase data rate when system load is low

  17. Admission Control • Adaptive admission control for integrated traffic • Consider both circuit and packet transmissions • Cannot guarantee quality by purely scheduling • Different power for different users • Varying power for the same user due to varying channel conditions and traffic rate • Prioritize handoffs • Consider both soft handoff and hard handoff • Study connection level performance

  18. Backhaul Resource Management • Effective and scalable traffic engineering • Efficient handoffs

  19. Scalable Traffic Engineering • Aggregate resource reservation and traffic multiplexing • Reservation at cell level instead of at mobile level • Minimize traffic dynamics • Reduce management overhead • Sink-tree based aggregation at upper link • Multicasting at downlink • Ensure fairness: different cells, different agencies, different users

  20. Efficient Handoff Management • Handoff prediction and guard channel reservation • Dual time scale guard capacity control • More efficient than direct reservation • Prediction aggregation, fairness • Increase scalability • Blocked-based reservation • Packet rerouting and sequencing • Queuing at RNC or at base stations? • Load control and resource management at downlink • More effective diversity control to reduce error rate • Multicasting to speed up rerouting

  21. Multicasting Support • Public safety agencies require: talk or share information within a group of users • Exploit the broadcast feature of downlink channels • Multicasting for circuit-based transmission • Multicasting for time-slotted packet-based transmission

  22. Simulator Design • Build channel model • Simulate functions at air interface • Simulator functions in the backhaul • Simulated all the proposed functions, performance evaluations

  23. Work Completed

  24. Work Completed So far • Data Traffic Analysis • Preliminary simulator design

  25. Traffic Analysis in CDMA Network • Internet data traffic exhibits long range dependency compared to voice traffic • Typical data users: heavy tailed ON/OFF users, average file size 20KB (or 2.5seconds burst time with 64Kbps) –Long Range Dependent (LRD) • Typical voice users: exponential ON/OFF users, average burst time 70ms. • CDMA network performance needs to be evaluated and protocols need to be enhanced to accommodate data traffic.

  26. LRD Impact in CDMA Networks • LRD Impact on • Multi-Access Interference (MAI) • Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR) • Outage Probability • Can be used for traffic prediction • Call Admission Control (CAC) • Rate Control

  27. Multi-access Interference • MAI: • Xj is user’s activity indicator: when user j is transmitting (ON), Xj=1; when user is silent (OFF), Xj=0. • Pj is power per sampling time. • with perfect power control, • Ki(u) is the equivalent number of active users transmitting with rate Ri

  28. Statistics of MAI • Distribution of MAI • Instantaneous MAI I(u) is the sum of multiple independent random variables and approximates Gaussian distribution with variance • Time-scaled MAI IT(t) is defined as is the number of samples in Twhich remains as Gaussian • Long range dependency of MAI • Voice users: ON/OFF periods are exponentially distributed, then I(u) is SRD. • Data users: ON/OFF periods are heavy tailed, then I(t) is LRD. • MAI has a Weibull bounded tail distribution: ST

  29. Instantaneous SINR • Instantaneous SINR • Distribution • SINR has the distribution with impact combining N0andKi • Long range dependency • Voice users • N0 and Ki are both SRD, N0+Ki -> SRD and SINR -> SRD. • Data users • N0 is SRD and Ki is LRD, N0+Ki -> LRD and SINR -> LRD

  30. Time-scaled SINR • Time-scaled SINR: average over a time window • Noise N0T has a Gaussian distribution with variance • KiT also follows a Gaussian distribution • Voice users: variance decreases fast with T • Data users: variance decreases slow with T as H>0.5 • SINR has a “Gaussian like”distribution which is the reverse of WN0T/Pi +KiT (Gaussian distribution)

  31. Outage Probability • Outage probability • The probability that the average SINR or time scaled SINR in a packet transmitting time is smaller than a threshold  degraded quality • Also decay slow.

  32. Prediction in CDMA Networks • Active users K prediction • Predict K in the next window Tm based on historical values • Fixed Period (FP) vs. Variable Period (VP) prediction • Prediction is useful for • Rate control: in a relatively small T • Call admission control: in a relatively large T FP vs VP

  33. Fixed Period Prediction vs. Variable Period Prediction • Fixed Period Prediction: (existing, simple) • Predict the next value based on the average value in pervious m windows. • Only count a finite number of historical values • Historical values are added to prediction with the same weights. • Variable Period Prediction (more accurate) • Predict the next value based on all previously measured values with proper weights • All historical values are added to the prediction • Multi time-scale prediction • Historical values are properly weighted in the prediction • Recursive algorithm, consumes less memory

  34. Rate Control • Adjust user’s sending rate based on active user K prediction in a relatively smaller window T (2-10sec.) • Suppose the system can support at most Km (equivalent) active users (transmitting at maximum rate Rm), adjust user’s sending rate according to prediction: • If , increase each user’s rate with • If , decrease each user’s rate with

  35. Call Admission Control • Admit new users based on prediction of network performance in a relatively large T (e.g., 5min). • CAC for voice users • Based on average performance • The users that the network can admit is at most is the activity indicator • CAC for data users • Based on number of active users predicted in the next period • If , then admit, otherwise reject.

  36. User Throughput Throughput: Rate Control CAC

  37. Conclusion for Traffic Analysis • Both MAI and SINR are LRD in a CDMA network with heavy tailed ON/OFF data users • Strong auto-correlation in MAI and SINR could be used for prediction in rate control and CAC • Variable period prediction scheme is proposed and proved to be better than the existing fixed period prediction in terms of • More accurate • Consumes less memory • Achieves better performance in rate control and CAC

  38. Basic Simulator Design • Language: ANSI C++ • The network topology • Approximated as a square mesh. • Event Generator (Most important is handoff event) • Call arrival and departure are generated used Poisson distribution • Handoff events are triggered on the basis of power measurements. • Event queue and scheduling: tree-based • Need more efficient event scheduler

  39. Simulator (cont’d) • Mobility model • Random Way Point • Power Measurement • Calculated based on mobile location • Channel Model • Fading, shadowing, path loss, interference • Network Model: • Mobile object, cell object • UMCast: major network functions with references • ALL mobile objects • ALL Cell objects • Stat class • Challenges: • How to run event generator and algorithm in parallel • Trade off scalability and event granularity

  40. Basic Functions in Simulator • Call initiation • Call arrival • Call departure • Power measurement • Handoff prediction • Guard capacity management • Admission control • Performance statistics

  41. On-going Work • Multicasting support for downlink circuit based transmissions (support of multimedia such as voice and video for group communications) • How to address heterogeneous requirements of users • How to transmit to different terminals? • How to guarantee quality for users with different channel conditions? • How to guarantee multicast traffic quality? • How to guarantee un-interrupted communications for each talk group? • How to tradeoff multicast and unicast transmissions? • Admission control for integrated circuit-based continuous media transmission and slotted-packet-based data • How to formulate resource consumption model? • How to interact with rate control and power control?

  42. Future Work • The remaining of the proposal

More Related