1 / 22

A Comparison of Emotional Expression between Canadian-born and Immigrants Living in Canada

A Comparison of Emotional Expression between Canadian-born and Immigrants Living in Canada. S. Safdar, L.C. Gough, R. Raiciu, & J. Rendell University of Guelph, Canada Paper presented at the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology Spetses, Greece, July 10, 2006.

rey
Download Presentation

A Comparison of Emotional Expression between Canadian-born and Immigrants Living in Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Comparison of Emotional Expression between Canadian-born and Immigrants Living in Canada S. Safdar, L.C. Gough, R. Raiciu, & J. Rendell University of Guelph, Canada Paper presented at the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology Spetses, Greece, July 10, 2006

  2. Purpose of the Study • The purpose of the study was to examine similarity/differences of emotional display rules in samples of adults and students. • The study also aimed at examining similarity/differences of emotional display rules in samples of Canadian born and Immigrants.

  3. Hypotheses • Hypothesis 1: • No difference between Canadian students and adults in relation to expression of emotions were predicted. • Hypothesis 2: • Canadian samples (students and adults) express their emotions (i.e. happiness, surprise, anger, contempt, fear, sadness and disgust) more than the immigrant sample. • Canadians will report that it is more acceptable to express positive emotions more overtly with family, friends, and casual acquaintances than negative emotions.

  4. Sample 1: Canadian-Born Students • 124 Canadian-born university students • 63(51%)=females 60 (48%)=males • Age M=19, SD=1.46 • 96% single • Religion: 33% Catholic, 35% Christian • Economic background: 48% high middle income, 27% middle income

  5. Sample 2: Immigrant Students • 104 Immigrant university students • 64(62%)=females 40 (38%)=males • Age M=20, SD=2.91 • 89% married • Religion: 27% Christian, 25% Buddhist, 24% Muslim • Place of Birth: 15% India, 8% Pakistan, 7% Philippines • Native Language: 39% Romanian, Chinese 7% • Economic background: 43% middle income, 32% high middle income

  6. Sample 3: Canadian-Born Adults • 94 Canadian-born adults • 66(70%)=females 28 (30%)=males • Age M=50, SD=9.88 • 76% married, 13% separated/divorced • Religion: 12% Catholic, 60% Christian, 27% none • Economic background: 44% middle income, 20% high middle income, 19% low middle income • 90% had post secondary education

  7. Instruments • Display Rule Assessment Inventory-DRAI (21 questions) • Five possible behavioral responses: Express, Amplify, Deamplify, Neutralize, Mask, & Qualify • Two possible situations: public & private • Seven emotions: fear, sadness, contempt, disgust, happiness, surprise, & anger • Twenty one targets • Assessment of intensity and commitment to each of the target person in the DRAI scale (20-item)

  8. Scoring the DRAI • Data transformation • Parameters of HOMALS analysis were used: Amplify (.5651), Express (.3842), Qualify (-.1218), Demaplify (-.1545), Mask (-.3828), Neutralize (-.5338)

  9. Target Persons • A factor analysis with varimax rotation and eigenvalue resulted in three independent factors for each sample: family, friends, and acquaintances. The structure of these factors were different for each sample.

  10. Target Effect on Expression of Emotion • A four-way Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was conducted, with Category (3) as the between subject factor and Emotion (7), Target (3), and Context (2) as within-subjects variables. • A main effect for category was not found • F(2, 304)=2.34, p > .05 • Category * Target • Wilks Lambda=.64, F(4, 606)=38.32, p < .001, η2 = 0.20

  11. Category * Target

  12. Testing Hypothesis 1 • A significant effect for Emotion • Wilks Lambda=.20, F(6, 299)=195.58, p<.001, η2=.80 • A significant effect for Emotion*Category interaction • Wilks Lambda=.74, F(12, 598)=7.97, p<.001, η2=.14

  13. Marginal Means of 7-Emotions

  14. Testing Hypothesis 2 • Category * Target * Emotion • Wilks Lambda=.67, F(24, 586)=5.38, p < .001, η2 = 0.18

  15. Marginal Means: Family

  16. Marginal Means: Friends

  17. Marginal Means: Acquaintances

  18. Summary of Findings • The composition of family, friends, and acquaintances varies from student to adult samples and from Canadian to immigrant samples. • Students expressed their emotions more than adults with family, friends, and acquaintances. • Canadian students expressed their emotions with family and acquaintances more than immigrant students.

  19. Summary of Findings • In general, positive emotions (happiness & Surprise) are expressed more than negative emotions (anger, contempt, disgust, fear, & sadness). • Canadian-born Adults express anger, contempt, & disgust less than Canadian-born Students and Immigrant Students. • Canadian students express more happiness and surprise than immigrant students.

  20. Summary of Findings • In expressing negative emotions (anger, contempt, disgust, & fear) to friends, Canadian adults were more like Canadian students and both groups significantly different from immigrant students. • In expressing negative emotions to acquaintances, Canadian students were more like immigrant students and both group significantly different from Canadian adults.

  21. Conclusion • The present findings compare with other studies on cultural differences in emotional expression among students. • The study adds an important element in the determining the stability of the previous findings as we have included an adult sample. • Future studies need to examine the relation of psychological dimensions of culture that were not examined in the present study.

More Related