Council briefing

1. BUILDING OUR CAPITAL ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ PLACES TO PLAY, PROTECT AND PROSPER ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ . Council briefing ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 6, 2010 December 6, 2010

2. BUILDING OUR CAPITAL ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ PLACES TO PLAY, PROTECT AND PROSPER ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ Presentation Outline ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓂᖅ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ Introduction Study Purpose Recreation Planning Site Selection Process ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓂᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᐅᑉ ᐱᑦᔪᑎᖓ ᐸᕐᓇᐃᓂᖅ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᖓᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᒥᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 6, 2010 December 6, 2010

3. Introduction ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓂᖅ In response to continued rapid growth in Iqaluit, Council has identified the top capital infrastructure project needs for the city, including: ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ ᓱᒃᑲᔪᒻᒪᕆᒻᒥᒃ ᐱᕈᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖓ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᓪᓗᒍ, ᑲᑎᒪᔩᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓯᒪᕗᑦ ᖁᑦᑎᓂᖅᐹᓂᒃ ᐊᑭᑐᔪᑎᑦ ᐱᖁᑎᕐᔪᐊᓄᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒥ, ᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ: • Recreation facilities (including an aquatic centre) • Emergency and Protective Services Centre • City Hall • ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐃᓪᓗᓂᒃ (ᐃᓚᒋᓪᓗᒍ ᐃᒫᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ) • ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ • ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᕕᖓᑦ

4. Purpose of Study ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦᐱᑦᔪᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᖅ A planning study is currently underway to determine potential sites and development optionsfor these new facilities and to answer: ᑖᓐᓇ ᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᒻᒪᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᓯᐅᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓇᓱᐊᖅᑐᑎᒃ ᐃᓂᒋᒐᔭᙳᐊᖅᑕᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓇᓖᕌᕋᔅᓴᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᓄᑖᓄᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᕕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑭᐅᔾᔪᑎᒋᓗᒍ ᐆᒧᖓ: How can the City develop the facilities in the most economical and sustainable manner, meeting the current and long-term needs of the community? ᖃᓄᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᓕᕆᔩᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᔅᓱᐃᔪᓐᓇᖅᑲᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᕕᓐᓂᒃ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᑎᒍᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᐃᓐᓇᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᑲᐅᓂᕐᐹᒥᒃ, ᐊᑐᖅᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᒫᓐᓇ ᐊᑯᓃᖅᑐᒥᓪᓗ ᐱᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᓕᓐᓂᒃ ᑕᒫᓂ ᓄᓇᓕᓐᓂᑦ?

5. The Challenge ᐊᒃᓱᕈᕈᑎᐅᔪᑦ • ᐊᒥᓱᑦᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᐃᓪᓗᖁᑎᖏᑦ40ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑦᐅᖓᑖᓄᑦᐱᑐᖃᐅᓕᕐᒪᑕᐊᒻᒪᓗᐊᑐᕈᒫᓐᓂᐊᖅᕕᒋᓯᒪᔭᒥᓄᑦᐃᓱᓕᒃᑎᓕᖅᑐᑎᒃ. • ᐊᑐᖅᑐᐊᕐᕈᑎᖓᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᒻᒧᑦᐃᓱᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦᒫᑦᓯ 31, 2013-ᖑᓕᖅᑲᑦ; • ᐊᕐᓇᐃᑦᑐᖅᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᐅᑉᑭᓪᓕᖓᐊᒻᒪᓗᓇᑎᖓᐊᓯᔾᔨᕆᐊᖃᑦᑑᒃ; • ᖃᑦᑎᕈᑎᒃᑯᕕᒃᒥᑭᓗᐊᓕᖅᑐᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᐃᓪᓘᑉᒪᓕᒐᕆᔭᕆᐊᖃᑦᑕᖏᓐᓂᒃᐊᒃᓱᒻᒪᕆᐊᓗᒃᓈᒻᒪᖏᔾᔪᑎᖃᓕᖅᑐᓂ; • ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓᑦᐃᓂᖃᕈᓐᓃᕐᒪᑦ, ᐱᓕᕆᔾᔪᑎᖃᑦᑎᐊᖏᑦᑐᓘᓐᓃᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗᖃᓄᐃᒍᑎᖃᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᖃᓕᖅᑐᓂᑎᒥᒧᑦᓈᒻᒪᖏᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᕕᒃ; • ᐃᓅᓱᒃᑐᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃᐃᓂᖃᕆᐊᖃᑦᑐᖅᓄᓇᓖᑦᕿᑎᐊᓂ; • Many of Iqaluit’s facilities are over 40 years old and nearing the end their lifecycle. • The lease on the swimming pool ends March 31, 2013; • The Arnaitok Arena brine lines and structural floor deck requires replacement; • The Fire Hall is undersized and suffers from building code deficiencies; • City Hall is over capacity, lacks basics functions, and is an unhealthy workplace; • The Youth Centre should be located downtown;

6. The Challenge, continued ᐊᒃᓱᕈᕈᑎᐅᔪᑦ, ᑲᔪᓯᔪᑦ • ᐃᓪᓗᐃᑦᐊᓕᐊᓇᐃᒋᔭᐅᓲᖑᔪᑦᑲᓇᑕᒥᐅᑕᓄᑦᐱᑕᖃᖏᑦᑐᑦᐃᖃᓗᓐᓂ. • ᐱᑕᖃᔾᔭᖏᓚᖅᐊᕿᕕᒻᒥᒃᐃᓪᓗᒥᒃ; • ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᓄᓇᓕᓐᓂᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᖃᔾᔭᖏᓚᖅ, ᓄᓇᓖᓪᓕᓄᓇᕗᑦᒥᐱᖃᐅᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ; • ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒥᐃᖃᐃᓕᓴᖅᕕᒃᑕᖃᖏᑦᑐᖅᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᑐᔅᓴᒥᒃᑭᐱᓐᖑᐃᔭᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ • ᐃᖃᐃᓕᓴᖅᕕᐅᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᑕᖄᖅᓯᖅᕕᐅᓗᓂᓲᕐᓗᒧᒥᕐᓂᖅ, ᐃᖃᐃᓕᓴᕐᓂᖅᔫᒐ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗᑯᓛᑎᒋᐅᔅᓴᓂᕐᒧᑦ; • ᒪᔪᕋᖃᑦᑕᕕᒃᓴᒥᒃᐊᕙᓗᒥᒃᐱᑕᖃᖏᑦᑐᖅ; • ᓄᓇᓖᑦᕿᑎᐊᓂᐃᓅᓱᒃᑐᓄᑦᑲᑎᕕᒃᑕᖃᖏᑦᑐᖅ; • ᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐅᓪᓚᕕᒃᒥᑦ/ᐱᓱᒃᕕᒻᒥᑦᐱᑕᖃᖏᑦᑐᖅ; • ᓱᕈᓯᓛᓄᑦᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᕆᐊᓕᓵᖅᑐᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᕕᑦᑕᖃᖏᑦᑐᖅᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐱᓐᖑᐊᕕᒃᓴᒥᒃ; • ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᖃᓄᐃᖏᑎᐊᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦᐱᕈᖅᓴᕕᐅᑦᑎᐊᕐᕈᓐᓇᕋᔭᖅᑐᖅᐊᒻᒪᓗᑲᔪᓯᓯᒪᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ …. • Facilities enjoyed by most Canadian cities don’t exist in Iqaluit. • There is no soccer field house; • Iqaluit does not have a community hall, unlike most Nunavut communities; • There is no city gymnasium or recreational space to practice popular modes of exercise and relaxation like dance, yoga, and martial arts; • There is no climbing wall; • There is no downtown youth centre; • There is no indoorrunning / walking track; • There is no dedicated preschool play area or indoor play area; • Iqaluit would be a healthier place to grow and prosper…

7. Goals and Objectives ᐱᓇᓱᐊᒐᕆᔭᐅᔪᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᑐᕌᖅᑕᐅᓇᓱᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᐅᔪᖅᐸᕐᓇᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦᑎᓴᒪᓂᒃᐱᓪᓗᐊᑕᓂᒃᐱᓕᕆᐊᒃᓴᖅᑕᖃᑉᐳᖅ: 1. ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᓂᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅ, ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅᐊᒻᒪᓗᓴᐳᒻᒥᑦᑎᓇᓱᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᑲᑎᒪᕕᖓᑕᐃᓪᓗᖓᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖓᐊᕐᕌᒎᓂᐊᖅᑐᓄᑦ 25-ᓄᑦ; 2. ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᓗᓂᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦᐃᓪᓗᒃᓴᓄᑦᑐᓐᖓᕕᖃᓪᓗᑎᒃᐊᑯᓂᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦᐸᕐᓇᒃᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒪᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖓᓄᑦ; 3. ᐸᕐᓇᐃᓗᓂᑎᑎᕋᐅᔭᖅᑕᐅᓂᐊᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᓖᑦᐃᓪᓗᐃᑦᑕᒪᒃᑯᓇᓂᓂᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃᐃᓂᒃᓴᓂ; 4. ᐱᒋᐊᖅᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥᒃᑐᓐᖓᕕᖃᑦᑐᒥᒃᓯᕗᓪᓕᐅᑎᑕᐅᔪᒪᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ; ᑕᒪᓐᓇᑲᔪᓯᕙᓪᓕᐊᒐᔭᖅᑐᖅᐊᑐᕐᓗᓂᑐᓴᕋᓱᐊᖃᑦᑕᓂᕐᒥᒃᐃᓱᓕᒃᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊᑕᒪᕐᒥᓕᒫᑦᑕᑯᒃᓴᐅᓕᕐᓗᑎᒃᓂᕈᐊᕈᑕᐅᒍᓐᓇᓕᕐᓗᑎᓪᓗ2011 ᐅᑭᐊᒃᓵᖓᓂ. • The planning process has 4 fundamental goals: • Assess the Recreation, Emergency and Protective Services and City Hall facility needs for the next 25 years; • Select sites for the facilities that best reflect the long-term planning goals of Iqaluit; • Prepare conceptual designs for the required facilities on the selected sites; • Develop an implementation plan based on viable business principles; • The process will continue with a thorough consultation process culminating in the preparation of materials for a Referendum in the Fall of 2011.

8. Consultation Plan ᑐᓴᕋᓱᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ • ᑭᒃᑯᑐᐃᓐᓇᐃᑦᑐᓴᕋᓱᐊᖅᕕᐅᓯᒪᕗᑦᐅᓪᓗᒥᒧᑦᐅᑯᐊᐱᖃᓯᐅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ • ᐊᑕᖐᔪᒥᒃᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃᐊᒻᒪᓗᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦᑲᑎᓐᖓᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦᐊᐱᖅᓱᖃᑦᑕᓂᕐᒥᒃ • ᐅᖃᖃᑎᖃᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅᐊᑐᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᓂᒃᐃᓅᓱᒃᑐᓄᑦᑲᑎᕕᐅᕙᑦᑐᒥᒃ; • ᑲᑎᒪᓃᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐅᖃᖃᑎᖃᕐᓂᖅᐃᓐᓇᑐᖃᕐᓂᒃᖃᒻᒪᖅ; • ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᓃᑦ/ᑲᑎᒪᓃᑦᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑕ • 6-ᓰᓱᖅᑐᓂ ᑭᒃᑯᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓄᑦᖃᐃᒍᒪᔪᓄᑦᒪᑐᐃᓐᖔᖃᑦᑕᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦᐃᖃᓗᓐᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᓂᐊᖁᓐᖒᒥ; • ᐃᓂᒃᓴᖓᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᓂᖅ/ᑲᑎᒪᓂᖅᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᔪᓪᓗᐊᑕᐃᑦᐱᖃᑎᒋᔭᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ; • ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᓃᑦ/ᑲᑎᒪᓃᑦᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᐱᓕᕆᕕᖏᑕᐊᖓᔪᖅᑲᐅᑎᖏᓐᓂᒃᐱᖃᑎᖃᑦᑐᑎᒃ; • ᑲᑎᒪᖃᑎᖃᕐᓃᑦᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᖃᑦᑎᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦᐱᓕᕆᕕᖓᓐᓂᒃ • ᑐᓴᕋᓱᐊᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅᑲᔪᓰᓐᓇᓂᐊᖅᑐᖅᑕᒪᓐᓇᓯᕗᒧᑦᐃᖏᕐᕋᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᓪᓗᒍᐱᓕᕆᐊᕐᕆᔭᐅᔪᖅ. • Public consultation to date has included: • Comprehensive recreation and stakeholder group interviews; • Interviews with Youth centre users; • Meetings and Interviews at Elders Qammaq; • Workshops with City Council • 6 public drop-in sessions in Iqaluit and Apex; • A site analysis workshop with key stakeholders; • Workshops with City Department heads; • Meetings with the Iqaluit Fire Department; • Consultation process will continue throughout the future phases of the project.

9. Needs Assessment ᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎ • ᑕᒪᑐᒧᖓᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦᐃᓚᒋᓪᓗᓂᐅᒃ, ᐃᓄᒋᐊᓐᓂᕆᔭᖓᐊᒻᒪᓗᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᑦᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᐳᑦ… • ᐃᓄᖏᑕᖃᓄᐃᓕᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᑦ • 2015 ᑎᑭᓪᓗᒍᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᐃᓄᖃᓕᕐᓂᐊᕐᕋᓱᒋᔭᐅᕗᖅ 8,500-ᓂᒃ; • ᐊᒻᒪᓗ 15,000-ᓂᒃ 2030-ᒥ; • ᐱᕈᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᖅ = ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᑦ 3-ᐳᓴᒻᒥᒃ; • ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᐃᓄᖏᑦ ‘ᒪᒃᑯᑐᒻᒪᕆᐅᕗᑦ’ 25-ᐳᓴᖓ 14 ᑐᖔᓂᓗᐊᕐᕌᒍᖃᑉᐳᑦ; • ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦᖃᓄᐃᓕᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ • ᒪᒃᑯᑦᑐᑦᐃᓐᓇᐅᓂᖅᓴᐃᓪᓗᐃᓄᑑᔪᖅᓯᐅᑎᐅᓂᖅᓴᓂᒃᐱᓐᖑᐊᕈᑎᓂᒃᐊᑐᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᕗᑦ; ᒪᒃᑯᑐᖅᓯᐅᑎᑦᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᖅᕖᑦᐊᑲᐅᓂᖅᐸᒥᒃᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒪᔪᓐᓇᖅᐳᑦᑲᑎᓐᖓᔭᕌᖓᑕᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦᐊᕐᕌᒍᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒪᔪᓂ; • ᑕᒪᒃᑮᒃ ‘ᐅᐸᒃᑕᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ’ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ‘ᐸᕐᓇᒃᓯᒪᕙᒌᑦᑐᑦ’ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒃᓴᐃᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᒪᕙᓪᓕᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᓂᐊᖅᐳᑦ; As part of the study, population and recreation trends were analyzed… Demographic Trends • The population of Iqaluit is expected to grow to 8500 people by 2015; • And to 15,000 people by 2030; • Growth = almost 3% per year; • Iqaluit’s population is ‘young’ with 25% under 14; Recreation Trends • Youth and elders are moving toward more individualizedsport; Youth facilities work best when mixed in multi-generational settings; • Both ‘Drop-in’ and Organized programs will be in high demand;

10. Needs Assessment, continued ᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎ, ᑲᔪᓯᔪᖅ • ᐱᓕᕆᔩᑦᑕᑯᓇᓚᐅᕐᒥᔪᑦᑕᐅᖅᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅᐃᓪᓗᖁᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᓂᒃ… • ᐊᕐᓇᐃᑦᑐᖅᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᒃᐊᕐᕌᒍᑦ 40 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᑦᐱᑐᖃᐅᑎᒋᓕᕐᒪᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᓕᖅᑐᓂᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖓᓂᒃ; • ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᖓᐱᑐᖄᓘᒻᒥᔪᖅᐊᒻᒪᓗᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᓕᖅᑐᓂᑦᑕᐅᖅᐊᑐᖅᑐᐊᕈᑎᖓᓂᒃᒫᑦᓯ 31, 2013. ᓄᓇᓖᑦᐱᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦᓈᒻᒪᐅᑎᒍᓐᓃᕐᒪᑦ; • ᖃᑦᑎᕆᕕᒃᑯᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᑲᑎᒪᕕᖓᐃᓂᖃᖏᓗᐊᖅᑐᒻᒪᕆᐊᓘᓕᕐᒪᑦ, ᐱᐅᒍᓐᓃᖅᑐᓂᐊᓄᕌᖅᕕᖃᖏᑎᐊᖅᑐᓂᐊᓂᐊᕕᒻᒥᒃᐃᓪᓗᒧᓪᓗᒪᓕᒐᒃᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓕᓐᓂᒃᒪᓕᖏᓗᐊᓕᖅᑐᓂ; • ᑰᓕᕝᕕᒃᓄᑖᖑᔪᖅᐊᒻᒪᓗᖃᓄᐃᖏᑎᐊᖅᑐᓂ; • ᓄᑖᖅᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ AWG ᓄᑖᖑᔪᖅᖃᓄᐃᖏᑎᐊᖅᑐᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖏᓐᓇᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᓗ. • The team also looked at the existing facilities… • Arnaitok Arena is about 40 years old and at the end of it’s life cycle; • City of Iqaluit Pool is also very old and at the end of its lease March 31, 2013. It does not meet the needs of our community; • The Fire HallandCity Hall are seriously under capacity, with many building code deficiencies; • The Curling Rink is newly acquired and in good condition; • AWG Complex is new and in good condition and will remain active.

11. Recreation Facility Needs ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐃᓪᓗᒥᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖅ • ᑕᒪᒃᑯᓂᖓᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓚᐅᖅᐳᖅᐅᑯᐊᓄᑖᑦᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᖅᕖᑦᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᓖᑦ: • ᐃᒪᖅᓯᖅᕕᒃᐳᐃᔪᕋᖅᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂ 25-ᒥᒃ ᑕᑭᓂᓕᒻᒥᒃ, ᐃᒪᕐᓯᖅᕕᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᒥᒃ, ᑎᓱᕋᖅᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂ, ᐆᓇᖅᑐᒦᕝᕕᒃᐊᒻᒪᓗᐊᑲᐅᒃᑲᓐᓂᖓᕝᕕᒃ; • ᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐊᕿᕕᑦᑕᖃᓪᓗᓂ; • ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᕿᑎᐊᓂᒪᒃᑯᑦᑐᓄᑦᑲᑎᕕᒃᑕᖃᓪᓗᓂ; • ᐃᖃᐃᓕᓴᖅᕕᒃᒥᑦ; • ᐃᓐᓇᕐᓄᑦᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᖅᕕᒃ; • ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᕈᒫᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᒥᒃᒧᒥᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᑯᓛᑎᒋᐅᔅᓴᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᔫᒐ, ᓴᓇᕈᓘᔭᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ; • ᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᖅᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᓂᓄᓇᓕᓐᓂᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᐅᓗᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᑰᖃᕝᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂ; • ᒪᔪᕋᖅᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂᐊᕙᓗᒥᒃ; • ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᖃᑦᑕᓂᐊᖅᑐᒥᒃᓂᕿᓄᑦ, ᐃᒥᒐᕐᓄᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᓄᑦ; • ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᕆᐊᓕᓵᖅᑐᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᕕᒃᓴᖅᐃᓗᐊᓂᐃᓪᓘᑉᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂ; • ᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐅᓪᓚᒃᕕᒃᐊᒻᒪᓗᐱᓱᒃᕕᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅ; • ᑐᓐᖓᓱᒃᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦᐳᓛᖅᕕᒃᑲᑎᒪᕕᐅᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᓂᐳᓚᐅᑎᓗᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᐅᐸᑦᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂ; • ᓯᓚᒥᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᒃᐅᖅᑰᓴᖅᑐᒥᒃᐅᖂᑕᖃᓪᓗᓂ; • A Gap Analysis revealed the following new recreation facilities are required: • Aquatics Centre with 25M lap pool, leisure pool, water slide, hot tub & saunas; • IndoorSoccer Field House; • DowntownYouth Centre; • Fitness Centre; • Elders area; • Recreational Spacefor dance, martial arts, yoga, arts and crafts; • Multi-useFlexi-Hall to be used as a Community Hall and Gymnasium with kitchen; • A Climbing Wall; • Tenant Spacesfor food, beverages and services; • Pre-school play area with indoor playground; • IndoorRunning & Walking Track; • A welcomingLobbythat is a social gathering space and facility connector; • Outdoor Rink with heated shelter;

12. Recreational Ice Dilemma ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕖᑦ ᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᑦ ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑕᐅᒍᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ • ᒪᕐᕉᒃᓇᓖᕌᕈᑕᐅᒍᓐᓇᖅᑑᒃᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑎᔅᓴᐅᔫᒃᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕖᑦᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᓄᑦ… • ᓄᑖᖅᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ ‘ᓄᑖᑐᐃᓐᓇᐅᒻᒪᑦ’. ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᒫᓐᓇᕈᓗᒃᓇᒻᒥᓂᖁᑎᖃᓛᓕᖅᑐᑦᑰᓕᕝᕕᒻᒥᒃ. ᑕᒪᒃᑮᒃᐃᓪᓘᒃᓱᕐᕋᔾᔮᖏᑦᑐᑎᒃ. • ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦᒪᕐᕉᓐᓂᒃᓯᑯᖃᑦᑑᓐᓂᒃᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᖃᕆᐊᖃᔾᔮᖏᑦᑐᖅ; • ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᐅᔪᖅᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅᐊᓯᖏᓐᓂᒃᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦᐃᓪᓗᑕᖃᑦᑎᓪᓗᒍ, ᐊᐃᑉᐹᓂᒃᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᒥᒃᑲᔪᓯᒍᓐᓇᖏᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓕᕝᓖᑦ; • ᑭᓯᐊᓂᓕ!!!! • ᐊᒥᓱᐊᑦᑎᐅᖃᓪᓚᖃᑎᖃᖃᑦᑕᑎᓪᓗᖏᑦ, ᐊᑦᔨᒌᒥᒃᑐᓴᖅᑎᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ: ᓱᕈᓰᑦᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒦᑦᑐᑦᕼᐋᑭᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᑎᒃᑕᒫᓂᖅᑭᑐᐃᓐᓇᓂᐊᖏᒻᒪᑕ; • ᐊᕕᑦᑐᖅᓯᒪᔪᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᕕᔾᔪᐊᖅᕕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦᐊᑭᑦᑐᕋᐅᑎᔪᖃᑦᑎᓪᓗᒍᐱᓪᓗᐊᒥᒃᓲᕐᓗᐅᑭᐅᖅᑕᖅᑐᒥᐱᓐᖑᐊᕕᔾᔪᐊᕐᓂᖅ, ᐊᐃᑉᐸᖓᓂᒃᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᒥᒃᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕋᔭᖅᑐᖅ; Two options are under consideration for Recreational Ice surfaces… The AWG complex is ‘like’ new. The City will soon own the Curling Rink. Both Facilities will stay. • Iqaluit may not need two regulation ice arenas; • Recreational analysis suggests that with other new recreational facilities, a second ice surface may not be sustainable; However!!!! • Throughout the many consultation sessions a common message was heard: children at risk play hockey to stay off the street; • In order to host territorial tournaments or major competitions such as the Arctic Winter Games, a second ice surface is required;

13. Recreational Ice Options ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅ ᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎᑦ TWO OPTIONS ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑏᒃ 2 main considerations for Ice will be carried forward until an informed decision can be made based on business planning. ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑎᔅᓴᓪᓗᐊᑖᒃ ᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᒧᑦ ᑲᔪᓯᑎᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑑᒃ ᑐᑭᑖᕈᑎᓕᐅᕋᓱᐊᕐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᖃᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᖅᑎᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃ. Option A ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑦ A • Maintain the Curling Rink and the AWG Complex; • Phase out Arnaitok Arena; • Add an Indoor Leisure Rink (40% of regulation sheet) next to the AWG Complex; • Add a Soccer Field House that is convertible to ice; • Add an Outdoor Rink with heated shelter within the community; • ᒪᑭᒪᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃᑰᓕᕝᕕᒻᒥᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒻᒥᒃ; • ᐊᑐᕈᓐᓃᑎᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᓗᒍᐊᕐᓇᐃᑦᑐᖅᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ; • ᐃᓚᓗᒍᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᒥᒃ (40-ᐳᓴᓐᖓᓂ ᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᐅᑉᐊᖏᓂᖃᓪᓗᓂ) ᓴᓂᐊᓂ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᐅᑉ; • ᐃᓚᓗᒍᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐊᑦᔨᖐᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᕕᒻᒥᒃᓯᑯᑦᑕᕈᓐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃ; • ᐃᓚᓗᒍᓯᓚᒥᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᒻᒥᒃᐅᖅᑰᓴᕈᓐᓇᕐᓗᓂᐅᒃᑯᐊᖓᐃᓗᐊᓂᓄᓇᓕᑦ; Option B ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑦ B • Maintain the Curling Rink and the AWG Complex; • Phase out Arnaitok Arena; • Add an Full Sized Ice Surface next to the AWG Complex; • Add a Soccer Field House that is non-convertible to ice; • Add an Outdoor Rink with heated shelter within the community; • ᒪᑭᒪᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃᑰᓕᕝᕕᒻᒥᒃᐊᒻᒪᓗ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒻᒥᒃ; • ᐊᑐᕈᓐᓃᑎᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᓗᒍᐊᕐᓇᐃᑦᑐᖅᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ; • ᐃᓚᓗᒍᐊᖏᓂᖓᑎᑐᑦᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᐅᑉᓯᑯᖃᑦᑐᒥᒃᓴᓂᐊᓂᓄᑖᑉᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᐅᑉ AWG; • ᐃᓚᓗᒍᐊᕿᕕᒻᒥᒃᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᓯᑯᓕᕈᓐᓇᖏᓪᓗᓂ; • ᐃᓚᓗᒍᓯᓚᒦᑦᑐᒥᒃᓯᐊᕐᕆᔮᖅᕕᒻᒥᒃᐅᖅᑰᓴᕈᓐᓇᕐᓗᓂᐅᒃᑯᐊᖓᐃᓗᐊᓂᓄᓇᓕᑦ;

14. Downtown Recreation Facility ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᕿᑎᐊᓂᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ ᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᒃ ᐃᒪᖃᕝᕕᓪᓗᐊᑕᖓ/ᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᖓ ᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅ ᑎᓱᕕᒃᐃᒫᓄᑦ ᐃᒪᖅᓯᖅᕕᒃᐃᒪᖓᐊᐅᓚᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂ ᐊᐅᒃᑲᓐᓂᖓᕕᒃ ᐊᓐᓄᕌᖅᕕᖏᑦ ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑏᑦ/ᐋᓐᓂᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᓗ ᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ ᐊᕿᕕᒃᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᑕᑯᓈᕆᐊᖅᓯᒪᔪᓄᑦᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᓐᓄᕌᖅᕖᑦ ᐃᓪᓘᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕖᑦ ᐊᕙᓗᒃᑯᑦᒪᔪᕋᕐᓂᖅ ᐃᖃᐃᓕᓴᖅᕕᒃ ᐱᓱᒃᕕᒃ/ᐅᓪᓚᒃᕕᒃ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᕆᐊᓕᓵᖅᑐᓄᑦᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ/ᐃᓗᐊᓂᐃᓪᓘᑉ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ ᒪᒃᑯᑦᑐᓄᑦᑲᑎᕕᒃ ᐃᓐᓇᕐᓄᑦᓇᔪᒐᕆᔭᐅᔪᖅ ᑭᒃᑯᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓄᑦᐳᓛᖅᕕᒃ ᒥᑭᑦᑐᖅᑭᓱᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᒧᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᒍᓐᓇᖅᑐᖅᐃᓪᓗᕈᓯᖅ ᕿᑎᐊᓃᑦᑐᖅᑭᓱᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓄᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᒍᓐᓇᖅᑐᖅᐃᓪᓗᕈᓯᖅ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᓘᔭᖅᕕᒃ ᑰᖃᕝᕕᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕕᒃ/ᐱᓕᒻᒪᔅᓴᖅᕕᒃ ᐃᓪᓗᒥᒃᐊᑐᖅᑐᐊᖅᑐᑦᓇᔪᒐᖓ ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑏᑦᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖏᑦ ᓂᕿᓄᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐃᒥᒐᔅᓴᓄᑦ POOL SPACES Main Tank \ Lap Pool Leisure Tank Water Slide Whirl Pool Sauna Change Rooms Staff/ First Aid FIELDHOUSE SPACES Soccer Field House Spectator Area Change Rooms DRY RECREATION SPACES Climbing Wall Fitness Centre Walking/ Jogging Track Pre-School Rec Area \ Indoor Playground Youth Centre Elders Area Public Lounge Area Small Multi-purpose Room Medium Multi-purpose Room Flexi-hall Kitchen Board/ Training Room Tenant Lease Area Staff Offices Food and Beverage

15. Space Examples ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᓄᑦᐆᑦᑑᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᒫᓂ Aquatics . ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ: ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ

16. Space Examples ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᓄᑦᐆᑦᑑᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓱᕈᓯᕐᓂᒃ ᑲᑎᑦᑕᖅᕕᒃ Youth Centre ᐊᕙᓗᒃᑯᑦ ᒪᔪᕋᕐᓂᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓪᓘᑉ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᕐᓂᖅ Climbing Walls and Dry Rec . ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ: ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ

17. Space Examples ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᓄᑦᐆᑦᑑᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᓪᓘᑉ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ Dry Recreation Spaces ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑐᐃᔪᓄᑦ ᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᕐᓂᖅ Support Spaces Field House . ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ : ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ

18. Space Examples ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᓄᑦᐆᑦᑑᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᑭᐱᓐᖑᐃᔭᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓯᓚᒥ ᓯᖁᖃᑦᑐᓂ Leisure and Outdoor Ice Surfaces . ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ : ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ

19. BUILDING OUR CAPITAL ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ PLACES TO PLAY, PROTECT AND PROSPER ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᑦᑎᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ Presentation Outline ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓂᖅᐅᖃᐅᓯᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ Site Selection Process Site Selection Criteria Locational Considerations ᐃᓂᒃᓴᖓᓂᒃᓂᕈᐊᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᖓᓂᒃ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᐸᓐᓕᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓇᓃᓐᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑎᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ . ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 6, 2010 December 6, 2010

20. Process for site selection ᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᒥᒃᓂᕈᐊᕋᓱᐊᕐᓂᖅ phase 1 ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖅ1 1. Review a broad, inclusive list of sites for all the facilities; 2. Create a short list; 3. Evaluate the short-listed sites through a participatory process; Outcome: an overview of opportunities & constraints for each potential site 1. ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓗᓂᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑐᒻᒪᕆᓐᓂᒃ, ᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᒍᓐᓇᕋᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃᐃᓪᓗᓕᒫᓄᑦ 2. ᓇᐃᑦᑐᒥᒃᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᒥᒃᓴᖅᑮᓗᓂ 3. ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᖅᓇᐃᑦᑐᒥᒃᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃᐱᓕᕆᖃᑎᒌᓐᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᓴᖅᑮᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ: ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃᐊᔪᕈᑕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦᑲᔪᓯᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃᐊᑐᓂᒃᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᒐᔭᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓄᑦ

21. Process for site selection ᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᒥᒃᓂᕈᐊᕋᓱᐊᕐᓂᖅ phase 2 ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖅ2 • Analyze in greater detail a short list (2-4) of potential sites • Create Site Plans for short listed sites, with input from stakeholders • Outcome: a recommendation for a final site(s) • ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓗᓂᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑎᖅᓯᒪᓂᖅᓴᒃᑯᑦᓇᐃᑦᑐᒥᒃ(2-4) ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᒥᒃᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃ • ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓄᑦᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᓕᐅᕐᓗᓂᓇᐃᑦᑐᒃᑯᑦᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃ, ᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃᑐᓴᖅᕕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᓴᖅᑮᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ: ᑭᖑᓪᓕᖅᐹᒥᒃᐃᓂᒃᓴᕆᔭᐅᔪᓂᒃᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᔾᔪᑎᑦ

22. Site Selection Criteria ᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᒥᒃᓂᕈᐊᕋᓱᐊᕐᓂᖅ City Area and Vision ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᐅᑉᐃᓗᐊᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᑕᐅᑐᒐᕆᔭᐅᔪᖅ Public benefits ᐃᓄᓐᓄᑦᐃᑲᔫᑏᑦ Value creation ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐅᔪᒥᒃᓴᖅᑮᓯᓂᖅ Longevity ᐊᑯᓂᐅᓂᖓ Function and programming ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓᐊᒻᒪᓗᐱᓕᕆᐊᕐᖑᓂᖓ Access, parking, and servicing ᐊᑐᕆᐊᑦ, ᓄᖅᑲᖓᕝᕖᒃᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ Capital and operating costs ᐊᑭᑐᔪᖅᑐᕈᑎᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦᑮᓈᐅᔭᖅᑐᕈᑎᑦ

23. Locational Considerations ᓇᓃᓐᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ Recreational ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅ • capitalizing on benefits of being near civic functions without competing with those uses, contributing to clearer development patterns; • additional land options to suit significant spatial and infrastructural needs; • providing moreequal access for residents who live inside and outside of the Core; • facilitating resource-sharing and synergies between recreational uses (e.g. community shuttle buses, staffing, maintenance, servicing, etc.) • ᐊᑐᕐᓗᓂᐊᑲᐅᒍᓐᓇᐅᑎᒋᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃᓴᖅᑭᔮᖅᐸᒌᖅᑐᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦᐃᓱᒫᓘᑎᖃᕆᐊᖃᖏᓪᓗᓂᐊᓯᖏᓐᓄᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᑕ, ᑕᒪᓐᓇᑲᔪᓯᕚᓪᓕᑎᑦᑎᓂᐊᖅᐳᖅᐋᖅᑭᒃᑕᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᓂᒃᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒪᑦᑎᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ • ᐊᓯᒃᑲᓐᓂᖏᑦᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦᑕᑯᓇᓪᓗᒋᑦᐊᑲᐅᓂᖅᓴᐅᖁᓪᓗᒍᐃᓂᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖅᐊᒻᒪᓗᐃᓪᓗᕐᔪᐊᓂᒃᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖅ • ᐱᑕᖃᑦᑎᑦᑎᓗᓂᑭᒃᑯᓕᒫᓄᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃᑕᕝᕙᓂᓄᓇᖃᑦᑐᓄᑦᓄᓇᓖᑦᕿᑎᓪᓚᕆᐊᓂᐊᒻᒪᓗᓯᓚᑎᒋᓂᖅᓴᖓᓂ • ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓱᐃᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᓂᑭᓱᓕᕆᔾᔪᑎᓂᒃᑲᑐᔾᔨᓂᒃᑯᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᐱᓇᓱᐊᖃᑎᒌᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᓂᒃᑯᑦᑕᒪᒃᑯᑎᒎᓇᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᓄᑦ(ᓲᕐᓗᓄᓇᓕᓐᓂᕚᓯᖃᕐᓂᖅ, ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑎᖃᕐᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐋᖅᑭᐅᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐱᔨᑦᑎᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐊᓯᖏᑎᒍᓪᓗ)

24. Locational Considerations ᓇᓃᓐᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ Emergency ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅ • To reduce emergency response, emergency functions may benefit from locating at the Core, where: • most volunteers and workers live • most community activities take place (fire fighters and volunteers often take part) • the greatest number of residents live • civic presence • Locate along clear access routes to key areas; • Locate where adequate space is available to accommodate main and supporting uses; • Locate/design to minimize impacts on adjacent land uses where possible; • ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᖃᑉᐸᑦ ᐅᐸᑦᑕᐅᓴᕋᐃᑦᑐᓇᕐᓂᖓ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᓗᒍ, ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᔾᔪᑎᑦ ᐊᑲᐅᓛᖑᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᖃᑉᐳᑦ ᓄᓇᓖᑦ ᕿᑎᐊᓃᑉᐸᑕ, ᓲᖃᐃᒻᒪ: • ᑕᒪᕐᒥᐸᓗᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᔨᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑏᓪᓗ ᑕᒫᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᐅᒻᒪᑕ • ᑕᒪᕐᒥᐸᓗᒃ ᓄᓇᓕᓐᓂ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᕙᑦᑐᑦ ᑕᒫᓃᖃᑦᑕᕐᒪᑕ (ᖃᑦᑎᕆᔩᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑎᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᓂᖅᓴᐅᕙᓕᕐᓗᑎᒃ) • ᐅᓄᕐᓂᖅᓴᐃᑦ ᓄᓇᓖᑦ ᑕᒫᓃᒻᒪᑕ • ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᐃᑦ ᑕᒫᓐᓃᓐᓂᖓ • ᐊᖅᑯᑎᓪᓗᐊᑕᓐᓄᓪᓗ ᑕᒪᓐᓇ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᐅᕙᒌᖅᑐᓂ ᐅᐸᑦᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓕᓐᓄᑦ • ᐃᓂᑖᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᓈᒻᒪᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᕝᕕᓪᓗᐊᑕᖅ ᐃᓂᖃᑦᑎᐊᖁᓪᓗᒍ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᓯᓕᒫᖏᑦ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑑᑎᓂᒃ ᐃᓂᖃᖃᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ; • ᐃᓂᖓ/ᑎᑎᕋᐅᔭᖅᓯᒪᓂᖓ ᐋᖅᑭᓪᓗᒍ ᐊᒃᑐᐃᓂᖃᓗᐊᖁᓇᒍ ᓴᓂᕌᓃᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᓄᓇᒥᒃ ᐊᔪᕐᓇᓐᖏᑐᐊᖅᑲᑦ;

25. Locational Considerations ᓇᓃᓐᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ Civic Functions ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦᐊᐅᓚᓂᖏᑦ • ᒪᓕᓪᓗᓂᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᐃᑦᑕᐅᑐᓐᖑᐊᖅᑕᖓᓂᒃ; • ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᓗᓂᓇᓗᓇᓐᖏᑎᐊᖅᑐᒥᒃᕿᑎᐊᓃᓪᓗᐊᑕᖅᑐᒥᒃᐅᐸᑦᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᓂᐊᖅᑐᒥᒃ/ᐊᖓᔪᖅᑳᖃᕝᕕᒃᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒪᓂᖓ; • ᓴᓐᖏᔪᒻᒪᕆᐊᓗᒻᒥᒃᓄᓇᓕᒻᒥᒃᑐᓐᖓᕕᖃᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂ, ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᐃᑦᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒪᓂᖓᓂᒃᐊᒻᒪᓗᑕᑯᒃᓴᐅᓂᖃᓪᓗᓂᑕᕝᕙᓂᕿᑎᐊᓂᐅᐸᑲᑦᑕᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᓛᖑᓂᐊᖅᑐᒥ; • comply with the city’s vision; • create a distinct Core Area / Capital District; • facilitate a strong community heart, civic realm and presence at the Core where there is greatest accessibility;

26. Locational Considerations ᓇᓃᓐᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ General Considerations ᑭᓱᑐᐃᓐᓇᐃᑦᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑎᔅᓴᐃᑦ • embracing sustainability by encouraging walking to civic functions, using land and resources efficiently and focusing growth for a clearer development pattern • capitalizing on co-location efficiencies: cost-savings in construction, operations, and maintenance • generating economic opportunitiesby focusing activity at the Core • ᐊᑐᕐᓗᓂ ᐊᑐᒃᑲᓐᓂᕈᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᓲᕐᓗ ᑎᓕᐅᖅᑐᐃᓗᓂ ᐱᓱᖃᑦᑕᖁᔨᓂᕐᒥᒃ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᖅᕕᐅᕙᑦᑐᓄᑦ, ᓄᓇᒥᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓄᓇᒦᖔᖅᓯᒪᔪᒥᒃ ᐊᑐᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂ ᑐᑭᖃᑦᑎᐊᖅᑐᒥᓪᓗ ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᓯᒪᓗᓂ ᐱᕈᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ • ᐊᑐᕐᓗᓂ ᑕᕝᕙᓂᑦᑕᐃᓐᓇᖅ ᓄᓇᒦᖃᑎᒌᓐᓂᕐᒥᒃ, ᑮᓇᐅᔭᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᒪᑐᑎᒎᓇ ᓴᓇᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐋᖅᑭᐅᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᒃᑯᑦ • ᐱᑕᖃᑦᑎᑦᑎᓗᓂ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᓕᐅᕋᓱᓐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᑐᕐᓗᓂ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕐᓂᐅᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᓖᑦ ᕿᑎᐊᓂ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᕙᓪᓗᑎᒃ

27. Site Evaluation ᐃᓂᒃᓴᒥᒃᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᖅ 20 sites were evaluated for opportunities & constraints based on the locational considerations and the selection criteria: 20 ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕋᔅᓴᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓄᑲᖓᔾᔪᑎᓄᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᖃᑦᑐᑎᒃ ᓇᓃᓐᓂᕆᒐᔭᖅᑕᖓᓂᒃ ᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑎᖃᕐᓂᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᓯᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ: December 6, 2010 December 6, 2010

28. Site Exploration ᐃᓂᒃᓴᓂᒃᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᖅ ᑖᒃᑯᓇᓐᖓᑦ 20-ᖑᔪᓂᒃ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐅᔪᓂᒃ, ᖃᑦᑎᑲᓪᓚᐃᑦ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᓪᓗᐊᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᒃᑲᓂᕐᓂᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐃᓪᓗᒃᓴᓄᑦ Of the 20 sites, several key sites were identified for further exploration for the facilities ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᒃᑲᓐᓂᕆᐊᓖᑦ: Sites for further exploration: ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐃᓪᓗᐃᑦ Recreational facilities ᓯᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᕕᖓ City Hall Emergency services ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ

29. Development Options ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦᓇᓕᕌᕈᑏᑦ The sites were evaluated as possible development options based on the site fit, location, and other key considerations. ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᓚᐅᕐᒪᑕ ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎᐅᔪᓐᓇᕆᐊᕐᖓᑕ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑐᓐᖓᕕᖃᑦᑐᑎᒃ ᐃᓂᖓᑕ ᓈᒻᒪᓐᓂᖓᓂᒃ, ᓇᓃᓐᓂᖓ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᓯᖏᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑎᔅᓴᓪᓗᐊᑕᐃᑦ. ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 6, 2010 December 6, 2010

30. Site Concepts & Further Evaluation ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᒐᔭᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᑦᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦᐊᒻᒪᓗᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᑲᓐᓂᕐᓂᖏᑦ • Site concepts were developed for the development options identified to test how the facilities could potentially fit on the sites. • The site selection process, development options, and site concepts were brought to the public for feedback at Open Houses on November 12th and 13th • Further evaluation of the site concepts and feedback received resulted in the Selected Sites • ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᒐᔭᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦᐋᖅᑭᒃᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᐳᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑎᕆᔾᔪᑕᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᖃᓄᖅ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊ ᐱᓕᕆᕝᕕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᓱᖅᓯᒪᒐᔭᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᓂ. • ᑕᒪᓐᓇ ᐃᓂᖃᕝᕕᒻᒥᒃ ᓂᕈᐊᕐᓂᐅᔪᖅ, ᑲᔪᓯᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖓᓄᓪᓗ ᐃᓱᒪᔅᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓂᒋᔭᐅᒐᔭᓐᖑᐊᖅᑑᑉ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᑭᒃᑯᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓄᑦ ᑐᓴᖅᑕᐅᑎᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᓚᐅᖅᐳᖅ ᒪᑐᐃᖓᑎᑦᑎᑎᓪᓗᑕ ᐅᐸᒍᒪᔪᓄᑦ ᓄᕕᐱᕆ 12-ᒥ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ 13-ᒥ • ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᑲᓐᓂᕐᓂᕆᔭᖓ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑭᒃᑯᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓂᒃ ᑐᓴᖅᑕᐅᕙᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᕈᑎᐅᓕᓚᐅᖅᐳᑦ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ

31. Selected Sites ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ Of the 19 sites, several key sites were identified for further exploration for the facilities Selected Sites for: ᐃᓂᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᓕᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᑯᓄᖓ: ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐃᓪᓗᐃᑦ Recreational facilities ᓯᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᕕᖓ City Hall ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 6, 2010 December 6, 2010 Emergency services ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ

32. Recreational Facilities ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦᐃᓪᓗᐃᑦ Existing City Hall - phased ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓᑦ - ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᖅ Existing Curling Club Existing Curling Club Existing Arena & City Hall NEW DRY RECREATION AQUATICS CENTRE AQUATICS CENTRE Phase 1 – Aquatics Centre Phase 2 – Dry Recreation ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖅ 2 – ᐃᓪᓘᑉ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖅ 1 – ᐃᒫᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ

33. Existing City Hall AWG Site – Option A ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᐅᑉ ᐃᓂᖓ – ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ A New Pool Dry Recreation Centre AWG Complex + Leisure Ice Surface + Convertible Field House ᓄᑖᖅ ᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᒃ ᐃᓪᓘᑉ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ + ᐊᓐᓂᑭᑦᑐᐊᕐᔪᒃᕕᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅ ᓯᑯᖃᓪᓗᓂ + ᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᕈᕈᓐᓇᕐᓗᓂ Existing Curling Club EXISTING AWG COMPLEX NEW DRY RECREATION AQUATICS CENTRE Field House Leisure Sheet

34. Existing City Hall AWG Site – Option B ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᐅᑉᐃᓂᖓ – ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ B New Pool Dry Recreation Centre with Field House AWG Complex + Regulation Ice Surface ᓄᑖᖅ ᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᒃ ᓇᑎᓕᒃ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ ᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᖃᓪᓗᓂ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ + ᓯᑯᖃᓪᓗᓂ Existing Curling Club EXISTING AWG COMPLEX NEW DRY RECREATION AQUATICS CENTRE Regulation Ice Sheet

35. Existing City Hall AWG Site – Option C ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᐅᑉᐃᓂᖓ – ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ C New Pool Dry Recreation Centre AWG Complex + Regulation Ice Surface + Field House ᓄᑖᖅ ᐳᐃᔾᔪᕋᖅᕕᒃ ᓇᑎᓕᒃ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ AWG ᕼᐋᑭᕝᕕᒃ + ᐊᓐᓂᑭᑦᑐᐊᔪᒃᕕᒃ + ᐊᑦᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᒃ Existing Curling Club EXISTING AWG COMPLEX NEW DRY RECREATION AQUATICS CENTRE Ice Sheet + Field House Stacked

36. Emergency Services ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ Corner to Road to Nowhere - option 1 Corner to Road to Nowhere - option 2 ᑎᕆᖅᑯᐊᓂᑕᓯᕈᓗᓕᐊᕆᐊᑉ - ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ 1 ᑎᕆᖅᑯᐊᓂ ᑕᓯᕈᓗᓕᐊᕆᐊᑉ - ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ 2 Road to Nowhere Road to Nowhere

37. Emergency Services ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ QIA Land – Federal Road - option 1 QIA Land – Federal Road - option 2 QIA-ᑯᑦᓄᓇᖁᑎᖓ– ᐅᑮᕕᑐᖃᒻᒧᕆᐊᖅ - ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ 1 QIA-ᑯᑦᓄᓇᖁᑎᖓ– ᐅᑮᕕᑐᖃᒻᒨᕆᐊᖅ - ᓇᓖᕋᕈᑎ 2 Federal Road Federal Road

38. Emergency Services ᑐᐊᕕᓐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕈᑎᑦ Frosty Refrigeration Lots - option 1 Frosty Refrigeration Lots - option 2 ᖁᐊᖅᑎᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ - ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ 1 ᖁᐊᖅᑎᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ - ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎ 2 Elks Lodge Elks Lodge Trigram Building Trigram Building

39. City Hall ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓ Airbase Garage Old Courthouse ᖃᖓᑕᓲᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓄᓇᓯᐅᑎᖃᕝᕕᖓ ᐃᖅᑲᑦᑐᐃᕕᑐᖃᖅ Elders Qammaq Tumiit Plaza Arctic College Post Office

40. City Hall ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᒡᕕᖓ Existing Legislature Building ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᒪᓕᒐᓕᐅᖅᕕᒃ Potential Option to obtain the existing legislature after new one is constructed ᓇᓖᕌᕈᑎᔅᓴᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᒥᔪᖅ ᐱᔭᐅᓗᓂ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᒪᓕᒐᓕᐅᖅᕕᒃ ᓄᑖᖅ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓚᐅᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ

41. BUILDING OUR CAPITAL ᓄᓇᓕᐸᐅᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ PLACES TO PLAY, PROTECT AND PROSPER ᐱᓐᖑᐊᖅᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃ, ᓴᐳᔾᔨᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ . ᑎᓯᐱᕆ 6, 2010 December 6, 2010