slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Maggie McNally, James Curtain, Kirsty O’Brien, Borislav D Dimitrov, and Tom Fahey

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

Maggie McNally, James Curtain, Kirsty O’Brien, Borislav D Dimitrov, and Tom Fahey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 70 Views
  • Uploaded on

HRB Centre for Primary Care Research Department of General Practice. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Predicting severity of pneumonia in general practice: a meta-analysis of the CRB-65 criteria. Maggie McNally, James Curtain, Kirsty O’Brien, Borislav D Dimitrov, and Tom Fahey. Outline.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Maggie McNally, James Curtain, Kirsty O’Brien, Borislav D Dimitrov, and Tom Fahey' - rene


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

HRB Centre for Primary Care Research

Department of General Practice

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Predicting severity of pneumonia in general practice: a meta-analysis of the CRB-65 criteria

Maggie McNally, James Curtain, Kirsty O’Brien, Borislav D Dimitrov, and Tom Fahey

outline
Outline
  • What is a clinical prediction rule?
  • Assessment of clinical prediction rules
  • CRB-65: a clinical prediction rule
  • Statistical methods in meta-analysis
  • Results
  • Conclusions
  • Future work
clinical prediction rule
Clinical Prediction Rule
  • Clinical tool that quantifies contribution of:
    • History
    • Examination
    • Diagnostic tests
  • Stratify patients according to probability of having target disorder
  • Outcome can be in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, referral or treatment
stages of assessment of a clinical prediction rule
Stages of assessment of a Clinical Prediction Rule

Step 1: Derivation

identification of factors with predictive power

Step 2: Validation

evidence of reproducible accuracy

Narrow Broad

Step 3: Impact Analysis

evidence of rule changing behaviour and improving outcome

Level of Evidence

4

3

2

1

crb 65 a clinical prediction rule
CRB-65: a clinical prediction rule

Confusion

Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min

Blood pressure (SBP≤ 90 or DBP≤60)

Age ≥ 65

1 or 2

0

3 or 4

Low Risk

mortality 1.2%

Intermediate Risk

mortality 8.13%

High Risk

mortality 31%

Likely suitable for home treatment

Consider hospital referral

Urgent hospital admission

level of evidence for crb 65
Level of evidence for CRB-65

Step 1: Derivation

identification of factors with predictive power

Step 2: Validation

evidence of reproducible accuracy

Narrow Broad

Step 3: Impact Analysis

evidence of rule changing behaviour and improving outcome

Level of Evidence

4

3

2

1

statistical methods
Statistical Methods
  • Derivation study used as predictive model
  • Results presented as ratio measurement:

predicted deaths by CRB-65 rule

observed deaths in validation study

crb 65
CRB-65

Confusion

Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min

Blood pressure (SBP≤ 90 or DBP≤60)

Age ≥ 65

0

1 or 2

3 or 4

Low Risk

mortality 1.2%

Intermediate Risk

mortality 8.13%

High Risk

mortality 31%

slide12

n = 799

events = 0 (0%)

RR 9.63 (CI 1.23 – 75.63)

n = 1887

events = 14 (0.74%)

RR 1.25 (CI 0.60 – 2.59)

crb 651
CRB-65

Confusion

Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min

Blood pressure (SBP≤ 90 or DBP≤60)

Age ≥ 65

0

1 or 2

3 or 4

Low Risk

mortality 1.2%

Intermediate Risk

mortality 8.13%

High Risk

mortality 31%

slide14

n = 647

events = 10 (1.5%)

RR 4.92 (CI 2.39 – 10.11)

n = 5674

events = 455 (8.0%)

RR 0.99 (CI 0.80 – 1.23)

crb 652
CRB-65

Confusion

Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min

Blood pressure (SBP≤ 90 or DBP≤60)

Age ≥ 65

0

1 or 2

3 or 4

Low Risk

mortality 1.2%

Intermediate Risk

mortality 8.13%

High Risk

mortality 31%

slide16

n = 26

events = 5 (19.2%)

RR 1.58 (CI 0.59 – 4.19)

n = 869

events = 257 (29.6%)

RR 1.04 (CI 0.88 – 1.23)

hospital based patients
Hospital Based Patients

Confusion

Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min

Blood pressure (SBP≤ 90 or DBP≤60)

Age ≥ 65

0

1 or 2

3 or 4

Low Risk

mortality 1.2%

Intermediate Risk

mortality 8.13%

High Risk

mortality 31%

community based patients
Community Based Patients
  • General trend towards over-prediction
  • However,
    • Low cohort numbers
    • Low event numbers
future work
Future Work

Step 1: Derivation

identification of factors with predictive power

Step 2: Validation

evidence of reproducible accuracy

Narrow Broad

Step 3: Impact Analysis

evidence of rule changing behaviour and improving outcome

Level of Evidence

4

3

2

1

acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
  • RCSI Research Institute
  • Grainne McCabe, RCSI Library
ad