1 / 16

Light h 0 decay in SUSY cascade Jet Reconstruction & B tagging

Light h 0 decay in SUSY cascade Jet Reconstruction & B tagging. Introduction First use of DST Jet reconstruction and calibration issues B tagging Conclusion . Filip Moortgat (CERN) Alain Romeyer (Mons - Belgium). Introduction. Benchmark point LM5 Tan b = 10 A O = 0 µ > 0

rendor
Download Presentation

Light h 0 decay in SUSY cascade Jet Reconstruction & B tagging

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Light h0 decay in SUSY cascade Jet Reconstruction & B tagging • Introduction • First use of DST • Jet reconstruction and calibration issues • B tagging • Conclusion Filip Moortgat (CERN) Alain Romeyer (Mons - Belgium) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  2. Introduction Benchmark point LM5 Tan b = 10 AO = 0 µ > 0 M1/2 = 360 GeV M0 = 230 GeV MSUGRA 5 parameters : m0, m1/2,A, tan b, sign(µ) S. Abdullin – L. Pape Update II of the new MSUGRA test points proposal Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  3. Signatures q ~35 % or 85 % b 72 % q b LSP MET p B tagging p Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  4. Signatures… • Main background expected to come from SUSY itself!!! (sbottom…) • 100 000 evt production of all SUSY channels (20% of them contain our signal) • SM background expected small (Z+jets, top…) • rejected by high jet multiplicity and important MET • was not our priority (analysis has just started  CRAB & LCG) • Reconstruction strategy • focus on jet reconstruction, b tagging and MET • Access info from DST using ORCA_8_7_2 • test of official Jet Calibration (GammaJet) • Try different Track Counting significance threshold Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  5. DST Jet calibration Only b jets coming from h0 decay(mh = 116 GeV) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  6. Jet E resolution Only b jets coming from h0 decay(mh = 116 GeV) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  7. Minv (Signal + SUSY bkg) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  8. Comparison with private calib. Only b jets coming from h0 decay(mh = 116 GeV) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  9. Jet E resolution Only b jets coming from h0 decay(mh = 116 GeV) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  10. IC with 0.7 cone size Only b jets coming from h0 decay(mh = 116 GeV) No calibration for 0.7 cone  0.5 cone calibration used !!! Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  11. Btagging Track Counting Algo. (only b tagged jets) Tag jet if 2 tracks are found above a given Significance threshold Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  12. B tagging eff/mistag IC cone = 0.5 Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  13. Impact on Minv (Signal) Only b jets coming from h0 decay(mh = 116 GeV) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  14. Minv (Signal + SUSY bkg) Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  15. Conclusion • Jet calibration on DST for 0.5 cone and IC algo is working • Jet reconstruction performance with other cone size cannot be done with DST info (no calibration) • Hardest cut for B tagging Track Counting does not improve the S/B ratio • Solution : try to reconstruct the jet charge • SM bkg analysis started (on LCG using CRAB) in particular for tt inclusive Alain Romeyer - March 2005

  16. Conclusion… Alain Romeyer - March 2005

More Related