1 / 23

Correctional Case Law

Correctional Case Law. Criminal Responsibility. Liable Persons All persons are liable who commit in the state any crime including, 1. Committing a crime in ______________ 2. Commits a crime of state if committed would be larceny and is found __________________________

remile
Download Presentation

Correctional Case Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Correctional Case Law

  2. Criminal Responsibility • Liable Persons • All persons are liable who commit in the state any crime including, • 1. Committing a crime in ______________ • 2. Commits a crime of state if committed would be larceny and is found __________________________ • 3. Person being out of state, counsels, procures, aids or abets _________________________ • 4. Person being out of state ___________________________________ • 5. Person who commits an act which affects persons or property within the state whole or part with any stolen property another to commit a crime abducts or kidnaps any person

  3. Persons not liable to punishment may be: • Children under the age of _________ • Children between _______ without clear proof they knew the wrongfulness • Made under _____________________ • Person committed the act without being __________________ • An act under threats sufficient to show that the person had reasonable cause to believe ________________________ 8 years 8 & 14 ignorance or mistake of fact conscious thereof their lives would be endanger

  4. Principals • Every person concerned in the commission of a crime • Aids or abets in its commission (whether present or absent) • Every person who, directly or indirectly, counsels, encourages, hires, commands, induces or otherwise procures another to commit a crime

  5. Accessories • After the commission of a crime, conceals or aids such offender with intent that he may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction or punishment, having the knowledge that such offender has committed a felony • Any person who learns, after the fact that a particular individual has committed a crime and thereafter receives, comforts or assists

  6. Liability • Vicarious Liability • Something done or suffered by one on behalf of another • 3rd Party Liability • When one agency provides training for another agency, the agency providing the training is liable

  7. Negligence • Four elements of negligence • 1. A duty or obligation recognized by the law requiring the person to conform to a certain level of conduct for the protection of others against unreasonable risk. • 2. A failure on the persons part to conform to the standards required • 3. A reasonable close, causal connection between the conduct and the resulting injury • 4. Actual loss or damage resulting to the interest of another

  8. Seven Areas of Negligence • Supervision • Direction • Training • Retention • Hiring • Assignment • Entrustment

  9. Constitutional Elements • Bill of Rights • The first ten amendments to the Constitution • First Amendment: freedom of speech, religion and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances • Fourth Amendment: rights against unreasonable searches and seizures • Fifth Amendment: primarily thought of as the right to silence

  10. Search Warrant • Having determined and listed probable cause and those particulars regarding the place to be searched and the things to be seized, the info is presented to a magistrateto obtain a warrant.

  11. Warrant must state: • Specific persons and items to be seized • Including • full descriptions, colors, characteristics, serial numbers, model numbers, etc. • The specific ________ to be searched place (s)

  12. Scope of search recording • Systematically, _________chronological order of search and seizure of any items • Search is _______ to size or characteristic of the object being sought • Once the __________ has been seized, the search is _____ • Exception would be searching for drugs • __________ found during the course of a lawful search may be seized limited specific item over Anything

  13. Lawful Arrest • If probable cause exists to make a lawful arrest, a search incidental to that arrest may be conducted to remove: • Evidence • Fruits or instruments of crime • Contraband • Weapons • Means of escape or suicide

  14. Probable Cause • Probable cause must exist______to making an arrest • If the arrest is made to obtain the probable cause needed forthe arrest, the arrest is_illegal___and any evidence obtainedmay beinadmissible • Extent of incidental search is limited to: • Entire person • Anything in the person’s immediate___________ • Anything in_______________________at the time of apprehension prior possession immediate control or reach

  15. Rules and Doctrines • Exclusionary Rule • Any evidence obtained through illegal means may be inadmissible • Fruit of the poisonous tree • Any evidence obtained as a result of an initial illegal act/search may be inadmissible • Plain View • Any evidence that is in plain view of an officer from where he/she legally stands is probable cause • Good Faith

  16. Fifth Amendment • The right against self-incrimination • Shall not be deprived of: • life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

  17. Miranda vs Arizona 1966 • Resulted in the precedence to advise accused persons of the rights against self-incrimination and to counsel • Any information obtained through questioning a subject without advisement of the right to remain silent may be inadmissible • Coercion, trickery, or other unorthodox means of extracting information from a suspect may be a violation of Fifth Amendment rights

  18. Billings vs Vernal, Utah 1983 • Negligent Direction • Negligent Training Police department hired an officer and put him on the street. The officer was on the street for a year and never had any formal training. The officer was accused of police brutality and he said he had never been trained; therefore, he could not be held responsible. The courts agreed. The Chief of Police was ordered to pay $50,000 in punitive damages

  19. Whitley vs Warden, 1971 • Negligent Direction • Negligent Training • Officer Warden presented information for a search warrant and was given the warrant. When it went to court, the information used in the warrant was not documented and, therefore, the warrant was inadmissible. • If it is not documented it did not happen

  20. Warning includes: • Right to remain silent • Any statement can and will be used against subject in a court of law • Right to consult with an attorney prior to questioning • May terminate questioning at any time for any reason

  21. Exceptions to Fifth Amendment • Spontaneous utterance • Unsolicited impulsive statement or excuse of action made by a suspect upon apprehension, during transportation, etc. • Admissible as evidence • No longer spontaneous if the suspect is asked questions or to repeat a previous statement

  22. Exceptions continued • Public safety • During apprehension, it was noticed that the suspect was wearing an empty holster and was asked where the gun was. • When expected response would be non-incriminatory • Non-custodial

  23. Review • Liable Persons • Principals • Accessories • Bill of Rights • 1st Amendment • Probable Cause • Searches • Fifth Amendment

More Related